Could everyone please stop jumping on this bandwagon? There's no official confirmation from the customer.And the Indian Navy has chosen the Rafale -M
Could everyone please stop jumping on this bandwagon? There's no official confirmation from the customer.And the Indian Navy has chosen the Rafale -M
You take pride in doing something that others would say is a handicap - re-inventing the wheel. You're certainly welcome to take pride in the fact that China was forced into a more difficult path of military modernization than most other nations, but that doesn't make it an objectively good thing. I think it's certainly better for a nation to simply buy technology than to be forced to spend the money to rediscover what someone already discovered in another country.
Didn't J-10 nearly get cancelled due to PLAAF's preference for Su-27 around 1999? Fortunately the project had support from the very top, from Jiang Zemin himself who directed more funding into the project and famously smashed a tea cup in front of PLAAF people who was recommending that J-10 be cancelled to free up funds for more flankers.Some folks may take pride in China's path, I simply observe that it has worked, whereas India's path has not worked. With LCA India is attempting to develop an aircraft that is technologically on par with the J-10. Which begs the question: where was India's JH-7? Where was its J-8? India had its Q-5 in the Marut but then threw all of that expertise away. That was not a failure of technology, it was a failure of political-strategic-institutional vision and management, and that is the common thread running through all examples of India's chronic lack of achievement.
By all rights India should be able to make careful and judicious use of its greater access to global defence markets to accelerate the development of its own indigenous industries, just as China did. However, for any number of non-technical reasons this has not happened. Rather, ready access to imports have become a noose around India's neck, consigning it to import dependency for the foreseeable future. If India were somehow cut off from all western and Russian technology imports for even a decade, I suspect it would come out of the experience in a better position, or at least with a more sound basis for future developments, than where it is now.
Erm...you are the one speculating that Americans will simply hand over engine technology to Indians. There's not a shred of evidence that will happen.This is just 100% speculation, and no facts. You've assumed that India will not be able to import the technology for an engine and then talked about the implications of your assumption. That might have a value to some, but I don't think it's valuable.
Also, as I mentioned to another poster, it's foolish to assume nationality because someone doesn't conform with random nationalism.
Import needlewhere was India's JH-7? Where was its J-8?
I believe what he meant is "Are there India's JH-7 and India's J-8 that actually exist in physical and operational forms?"Import needle
Didn't J-10 nearly get cancelled due to PLAAF's preference for Su-27 around 1999? Fortunately the project had support from the very top, from Jiang Zemin himself who directed more funding into the project and famously smashed a tea cup in front of PLAAF people who was recommending that J-10 be cancelled to free up funds for more flankers.
Ironically this situation might be a mirror of the case between LCA and Su-30MKI, just with the opposite resolution.