They stated it is based not on spread inside China but on spread outside of China. US hasnt even gotten a new case per CDC. 1% globally. What spread??
It is not binary or black and white, each nations pursues an optimized maximization strategy. It simply maximizes Canada to benefit from Chinese trade while scoring points by badmouthing China at the same time.
I've made the decision to change all on-call doctors.
Change for whom?
Change for Communists of the [infection?] unit.
Are you a Communist?
Are you under the oath [to the Communist Party]?
Did you swear [promise] to serve the nation?
The time is difficult now.
Everyone can shout slogans.
Let's do it! [LOL not sure how to quickly translate Труба зовет]
Take the forward post!
I don't care if you want to go or not.
Go and that's it!
Don't argue about the Party discipline.
You have to go on station!
noted
China has allocated 27.3 bln yuan for coronavirus control
viewed from Central Europe, it's a mind-boggling amount of money;
anyway follow the link
if interested
... and as of now on top of Glob. Times webpage there's Wuhan pneumonia sectionOne little suggestion. To avoid potential stereotyping and discrimination, the WHO and all other international health care bodies have decided to avoid using the name of the originating location (cities and countries) in the name of a virus. I would suggest that we stop using "wuhan virus" and ...
... and as of now on top of Glob. Times webpage there's Wuhan pneumonia section
()
Yes, some people do it the right way, and others do it the wrong way. Do we stick to the right way, or should we start doing the wrong things just because someone else does the wrong things too?
My interpretation of your above post is that you disagree with my suggestion not to use Wuhan? Am I right? Clearly, the official name of the virus does not include Wuhan. I suggest that we should stick to the official name. I don't understand why you find that inappropriate...