Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.

montyp165

Senior Member
beijing doesnt seem too bothered with the save face thing. i think its one of those stereotypes that some "strategists" mistook for actual weakness and thought that they could somehow influence China's behavior by goading it into certain actions to "save face".

Case in point, Russia for example had far better PR than China before the Ukraine war happened, yet the West basically shut them down and sanctioned them to hell and back (let alone the omnipresent sanctions against Iran), so prioritizing something that's dependent on western media channels is just a really stupid approach. The most important thing is building one's strength to decisively change the outcomes on the ground. The media aspect of that would include underpromising and overdelivering as part of that process, both for the domestic audience and undecided third parties.
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
So what does this signify? No change? Basically no one gives a shit?
The number of planes flying around the Taiwan region right now is significantly lower than before.

Notice the emptiness of the Taiwan Strait. The only planes that are flying above the strait itself at the current moment are either domestic Taiwanese flights flying intra-island/intra-city routes, or international flights departing from/heading to Taiwan.

All international flights that would only bypass the region are avoiding the immediate areas around Taiwan by flying further east.

All domestic Chinese flights in the region are flying over-land along China's coastline, avoiding the strait.
 
Last edited:

SinoaTerrenum

New Member
Registered Member
l
Or perhaps GT and the other Chinese state commentators needed to convince everyone that China was planning to shoot down Nancy's plane to make a play similar to the rejection-then-retreat technique from psychology that's often found in sales:

View attachment 94831


On the state and diplomatic level, people are relieved the "worse case" outcome didn't occur and retreated to what is perceived as a lower cost settlement: giving China a pass to conduct military drills off the island's near coast that would have been unthinkable months ago - no diplomatic protests, no sanctions, no threats of sending USN carrier groups to defend Taiwan, etc. Had China managed to diplomatically call off Pelosi's flight, they would had a minor diplomatic win. But now, they managed to set a precedence that allows them to change the territorial status quo in a strategic way. (Page is from Cialdini btw, highly recommended reading).

For those of us in the financial markets and watching FX/Bond moves on Monday/Tuesday, we would have seen a massive spike up in US Bond rates as China's central bank frantically sold off US Treasuries(lowering price, therefore driving up yield) and a signifiant weakening of USD as they "dumped" USD after seeing what was done to Russia. But we saw no major deviations in both UST and FX rates, meaning China's central bank was not preparing for any "fireworks"


UST 3M rates - essentially flat.
View attachment 94840


USDCNY:
View attachment 94841
Cialdini?
 

Heliox

Junior Member
Registered Member
There is an easy way for China to save face then. Get one of those VTOL drones we’ve seen on Shandong and get it to land briefly on Taiwan and take off before someone could fetch it. Capture whole thing on video. Worst case scenario would be a drone getting shot down if they decide that flare won’t cut it.
I’d say it’s better to take the win with flyovers pushing the boundaries and leave it as that.
What would China be willing to escalate to if the drone landed and got captured or the act of landing pushed someone on the ROC side to shoot it down?
It’s along the lines of why intercept SPAR19 if you are not willing to escalate to forcing it aside or shooting it down?


I get it that in the face of US salami slicing the One-China policy, China is doing it’s own salami slicing of asserting that Taiwan as a province of China has no sovereign space/rights.
But the narrative and who controls it is all important … easy to spin it as USA action as peace/democracy and China’s action as warmongering. As many have mentioned, it is likely that the self-titled “Rest of the World” will soon start taking turns to poke the Dragon by sending their own diplomats to visit Taiwan. Repeat the Pelosi scenario again ad infinitum.


Where does China go from there then?
The current scenario comes at no cost whatsoever to the actual trouble makers. Very easy for any 2 bit country thereafter to do me too visits (cue Lithuania) since if China reacts similarly, it’ll be no cost to them too.
Keep allowing those diplomats to land = tacitly enforcing the opinion that Taiwan is a sovereign state.

Keep repeatedly conducting wargames and flyovers will be spun as “harassment” and give support to outright push for Taiwan to be protected and to be an independent state in the UN sometime this year or next?
Will China go into a shooting war then (in the next 1 to 2 years) if it doesn’t want to now?


Ultimately, the One-China stance from the west is really an unabashedly two-faced admission that $$$ is more important than Taiwan and “Democracy”.
Why only punish Taiwan for a belligerent action by the US?
Why not punish the US in the one thing that draws them into the One China policy to start with?


China has been remarkably calm in the face of the last few years of trade war from the US.
Isn’t it time to weaponise their trade and supply and hit the US in that arena as a warning to anyone thinking of doing a me-too? That way, any nation thinking of jumping on the poke the Dragon bandwagon will have to think twice about the cost in sanctions and trade. A short few months disruption in supply of iPhones, amongst other things, will quickly have industry lobbyist and consumers storming Capitol hill again?
Sure, it’ll lend credence to the “decouple from China” camp but I’d say that ship has already sailed. If not, it will literally fly out of the port the moment China does a hostile takeover of Taiwan. A shooting war of any kind will immediately decouple China ... so why the reticence to get the toe wet on the economic war?


The only endgame that is win-win for China is a peaceful assimilation of Taiwan … but the current scenario doesn’t promote that at all.
 

luosifen

Senior Member
Registered Member
Did this get reported yet:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

2022-08-04 08:28:23Xinhua Editor : Li Yan
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Yang Chih-yuan, a Taiwan resident suspected of engaging in separatist activities and endangering national security, was detained by the national security organ of Wenzhou, east China's Zhejiang Province on Wednesday.
Yang, born in Taichung in 1990, has long been advocating "Taiwan independence," and colluded with others to establish an illegal organization with the aim to "push for Taiwan to become a sovereign state and join the United Nations."
Having planned and carried out separatist activities for "Taiwan independence," Yang is suspected of crimes of splitting the country and inciting others to do so.
The national security organs will leverage legal weapons such as the Anti-Secession Law and the National Security Law to punish the "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces in accordance with the law for their attempts to seek "Taiwan independence," resist reunification and undermine peace, said a national security official.
 

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
Did this get reported yet:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

2022-08-04 08:28:23Xinhua Editor : Li Yan
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Yang Chih-yuan, a Taiwan resident suspected of engaging in separatist activities and endangering national security, was detained by the national security organ of Wenzhou, east China's Zhejiang Province on Wednesday.
Yang, born in Taichung in 1990, has long been advocating "Taiwan independence," and colluded with others to establish an illegal organization with the aim to "push for Taiwan to become a sovereign state and join the United Nations."
Having planned and carried out separatist activities for "Taiwan independence," Yang is suspected of crimes of splitting the country and inciting others to do so.
The national security organs will leverage legal weapons such as the Anti-Secession Law and the National Security Law to punish the "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces in accordance with the law for their attempts to seek "Taiwan independence," resist reunification and undermine peace, said a national security official.

Why would anyone from Taiwan do this on the mainland? Sounds as stupid as Indira Ghandi having Sikh bodyguards after desecrating the Golden Temple.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top