Indian Economics thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
The delusion in this thread is mind boggling lol. In what way is India competitive in building any infrastructure mega project outside of its borders?
What do they bring to the table? financing? technology transfer? cheap materials? Or just cheap labor?
What is in it for the other countries?
How is those lines economically viable, and if not, is the Indian government going to foot the bill? What's stopping them from not paying like every other time?
I can see the benefits for ASEAN stretching the line from Singapore to the coastal regions of Burma, and linking up with China in Yunnan. Going to Bangladesh might be a stretch but workable if their economy continue to develop and are a viable pool of cheap labor.
The way I see it, the only viable way this route can come into being is if Singapore/Malaysia and Thailand push for additional rail capacity after the first connection to China prove to be viable. Then the next stage would be an extension into Burma and possibly completing the loop into Yunnan. Then a next stage into Bangladesh, but this would probably be like 20 years down the track and Bangladesh gets close to where Thailand is today thus presenting a massive market opportunity. After that is complete would the option of connection to India open up, and they will probably just go to Kolkata and the Indians will need to sort out their poor North East themselves.

End of the day, India today isn't fit to lace China's boots when it comes to its infrastructure construction or financing. It might talk a great talk, but its got nothing to back it up, especially when it can't even build out its own networks, let alone competing with China. (Leave it to Japan, Euros & Americans)
@Godzilla bro need some Milktea to ease your mental torture, I can conjure one IF you need too...lol look at @Coalescence , he had try it and look how relax he is...lol
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
The bilateral trade between India and ASEAN alone is more than 78 billion dollars that alone is more than enough to fund and sustain this network of railways and roadways and i am not even adding Bangladesh , Nepal and Bhutan
India has huge trade deficit with ASEAN so this network of railways and roadways will be benificial for ASEAN more than India because India is a huge market for their products
78 billion trade between ASEAN and India is a rounding error for the trade between China and ASEAN. In 2021, the China/ASEAN trade is 878 billion, exactly 800 billion higher than the India number. So why would ASEAN care about some connections to India?

Not sure if you ever been to Thailand or Malaysia, but they aren't exactly flat. Terrain is not just about mountains, but rivers, swamps, jungle all are not fun to build in. Myanmar is only flattish in the middle, but since you want to go through it to Thailand, that's two mountain ranges got to go through.

Also have you consider the temperature variations on material? Sub arctic in Nepal to tropical in Singapore? I'm pretty sure India don't have the steel mills to provide the speciality steel.

But I think I'm getting ahead of myself, let's see India build even 1 meter of HSR track first anywhere.
 

Chandragupt

Junior Member
Registered Member
@Godzilla bro need some Milktea to ease your mental torture, I can conjure one IF you need too...lol look at @Coalescence , he had try it and look how relax he is...lol
India's bilateral trade with ASEAN economies is expected to reach $300 billion by 2025, and it is the fifth largest trading partner for India following North America, EU, North-East Asia and GCC-West Asia.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Chandragupt

Junior Member
Registered Member
78 billion trade between ASEAN and India is a rounding error for the trade between China and ASEAN. In 2021, the China/ASEAN trade is 878 billion, exactly 800 billion higher than the India number. So why would ASEAN care about some connections to India?

Not sure if you ever been to Thailand or Malaysia, but they aren't exactly flat. Terrain is not just about mountains, but rivers, swamps, jungle all are not fun to build in. Myanmar is only flattish in the middle, but since you want to go through it to Thailand, that's two mountain ranges got to go through.

Also have you consider the temperature variations on material? Sub arctic in Nepal to tropical in Singapore? I'm pretty sure India don't have the steel mills to provide the speciality steel.

But I think I'm getting ahead of myself, let's see India build even 1 meter of HSR track first anywhere.
lol bilateral trade between China and Pakistan is 8 billion dollars only so why is china making cpec (which is still on paper for last 25 years )
India ASEAN trade will keep increasing and this proposed rail and road network will only increase India ASEAN trade and terrain in Myanmar not difficult compared to the one in India’s north east or Nepal it’s much easier and technology has improved too
And ASEAN needs india to counter China those small countries cannot counter huge china on their own that’s also the reason why they need this connectivity but trade is the primary objective rest everything else is secondary
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
The bilateral trade between India and ASEAN alone is more than 78 billion dollars that alone is more than enough to fund and sustain this network of railways and roadways and i am not even adding Bangladesh , Nepal and Bhutan
India has huge trade deficit with ASEAN so this network of railways and roadways will be benificial for ASEAN more than India because India is a huge market for their products

But then why would India engage in a project that hurts India??

India has a trade deficit with ASEAN and yet wants to finance freight rail throughout ASEAN so that the trade deficit can be widened further? That's India doing double damage to itself. If India can export to ASEAN then maybe that project could potentially be slightly worthwhile.

Anyway this is all a massive heap of meh.
 

Chandragupt

Junior Member
Registered Member
But then why would India engage in a project that hurts India??

India has a trade deficit with ASEAN and yet wants to finance freight rail throughout ASEAN so that the trade deficit can be widened further? That's India doing double damage to itself. If India can export to ASEAN then maybe that project could potentially be slightly worthwhile.

Anyway this is all a massive heap of meh.
It won’t always remain this way India and ASEAN can tallk to balance the trade but its a fact that as long as indian industries don’t have the capability to compete globally this trade deficit will persist india should also see that a common indian is getting quality products at cheaper rates
Trade deficit exists because ASEAN makes better products at cheaper rates there is no other reason
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
78 billion trade between ASEAN and India is a rounding error for the trade between China and ASEAN. In 2021, the China/ASEAN trade is 878 billion, exactly 800 billion higher than the India number. So why would ASEAN care about some connections to India?

Not sure if you ever been to Thailand or Malaysia, but they aren't exactly flat. Terrain is not just about mountains, but rivers, swamps, jungle all are not fun to build in. Myanmar is only flattish in the middle, but since you want to go through it to Thailand, that's two mountain ranges got to go through.

Also have you consider the temperature variations on material? Sub arctic in Nepal to tropical in Singapore? I'm pretty sure India don't have the steel mills to provide the speciality steel.

But I think I'm getting ahead of myself, let's see India build even 1 meter of HSR track first anywhere.

... not to mention, swamp, clayey soil everywhere, monsoon seasons disrupting projects and screwing around with water saturation. Anyway all can easily be overcome but requires more money and time.

The thing is the 78 billion trade between India and ASEAN is India importing more from ASEAN while the 878 billion in trade between ASEAN and China is ASEAN importing from China. I can see more trade routes being profitable and worthwhile for China but India doing this just so they can buy more from ASEAN? I dunno why that's supposed to be good. Maybe they foresee massive Indian exports to ASEAN. Cart before the horse has left the room, this is just a broken cart and a picture of a functional vehicle.

Also we're not talking about HSR. India will maybe import Japanese HSR. If they start developing their own, it'll be 20 years of academic studies (like China did starting in 1980s) and then around a decade learning from established makers if possible and if their politicians and industrialists can manage that. Then about 10 years of reverse engineering one generation. My dad talked about Chinese research universities researching HSR and maglev back in the 1980s. Only in the 2000s did a chance opportunist politician manage to break some red tape to get the project rolling. 20 years of tendering and learning foreign technologies, 10 years of integrating with domestic research and upping every thousand piece of componentry and subcomponent and then manufacturing. I would bet a million bucks India will not be able to complete the domestic HSR program within 30 years. They can buy and rebrand and of course they'd call Chinese ones copied when even doing that would be a monumental challenge for Indian academics and industry - note that the Chinese first gens were "rebranded" in the sense that Chinese engineers had to redevelop and understand and master every single of the multi thousands of technologies involved with just the first gen HSR. Now China's on its third gen with second gen already integrating technologies Japan, Canada, and France did not use.

China in HSR is actually a step above Japan in some measures. While Japan never really stopped improving its HSR tech, China's next ones will leave Japan's in the dust if nothing more than pace. India has yet to gain understanding of even first gen HSR level. All talk, buzzwords, and slandering others (China). No substance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top