I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but I think, objectively, we need to keep an open mind.Trust me, the novel coronavirus comes from nature.
Here's the abstract of a paper that points out an interesting fact:
Among numerous point mutation differences between the SARS-CoV-2 and the bat RaTG13 coronavirus, only the 12-nucleotide furin cleavage site (FCS) exceeds 3 nucleotides. A BLAST search revealed that a 19 nucleotide portion of the SARS.Cov2 genome encompassing the furing cleavage site is a 100% complementary match to a codon-optimized proprietary sequence that is the reverse complement of the human mutS homolog (MSH3). The reverse complement sequence present in SARS-CoV-2 may occur randomly but other possibilities must be considered. Recombination in an intermediate host is an unlikely explanation. Single stranded RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 utilize negative strand RNA templates in infected cells, which might lead through copy choice recombination with a negative sense SARS-CoV-2 RNA to the integration of the MSH3 negative strand, including the FCS, into the viral genome. In any case, the presence of the 19-nucleotide long RNA sequence including the FCS with 100% identity to the reverse complement of the MSH3 mRNA is highly unusual and requires further investigations.
Here are the relevant points:
- Many mutations exist among the bat RaTG13 coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2.
- These mutations (and typical mutations) are typically 3 nucleotides long.
- Only 1 mutation is more than 3 nucleotides long. It s 12 nucleotide long.
- This sequence is an exact complementary match to a patented sequence.
- While this could be the result of random chance, this chance is exceedingly small.
This video explains this in more detail and in layman terms:
We certainly can't conclude anything from this. But we also can't rule out that it's a result of human activity, just because it's so unusual that the mutation is so long and happens to be related to a patent from Moderna.