Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
Rather than warning, it's that more and more equipment is sent to Fujian and I don't see the stuff going home until the civil war is over. On day 1 of the crisis, people even spotted APCs with active defense systems which haven't ever been seen during open events. These are almost certainly 100% war ready units.

Also the emphasis on China's low spending could very well be shown to a misdirection much like how Russians had way more missiles than the West believed they had stockpiled.

If China is gonna bide their time, the govt would have gone out to announce higher budget and military buildup in response to US aggression. However if they're gonna hit sooner rather than later, then a secret mobilization and rearmament makes more sense. There may have been several years where China already had real spending on par with NATO level.

Winter attack makes more sense because the heightened difficulty will disfavor US who suffers more from tyranny of distance.

US invasion seems more and more inevitable, but as with almost every major cold war battlefield between China and America, China came out ahead due to better and longer term planning, it wouldn't be out of line to assume this battlefield will be the same.

China is no Ukraine nor Poland, they'll not sit around as US plans to take territory and start a world war. Beijing will move first and by the time US is ready to flood Taiwan with little green men and declare Taiwan "independence", the guns and missiles of the PLA will already be waiting on the Eastern shoreline.
If the US and the DPP back down, that's a win for China. If they don't and start a war, that's also a win for China. War isn't certain. There's still time for the DPP to compromise. You have to at least give them the opportunity to consider one country two systems before you destroy them and implement one country one system
 

efficient_kiwi

New Member
Registered Member
What bothers me about a lot of Taiwanese perspectives on this issue is that people are so fixated on moral theater and it doesn’t help at all resolve the problem. Even if you’re pro independence realistically Taiwan will never be able to achieve independence peacefully without persuading people in China to find that outcome acceptable, and being condescending just encourages people in China to adopt harsher attitudes towards Taiwanese perspectives. Is that fair? No. But the harsh reality of politics is that the most realistic solutions are rarely ever fair. You have to genuinely care about the other side’s views if you want to find common ground, and in my experience a lot of Taiwanese like to feign that they care as a matter of looking morally superior without really acknowledging when people from the Chinese side don’t feel listened to. This is understandable, as obviously everyone wants to settle things on their own terms, and China’s natural position of power in this situation means the Chinese side can afford to be less sensitive to Taiwanese views, but in this kind of situation you can either care about moral theater or you can care about practical outcomes. The former actively works against the latter, and the former has a predictable ending that is going to be far worse for Taiwan than it will be for China. Because at some point the pain of being isolated by the western world for using force against Taiwan is going to be negligible and tolerable for China, and simply hoping and wishing for a China that will forever remain weak or incapable is just a bad bet. If China really wants reunification as an outcome and the West actively tries to suppress and undermine China then a weaker China will have nothing to lose trying again and again to “correct” the Taiwan situation, and will be even more motivated by resentments to boot, and if China does manage to become powerful enough to ignore punishment by the western world then they’re going to move ahead without concerning themselves with what anyone wants. The nature of the balance of power here puts the onus on Taiwan to find a way to get China to change its mind, and while that’s not fair stirring hostilities with China while insisting China’s the one that’s being unreasonable so there’s nothing to consider from China’s perspective accomplishes pretty much nothing if you want to avoid a contest of powers as the way to decide Taiwan’s fate. Sorry for making you the target of this commentary, but some of your posts here really evoke this sort of dynamic that I think is quite counterproductive.

Thank you for this comment, and please know that I will be completely sincere in this response. Perhaps there was a bit of sarcasm in other ones, lol, but I am going to be completely sincere in this one.

I totally agree with you re: a counterproductive dynamic. I just think we’re operating from very different pretexts, since you seem to think peaceful unification is possible (which is not the case for me, for reasons below). I actually think I understand why the Chinese think Taiwan should be part of China. Historically(well, up until 1895 happened) and culturally(well, up until we were cut off for 4 decades or so), it makes far more sense for Taiwan to be part of China than independent. I think the closest analogy would be Hokkaido and Japan: fairly recently colonized (by the Japanese from Honshu, in this case, about two centuries after Koxinga removed the Dutch), some geographical barriers (though of course, the Tsugaru Strait is far narrower than the Taiwan Strait), a fairly significant indigenous population that was brutally dispersed, etc. The difference however, is that the 清 dynasty was incompetent, arrogant, debaucherous, and senile, and couldn’t even hold on to one of their most lucrative and quickly-modernizing provinces, unlike the Japanese who reformed and beat the Russians decisively. As the Athenians once said, “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” C’est la vie.

Ok, that was a pretty significant detour and this isn’t supposed to be a history lesson. The issue, I think, that is causing all the moral theater is that most Taiwanese no longer think it possible to convince the Chinese of Taiwan’s independence. Peaceful independence has always been a pipe dream, and other options such as 一國兩制 are no longer acceptable after seeing what happened to Hong Kong. I recall 真普選, 雨傘革, and 反送中 very vividly. I’m going to be frank with you: I no longer think peaceful unification is possible. The recent comments from your ambassador to France, Lu Shaye, has only solidified this view. I’m sure you’ve heard, but he insisted that the Taiwanese will be subjected to “re-education” after unification. Your government is going to subject us to the same treatment as Uyghurs, who were bombing train stations and randomly stabbing people in the streets, while I am pretty sure that there have been nada Taiwanese terrorism attacks. 是可忍,孰不可忍?

Considering that we are currently outnumbered, outspent, out-teched by the Chinese, plus engaging in dialogue appears to be futile (considering the gulf between our two peoples, not to mention governments), what else is there to do but condescend and engage in vague moral concepts such as democracy and human rights? It’s one of the final joys left to a people who is likely to suffer great pain and suffering sometime in the decades to come. I care about moral theater not because I don’t care about practical outcomes, but because I cannot see any practical outcome that is acceptable to me. Why should we unify if we are fine on our own? If we unify, is there a future where we choose our own leadership through free and fair elections, where we can assemble in the streets and protest the government, and where we can post funny pictures of Xi Jinping as Winnie? (Actually, I think you can do the latter now if I’m correct, but that initial censoring was so bizarre.) Would such an 一國兩制 be even remotely acceptable to the CCP? I think not, though I'm open to arguments to the contrary.

I just don’t think there is such a future short of some miracle where a) the Chinese people are collectively brainwashed into thinking Taiwan is independent, b) Taiwan breaks a blockade, throws the PLA back across the Taiwan Strait, and avoids starving to death, or c) the Chinese economy inexplicably collapses. Short of these, it’s likely that I would die in the war or be re-educated sometime in my late-twenties to early-thirties, and that is just f-ing unfortunate. So, so, so f-ing unfortunate.

So to all the Chinese people reading this, forgive the 灣灣’s condescension and snobbishness. It is about the only thing left to these Taiwanese who see clearly that we are the Melians to the Chinese’s Athenians, and yet will not, cannot, stomach the thought of simply laying down without a fight. Many of us are, I believe, stuck between a rock and a hard place. So we try to 富國強兵 as best as we can, and we laugh at the Chinese on the internet whenever we get the chance, while we try to not think too hard about the 東風 and 鷹擊 ready to blow us to bits. At the same time, I’m sorry about the mockery and condescension, but some of you must realize how ridiculous figures like 華春瑩 are, right? Recent tweet of “palates don’t cheat” being exhibit A. (I can lay out why I think it was absolutely hilarious if any of y'all are interested. )

I apologize for any emotional discourse. In the meantime, in the interest of convincing at least some Chinese that Taiwan is indeed currently de facto independent, I will take any questions you may have on this matter. I’m not sure how many of you don’t think Taiwan is de facto independent, but regardless, I’m open to questions. And I will try to avoid any condescension or moral theater whatsoever. Whether Taiwan should be independent is another matter entirely. I personally think it should be subjected to a referendum like the Quebec or Scottish ones, with the terms of a referendum laid out in an act (something like the Clarity Act in Canada) passed by the Legislative Yuan to legitimize the secession of a region from the ROC. The reality of the situation, however, is that the PRC will do what they please ‘cuz they got the big guns. There is no “justice” to be discussed ‘til we also get some big guns.

TL;DR: practical outcomes outside of war hopeless, chances of persuading Chinese people of Taiwanese independence nil, open to discourse but to me it is probably useless anyhow, still, open to questions.
 

W20

Junior Member
Registered Member
Very very interesting, thank you all very much.

Question: would there be any form of solution based on an "autonomous province" within the People's Republic?
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
Thank you for this comment, and please know that I will be completely sincere in this response. Perhaps there was a bit of sarcasm in other ones, lol, but I am going to be completely sincere in this one.

I totally agree with you re: a counterproductive dynamic. I just think we’re operating from very different pretexts, since you seem to think peaceful unification is possible (which is not the case for me, for reasons below). I actually think I understand why the Chinese think Taiwan should be part of China. Historically(well, up until 1895 happened) and culturally(well, up until we were cut off for 4 decades or so), it makes far more sense for Taiwan to be part of China than independent. I think the closest analogy would be Hokkaido and Japan: fairly recently colonized (by the Japanese from Honshu, in this case, about two centuries after Koxinga removed the Dutch), some geographical barriers (though of course, the Tsugaru Strait is far narrower than the Taiwan Strait), a fairly significant indigenous population that was brutally dispersed, etc. The difference however, is that the 清 dynasty was incompetent, arrogant, debaucherous, and senile, and couldn’t even hold on to one of their most lucrative and quickly-modernizing provinces, unlike the Japanese who reformed and beat the Russians decisively. As the Athenians once said, “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” C’est la vie.

Ok, that was a pretty significant detour and this isn’t supposed to be a history lesson. The issue, I think, that is causing all the moral theater is that most Taiwanese no longer think it possible to convince the Chinese of Taiwan’s independence. Peaceful independence has always been a pipe dream, and other options such as 一國兩制 are no longer acceptable after seeing what happened to Hong Kong. I recall 真普選, 雨傘革, and 反送中 very vividly. I’m going to be frank with you: I no longer think peaceful unification is possible. The recent comments from your ambassador to France, Lu Shaye, has only solidified this view. I’m sure you’ve heard, but he insisted that the Taiwanese will be subjected to “re-education” after unification. Your government is going to subject us to the same treatment as Uyghurs, who were bombing train stations and randomly stabbing people in the streets, while I am pretty sure that there have been nada Taiwanese terrorism attacks. 是可忍,孰不可忍?

Considering that we are currently outnumbered, outspent, out-teched by the Chinese, plus engaging in dialogue appears to be futile (considering the gulf between our two peoples, not to mention governments), what else is there to do but condescend and engage in vague moral concepts such as democracy and human rights? It’s one of the final joys left to a people who is likely to suffer great pain and suffering sometime in the decades to come. I care about moral theater not because I don’t care about practical outcomes, but because I cannot see any practical outcome that is acceptable to me. Why should we unify if we are fine on our own? If we unify, is there a future where we choose our own leadership through free and fair elections, where we can assemble in the streets and protest the government, and where we can post funny pictures of Xi Jinping as Winnie? (Actually, I think you can do the latter now if I’m correct, but that initial censoring was so bizarre.) Would such an 一國兩制 be even remotely acceptable to the CCP? I think not, though I'm open to arguments to the contrary.

I just don’t think there is such a future short of some miracle where a) the Chinese people are collectively brainwashed into thinking Taiwan is independent, b) Taiwan breaks a blockade, throws the PLA back across the Taiwan Strait, and avoids starving to death, or c) the Chinese economy inexplicably collapses. Short of these, it’s likely that I would die in the war or be re-educated sometime in my late-twenties to early-thirties, and that is just f-ing unfortunate. So, so, so f-ing unfortunate.

So to all the Chinese people reading this, forgive the 灣灣’s condescension and snobbishness. It is about the only thing left to these Taiwanese who see clearly that we are the Melians to the Chinese’s Athenians, and yet will not, cannot, stomach the thought of simply laying down without a fight. Many of us are, I believe, stuck between a rock and a hard place. So we try to 富國強兵 as best as we can, and we laugh at the Chinese on the internet whenever we get the chance, while we try to not think too hard about the 東風 and 鷹擊 ready to blow us to bits. At the same time, I’m sorry about the mockery and condescension, but some of you must realize how ridiculous figures like 華春瑩 are, right? Recent tweet of “palates don’t cheat” being exhibit A. (I can lay out why I think it was absolutely hilarious if any of y'all are interested. )

I apologize for any emotional discourse. In the meantime, in the interest of convincing at least some Chinese that Taiwan is indeed currently de facto independent, I will take any questions you may have on this matter. I’m not sure how many of you don’t think Taiwan is de facto independent, but regardless, I’m open to questions. And I will try to avoid any condescension or moral theater whatsoever. Whether Taiwan should be independent is another matter entirely. I personally think it should be subjected to a referendum like the Quebec or Scottish ones, with the terms of a referendum laid out in an act (something like the Clarity Act in Canada) passed by the Legislative Yuan to legitimize the secession of a region from the ROC. The reality of the situation, however, is that the PRC will do what they please ‘cuz they got the big guns. There is no “justice” to be discussed ‘til we also get some big guns.

TL;DR: practical outcomes outside of war hopeless, chances of persuading Chinese people of Taiwanese independence nil, open to discourse but to me it is probably useless anyhow, still, open to questions.
What can’t be solved peacefully in one generation might have a chance in future generations (for either outcome). The nihilism is a reflection of impatience, and it comes from a selfish attitude of wanting one’s own terms to the point of preferring violence more than wanting peace. I’ve spent *many* years on this issue in a lot of different dimensions, and I think what I’ve concluded is that so long as each side obsesses over a framing of reunification vs independence rather than peace vs war there will be conflict. Violence imo is always the worst outcome though, and so long as that remains true it never hurts to continue trying for peace.

Tbh I am extremely disturbed by how many in Taiwan would prefer going down a path that actively encourages a violent outcome for themselves so long as they get to paint themselves as the victims and as the morally righteous. Of course the Mainland side is not blameless since it’s the Mainland that maintains a threat of force as an option, but the history of this issue shows that there was a peaceful compromise the Mainland was willing to tolerate that many in Taiwan now want to throw away for little more reason than to collect vanity points and to express their contempts. That’s a kind of sentiment and viewpoint that I find to be childish, and just extremely unnecessary and regrettable.

As one Taiwanese friend of mine pointed out, this current situation basically started with Tsai’s refusal to acknowledge the 92 Consensus and the DPP’s broader attempt to make some pretty disingenuous revisions to history and cultural nomenclature to construct a “Taiwan” identity that is presented as having no association with China, so that they can wield it as a loophole to get out from under the “One China” language. I understand why those in Taiwan might want to be politically independent, but I personally feel these kinds of tactics are proactively destructive to any attempt to construct a peaceful path forward for both China and Taiwan.

To be clear, none of these follow up thoughts are directed at you. Your comments (well received) just invoked a broader expression of my personal views about the state of this issue today.
 
Last edited:

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
If the US and the DPP back down, that's a win for China. If they don't and start a war, that's also a win for China. War isn't certain. There's still time for the DPP to compromise. You have to at least give them the opportunity to consider one country two systems before you destroy them and implement one country one system
The US is never going to back down, war is as certain as death and taxes. Those who thought Pelosi was going to back down at the last moment are the same folks who continue to think Biden is going to veto that bill or that America is going to let China slide past it without picking a kinetic fight one way or another....

If US "loses" Tiawan, not only is American empire finished, but America as a nation will collapse as dissolve, this indeed unironically is a core natsec issue for the US and if it were to lose TW then its existentially, literally and figurately finished.... so far be it from being a dagger America is threatening China with, its actually the other way around.... Sure Winter might be a more strategic time for China to strike, but that also affords the US side more time to prepare.... and CPC knows thats its inevitable at this point, likely they already made the assessment for a long time.
 

tygyg1111

Captain
Registered Member
Thank you for this comment, and please know that I will be completely sincere in this response. Perhaps there was a bit of sarcasm in other ones, lol, but I am going to be completely sincere in this one.

I totally agree with you re: a counterproductive dynamic. I just think we’re operating from very different pretexts, since you seem to think peaceful unification is possible (which is not the case for me, for reasons below). I actually think I understand why the Chinese think Taiwan should be part of China. Historically(well, up until 1895 happened) and culturally(well, up until we were cut off for 4 decades or so), it makes far more sense for Taiwan to be part of China than independent. I think the closest analogy would be Hokkaido and Japan: fairly recently colonized (by the Japanese from Honshu, in this case, about two centuries after Koxinga removed the Dutch), some geographical barriers (though of course, the Tsugaru Strait is far narrower than the Taiwan Strait), a fairly significant indigenous population that was brutally dispersed, etc. The difference however, is that the 清 dynasty was incompetent, arrogant, debaucherous, and senile, and couldn’t even hold on to one of their most lucrative and quickly-modernizing provinces, unlike the Japanese who reformed and beat the Russians decisively. As the Athenians once said, “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” C’est la vie.

Ok, that was a pretty significant detour and this isn’t supposed to be a history lesson. The issue, I think, that is causing all the moral theater is that most Taiwanese no longer think it possible to convince the Chinese of Taiwan’s independence. Peaceful independence has always been a pipe dream, and other options such as 一國兩制 are no longer acceptable after seeing what happened to Hong Kong. I recall 真普選, 雨傘革, and 反送中 very vividly. I’m going to be frank with you: I no longer think peaceful unification is possible. The recent comments from your ambassador to France, Lu Shaye, has only solidified this view. I’m sure you’ve heard, but he insisted that the Taiwanese will be subjected to “re-education” after unification. Your government is going to subject us to the same treatment as Uyghurs, who were bombing train stations and randomly stabbing people in the streets, while I am pretty sure that there have been nada Taiwanese terrorism attacks. 是可忍,孰不可忍?

Considering that we are currently outnumbered, outspent, out-teched by the Chinese, plus engaging in dialogue appears to be futile (considering the gulf between our two peoples, not to mention governments), what else is there to do but condescend and engage in vague moral concepts such as democracy and human rights? It’s one of the final joys left to a people who is likely to suffer great pain and suffering sometime in the decades to come. I care about moral theater not because I don’t care about practical outcomes, but because I cannot see any practical outcome that is acceptable to me. Why should we unify if we are fine on our own? If we unify, is there a future where we choose our own leadership through free and fair elections, where we can assemble in the streets and protest the government, and where we can post funny pictures of Xi Jinping as Winnie? (Actually, I think you can do the latter now if I’m correct, but that initial censoring was so bizarre.) Would such an 一國兩制 be even remotely acceptable to the CCP? I think not, though I'm open to arguments to the contrary.

I just don’t think there is such a future short of some miracle where a) the Chinese people are collectively brainwashed into thinking Taiwan is independent, b) Taiwan breaks a blockade, throws the PLA back across the Taiwan Strait, and avoids starving to death, or c) the Chinese economy inexplicably collapses. Short of these, it’s likely that I would die in the war or be re-educated sometime in my late-twenties to early-thirties, and that is just f-ing unfortunate. So, so, so f-ing unfortunate.

So to all the Chinese people reading this, forgive the 灣灣’s condescension and snobbishness. It is about the only thing left to these Taiwanese who see clearly that we are the Melians to the Chinese’s Athenians, and yet will not, cannot, stomach the thought of simply laying down without a fight. Many of us are, I believe, stuck between a rock and a hard place. So we try to 富國強兵 as best as we can, and we laugh at the Chinese on the internet whenever we get the chance, while we try to not think too hard about the 東風 and 鷹擊 ready to blow us to bits. At the same time, I’m sorry about the mockery and condescension, but some of you must realize how ridiculous figures like 華春瑩 are, right? Recent tweet of “palates don’t cheat” being exhibit A. (I can lay out why I think it was absolutely hilarious if any of y'all are interested. )

I apologize for any emotional discourse. In the meantime, in the interest of convincing at least some Chinese that Taiwan is indeed currently de facto independent, I will take any questions you may have on this matter. I’m not sure how many of you don’t think Taiwan is de facto independent, but regardless, I’m open to questions. And I will try to avoid any condescension or moral theater whatsoever. Whether Taiwan should be independent is another matter entirely. I personally think it should be subjected to a referendum like the Quebec or Scottish ones, with the terms of a referendum laid out in an act (something like the Clarity Act in Canada) passed by the Legislative Yuan to legitimize the secession of a region from the ROC. The reality of the situation, however, is that the PRC will do what they please ‘cuz they got the big guns. There is no “justice” to be discussed ‘til we also get some big guns.

TL;DR: practical outcomes outside of war hopeless, chances of persuading Chinese people of Taiwanese independence nil, open to discourse but to me it is probably useless anyhow, still, open to questions.
So the main problem to me is that after a few short decades, the children of the KMT, who resisted the Japanese and fought for China with their blood, now think that they are somehow not Chinese.

From an overseas Chinese' perspective, this is the result of gross, malicious interference in the governance of the island. Where once it was just a matter of KMT vs CPC, it's now an 'identity' issue. And this is not meant as a barb to you, I just want to express my opinion that this notion of a separate identity is as bogus as that of the HK roaches - manufactured for the sole purpose of weakening China.

You might ask - since I live overseas, what's it to me? Well, the main clincher is that I've seen first hand the status of all overseas Asians, not just Chinese, rise as a result of China's rise. This should fill most people with pride, in that we've finally stood up on our own two feet, and have the strength to carry all of Asia (plus others like LatAm, ME etc.) with us, and it's what convinced me that the future of all Asians lies in the rise, development and continued integrity of China.

So, coming back to the point of these manufactured identities, it points to one thing - that those abiding by it are doing so in active opposition to the prosperity of their fellow Asians.

Now, to ask a simple question, have you taken a step back and considered the overall outcome for all Asian people if China does not succeed? Does it not bother you that a supposedly sovereign country like South Korea has it's military subordinated to the US? Would it not bother you to live as a slave?

Please don't take any of the above as aggressively directed to yourself; that is not my intention. I just want to ask, when you have boiled everything down to the most fundamental core, can you, with good conscience still hold a view of independence as palatable?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top