At this rate, wouldn't the country reach herd immunity from omnicron in 80 days?621,328 new daily COVID-19 cases, and a daily record 429 deaths.
At this rate, wouldn't the country reach herd immunity from omnicron in 80 days?621,328 new daily COVID-19 cases, and a daily record 429 deaths.
本土病例1226例,其中含28例由无症状感染者转为确诊病例(吉林11例,山东10例,天津5例,上海1例,贵州1例):
吉林742例,其中吉林市455例、长春市268例、四平市11例、延边朝鲜族自治州6例、松原市2例;
福建99例,其中泉州市92例、厦门市5例、三明市1例、宁德市1例;
广东83例,其中深圳市71例、东莞市7例、广州市4例、珠海市1例;
辽宁62例,其中大连市38例、营口市21例、沈阳市3例;
天津48例,其中武清区21例、西青区10例、滨海新区6例、红桥区5例、南开区4例、河西区1例、宝坻区1例;
河北38例,其中沧州市26例、廊坊市12例;
山东36例,其中滨州市14例、青岛市10例、威海市6例、临沂市2例、德州市2例、淄博市1例、烟台市1例;
浙江27例,其中衢州市17例、嘉兴市9例、绍兴市1例;
陕西26例,其中宝鸡市14例、铜川市4例、汉中市4例、西安市2例、咸阳市2例;
黑龙江16例,均在哈尔滨市;甘肃12例,其中兰州市8例、兰州新区4例;
上海8例,其中嘉定区4例、徐汇区2例、黄浦区1例、闵行区1例;
广西7例,均在钦州市;
江苏5例,其中连云港市3例、常州市2例;
云南5例,其中德宏傣族景颇族自治州3例、昆明市1例、红河哈尼族彝族自治州1例;
北京4例,其中东城区3例、朝阳区1例;
重庆4例,其中沙坪坝区2例、巴南区1例、江津区1例;
贵州2例,均在遵义市;安徽1例,在铜陵市;
江西1例,在南昌市。
吉林415例,其中吉林市400例、延边朝鲜族自治州6例、长春市5例、四平市4例;
河北178例,其中廊坊市169例、沧州市9例;
上海150例,其中浦东新区43例、嘉定区36例、闵行区17例、宝山区11例、虹口区10例、黄浦区8例、徐汇区5例、长宁区4例、普陀区4例、松江区4例、静安区3例、杨浦区2例、奉贤区2例、青浦区1例;
山东96例,其中威海市50例、淄博市15例、青岛市8例、滨州市8例、烟台市7例、潍坊市7例、德州市1例;
辽宁94例,其中大连市75例、沈阳市14例、营口市4例、阜新市1例;
广东70例,其中东莞市45例、深圳市20例、广州市2例、汕尾市2例、惠州市1例;
江苏67例,其中南京市26例、常州市18例、连云港市14例、苏州市7例、无锡市1例、镇江市1例;
福建42例,其中泉州市41例、龙岩市1例;
云南24例,其中德宏傣族景颇族自治州23例、红河哈尼族彝族自治州1例;
广西23例,其中钦州市11例、崇左市10例、柳州市1例、防城港市1例;
黑龙江13例,均在哈尔滨市;安徽10例,其中马鞍山市6例、铜陵市4例;
甘肃8例,其中兰州市6例、兰州新区2例;
天津7例,其中滨海新区4例、武清区2例、西青区1例;
内蒙古4例,均在通辽市;
浙江4例,其中杭州市2例、嘉兴市2例;
重庆1例,在沙坪坝区。
Likely, probably peak soon.At this rate, wouldn't the country reach herd immunity from omnicron in 80 days?
Is the only hope for China to wait until every surrounding country achieves herd immunity from COVID? Is that even a feasible scenario, considering the likelihood of future variants? The most recent outbreak was from Hong Kong.Likely, probably peak soon.
New variants would emerge making herd immunity useless. A new wave of covid is coming to EU after just peak a couple months ago. Only hope is covid to become less lethal but the increase of contagious of covid is a concern.Is the only hope for China to wait until every surrounding country achieves herd immunity from COVID? Is that even a feasible scenario, considering the likelihood of future variants? The most recent outbreak was from Hong Kong.
I know this has been asked a million times, but if that's the case then what is China's end game here?New variants would emerge making herd immunity useless. A new wave of covid is coming to EU after just peak a couple months ago. Only hope is covid to become less lethal but the increase of contagious of covid is a concern.
Here are the musts from the looks of it:I know this has been asked a million times, but if that's the case then what is China's end game here?
The only solution I see is to wait until COVID evolves to something on the level of the common flu, and then gradually open up. I say this because subsequent variants have generally been increasingly mild. I am not a doctor, so I am not sure if this is possible.
From the Chinese government's perspective, China has dodged the original covid, Alpha and Delta variants bullets by being extremely cautious. China's economy is in a better shape than most countries and up until now its strategy has been a win for China. Understandably, the costs and benefits of zero covid are under threat from Omicron B2 variant but China seems to be determined in containing Omicron.I know this has been asked a million times, but if that's the case then what is China's end game here?
The only solution I see is to wait until COVID evolves to something on the level of the common flu, and then gradually open up. I say this because subsequent variants have generally been increasingly mild. I am not a doctor, so I am not sure if this is possible.
比如出院后的管理,隔离14天还是21天?当然,一般认为隔离越久越安全,但是制定出院后管理这方面的方案,我们要进行科学制定。现在定下来7天,7天必须有充足科学依据,当病毒载量到了一定低程度以后,就不再具有传染性了,居家7天再做一次核酸检测符合病毒很低的水平就可以了。对于普通老百姓来讲,以前出院到隔离点待两个礼拜,现在改成出院居家监测7天再做核酸,这是一次大调整,科学依据要通过足够科学数据来保证。
第二,病毒低到多低才没有传染性?现在看到病毒都喜欢讲CT值,认为越低越好,但一旦越低越好就不科学。比如有些病人4个月都不转阴,是不是意味着我们要把这个人在定点医院隔离4个月呢?肯定要给出一个最科学核酸出院的标准。是不是当核酸水平低到一定程度后,出院就不再具有传染性了?什么样的核酸水平能让风险足够低,又是我们能够忍受最少最短的隔离天数?
现在这个标准比以前出现了大调整。基于国际上连续两年多的抗疫,大家做了大量科学研究出来标准,这次标准调低也是一个非常重大的调整,意味着我们不会在医院隔离非常久的时间,换句话说,出院的人就可以提早了。现在上海平均住院天数是15天,但是核酸一调整可能降低到10天,以前还要隔离两周,现在就可以居家了。
还有一个是医疗机构里重点讨论分层救治、分层治疗。我们会把病人按照轻症、重症还有高危因素进行分层,轻型、普通型都要进行分层,轻症病人和无症状的人会隔离在指定具有医疗条件的隔离点进行观察,我们可以留出更多医疗资源救治重症病人。通过这几个重大标准的制定,会为我们未来抗疫腾出空间。会感觉病人出院更快了,医院轻症可以集中收治了,重症收治在定点医院。集中救治的点也是具有一定医疗观测、监测能力的。分层管理的方式会对医疗资源的优化带来大量所需要医疗资源冗余度提升,未来抗疫我们心里就有把握了。
未来有几个非常重要的条件:疫苗保护、治疗能力提升和充足医疗冗余度。在这次新闻发布会上,我传递给大家的信息是这三个方面都有了很大改变,哪怕是治疗药物方面小分子药物,中国自己的抗体药里面都有,以前没有效果的或者效果不确定的药物全部被删除,我不再介绍。
The problem with "zero covid" policy is that, the other countries are not implementing the same policy. So it looks like China will not be able to open up its border, as that will import many new variant cases. In the meantime, what China can do is to keep boosting people with updated vaccines and stocking up on anti-viral drugs.Is the only hope for China to wait until every surrounding country achieves herd immunity from COVID? Is that even a feasible scenario, considering the likelihood of future variants? The most recent outbreak was from Hong Kong.