France Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
According to non official reports, the towing bar broke while the tractor was pushing the jet (a Navy Rafale M)
Did that happen in Poland?

If it did, there will be a whole now batch of jokes about it...though it is not a joking matter.

Certainly not a lesson in how to win friends and influence people.
 

navyreco

Senior Member
^ Indeed

French Navy Commando
wNzakRS.jpg
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Ouch! It's the feeling you get when someone with a shopping trolley scrapes your million dollar super car - in this case 100 million. :D

Simple things like this need to be corrected with more joint excecises I wonder who was responsible and if French ground crews were involved or polish
 

navyreco

Senior Member
[video=youtube;cpQkaGJymYY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpQkaGJymYY[/video]

[video=youtube;3Mb9RXlwKjg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Mb9RXlwKjg[/video]
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
French Army and Navy use NH-90.

Right now Army had ordered 68 NH-90 TTH, 8 delivered and 4 new for this year.
Use by 1 Combat Hel Rgt at Phalsbourg, 3 helos, "GAMSTAT" ( OEU ) at Valence 1 helo and 4 at Le Luc, school for Army Aviation, OCU, also for Navy crew.

And Navy 27 NH-90 NFH ordered ( but only 14 ASW kits ), 11 delivered and 2/3 new for this year.
Use by 33F ( Flotilla ) at Lann Bihoué 5 helos, 31 F at Hyères 5 helos and 10S Hyères ( OEU ) 1 helo.

Tigre : 80 ordered, 40 HAP, 40 HAC ( with Helfire ), 43 in service : 39 and 4. 4 new for this year.
 
Last edited:

navyreco

Senior Member
First Rafale M "Tranche 4/F3" with AESA radar and other upgrades delivered to French Navy
The French Navy "Flotille 11F" Naval Aviation Strike Fighter Squadron, based in Landivisiau, Brittany, has taken delivery of its first "Tranche 4" Rafale M (Rafale M40). According to the French Navy, it is the first M variant (for Marine, Navy in French) aircraft to be equipped with systems and equipment that substantially improve its combat capabilities as well as its air defense missions for the protection of national airspace.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Pointblank

Senior Member
US lawmakers are urging NATO pickup the two Mistral class amphibs that were due to be sold to Russia as a common asset, like the E-3's or the C-17's:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Text of letter to NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen from US lawmakers.

Dear Mr. Secretary General:

We are writing to express our deep concerns regarding France's contract to supply two Mistral warships to the Russian Federation this fall and to propose a solution to this vexing problem. In light of Russia's recent aggression against Ukraine, we believe that the sale would send the wrong signal to President Putin – that it is "business as usual" – and would enhance Russia's military capabilities, even as President Putin has threatened further military actions against Russia's neighbors.

President Putin's invasion and seizure of Ukrainian territory was a blatant violation of international law and of Russia's commitments to Ukraine. While there was a time following the end of the Cold War when we thought Russia was acting more cooperatively and could be a partner in European stability, that period has unfortunately come to an end. It is critical that NATO countries no longer provide powerful weapons to enhance Russia's a ability to intimidate or even invade its neighbors.

In this regard, we believe that France and other NATO allies should avoid selling or transferring to Russia military items which would significantly increase its capabilities. We, therefore, urge France to cancel the sale of the two advanced Mistral-class amphibious assault and helicopter carrier ships. These ships would enhance the very expeditionary capabilities Russia used to capture Crimea, including rapid deployment of troops, armor, and helicopter gunships against poorly defended areas in Ukraine and other states in the region. Each ship has the capacity to carry 700 troops, 60 armed vehicles, four landing craft, and 16 helicopters – a formidable component of a military campaign.

We appreciate the reported willingness of the government of France to make a final decision on the sale of the ships this fall. We also understand the financial ramifications for France of cancelling its contract. The ships reportedly cost $1.6 billion and their construction employs hundreds of workers.

Therefore, we suggest that NATO collectively purchase or lease the warships as a common naval asset. As mentioned earlier, the purchase would send a strong signal to President Putin that the NATO allies will not tolerate or in any way enable his reckless moves. In addition, such a purchase would rapidly enhance NATO capabilities at a moment when many Allies have been cutting defense expenditures and greatly reassure Alliance members and partners in Central and Eastern Europe who feel most vulnerable by this force multiplier in the hands of the Russian military. Finally, we would point out that there is ample precedent for NATO to purchase shared assets, including the Alliance's fleet of E-3A AWACS aircraft.

Mr. Secretary General, we believe that NATO's joint acquisition of the Mistrals truly would be a win-win-win move – for France, for NATO, and for Ukraine and other states in the region under Russian pressure. We ask that you give serious consideration to our proposal and look forward to your response.

The idea is a good one on paper because it fills a critical gap needed by NATO. However, French political concerns and of course, the budgetary situation in Europe that is precluding additional defence spending would be major roadblocks to this deal, unless the US fronts the money to buy the ships off from France, and pays for the upkeep.
 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Excellent idea!! Been saying this since the start that someone just buy them from France even better give them to NATO almost like giving them to Ukraine if they join NATO!!

2014 and country's are being invaded like it was the 18th century that's just not on
 

Franklin

Captain
US lawmakers are urging NATO pickup the two Mistral class amphibs that were due to be sold to Russia as a common asset, like the E-3's or the C-17's:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




The idea is a good one on paper because it fills a critical gap needed by NATO. However, French political concerns and of course, the budgetary situation in Europe that is precluding additional defence spending would be major roadblocks to this deal, unless the US fronts the money to buy the ships off from France, and pays for the upkeep.

There is one problem with this idea. The Americans don't need or want these ships. And the European nations are facing economic and financial distress and are facing cuts in their military budgets. They don't have the money to buy or operate these ships. Who is going to buy these white elephants ?
 
Top