Discussing Biden's Potential China Policy

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15887
  • Start date

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Military competition isn’t static it’s an ever evolving race. It’s idiotic to conflate future possibilities with a point in the present.
I'm going to let this one slide. But if you continue to use this kind of vulgar language, I will stop interacting with you. I treat you with courtesy and respect, I expect the same in return.
 

DarkStar

Junior Member
Registered Member
Anglo america is afraid and not confident of their ability to take on China alone; even now, they are ordering their vassals to take on more of the burden of housing and feeding their own occupation forces:

imperialism is by nature, exploitative; japan and other nations being forced to pay for the upkeep of occupying anglo forces is going to have knock on effects on japan's ability to run its own government and pay for essential services.
 

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
They go hand in hand like the American dollar and aircraft carriers. The country with the strongest military has historically implemented their national monetary system as the global reserve currency.
I can't agree more. that's why I think the current % is good. But again that just an very uneducated guess.
 

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Speak for yourself. Unlike you, some of us have family there.
that's really good. if even minor infringement doesn't exist, I would be even more proud of my country, achieving such developmental feat of integrate a huge and diverse population with complete TLC.
 

Sleepyjam

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm going to let this one slide. But if you continue to use this kind of vulgar language, I will stop interacting with you. I treat you with courtesy and respect, I expect the same in return.
I only mentioned that the people who conflate the two are idiots, wether you admit to it or not it’s up to you. If you want a more politically correct term I could use “dumb” or “not particularly bright” or something that sound more mundane. Sorry didn’t want to offend your sensibilities.
 

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Anglo america is afraid and not confident of their ability to take on China alone; even now, they are ordering their vassals to take on more of the burden of housing and feeding their own occupation forces:

imperialism is by nature, exploitative; japan and other nations being forced to pay for the upkeep of occupying anglo forces is going to have knock on effects on japan's ability to run its own government and pay for essential services.
right after a difficult and money losing Olympics. Bravo!
 

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
right after a difficult and money losing Olympics. Bravo!
I am just wondering after the cartoon warrior on the defense white paper saga, the US must be thinking: "you know what, it's best that we take that money. There is a reason we are occupying Japan"
 

nemo

Junior Member
Qing had a weak military. How did that turn out?
Self inflicted. Qing was an foreign minority regime and tried to maintain the privilege of the minority in expense of the whole nation. Qing stopped the development of the firearms because it perceived its cold arms superiority over Han. And military became an inbred caste. Once the peace rot set in, it was all over.
 

victoon

Junior Member
Registered Member
You sound like Mr T with your goal moving mental gymnastics.
You have really impressed me with your lightening fast and completely accurate judgment of other people's character from barely a few paragraphs of writing. Looking through your past posts, I see you speak with complete confidence and utmost authority on an incredibly wide variety of subjects. Only the most well read and one with huge real life experience can achieve this level of breath and depth. We are so lucky to have your as a Brigadier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W20
Top