Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Rettam Stacf

Junior Member
Registered Member
You forget the mighty LCA TEJA.

It looks like the Indian Navy has abandoned the idea of Tejas for the aircraft carrier Vikrant. Instead, a new twin engineer fighter will be developed to be inducted in 2031 for the navy.

Tejas done, focus on three other fighter jets: two for IAF, one Navy​

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The third new fighter jet, which is most challenging, is the Twin-Engine Deck-Based Fighter (TEDBF) for the Navy, which will be flying by 2026. “The TEDBF is a much bigger challenge,” Deodhare said, adding that it took time “maturing those technologies”.

Aircraft carriers, he said, are a “very high-value asset” and extra caution is required to prevent any damage to it. After successful on-shore tests in November 2019, they got permission for ship trials in 2020. “When we went to the ship, in five days we did 18 landings, and not a single miss… Now the Navy is clear that we can make the aircraft, because the Air Force technologies were all there, this was the key.” The Navy’s requirements were finalised in May 2020 after which “we started the concept design”.

He said the Navy is looking for its induction in 2031.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Why Indian designers didn't make the elevator larger when the Vikrant still in paper to adapt larger plane like Rafale or F/A-18? This work should be prepared in advance. Or they have decided to buy MIG-29K.

Just for general FYI, the elevators are something like 9 and 8.6m wide (2 different sizes).

The folded F-18E/F is about 9.7m wide.

I’m going to throw some theories out there for the sake of discussion.

1. The original intention was always to field the MiG-29K, but some politician thought it would be more prestigious to sport Western planes.

2. Similar to the bow issue, the size is constrained by the drydock.

I don’t know any concrete details, so I would love to learn more.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Just for general FYI, the elevators are something like 9 and 8.6m wide (2 different sizes).

The folded F-18E/F is about 9.7m wide.

I’m going to throw some theories out there for the sake of discussion.

1. The original intention was always to field the MiG-29K, but some politician thought it would be more prestigious to sport Western planes.

2. Similar to the bow issue, the size is constrained by the drydock.

I don’t know any concrete details, so I would love to learn more.

Just shave 0.35m off each wing and they'd just about make it.
 

joeljp06

New Member
Registered Member
Just for general FYI, the elevators are something like 9 and 8.6m wide (2 different sizes).

The folded F-18E/F is about 9.7m wide.

I’m going to throw some theories out there for the sake of discussion.

1. The original intention was always to field the MiG-29K, but some politician thought it would be more prestigious to sport Western planes.

2. Similar to the bow issue, the size is constrained by the drydock.

I don’t know any concrete details, so I would love to learn more.
actually the elevators are something like 11.2m wide
Fa18 could fit in with not much problems
rafale's wingtip hardpoints have to be removed in order to fit in

Fa18 is the best option for vikrant.
it have several advantages when compared to the rafale
 

joeljp06

New Member
Registered Member
so all of the nato (usa france uk & spain), russian, chinese and ex-soviet indian carriers have a bulbous bow.

Even older carriers have a bulbous bow (earlier nimitz), just a smaller one. Vikrant is definitely one of a kind
does the charles de gaulle have a bulbous bow?
i havent seen one
 
Top