Coronavirus 2019-2020 thread (no unsubstantiated rumours!)

vesicles

Colonel
OK, but if the entire genomic similarity including introns is some 99% between humans and chimps, 96% really doesn't sound too high for 2 coronaviruses.
But viruses mutate a lot faster than mammals. Such high similarities between two cousins is significant. But as you mentioned earlier, I’ll have to find actual sources to back my point. It’ll take some time for me as wifi is kind of spotty here.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
But viruses mutate a lot faster than mammals. Such high similarities between two cousins is significant. But as you mentioned earlier, I’ll have to find actual sources to back my point. It’ll take some time for me as wifi is kind of spotty here.
OK, take your time. As I said, I prefer the sources to show a chart of different strains of coronaviridae and how much they typically differ from each other so we can judge ourselves. I hope it is free from political influence as in it should not be from some America/British/Aussie scientist trying to interpret and argue that China's responsible for COVID.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Breakthrough mRNA vaccine developed for cancer immunotherapy by Chinese scientists

Breakthrough research from China was able to reprogram the immune system to shrink tumour cells and prevent tumours spreading.


Wednesday 17 February 2021 13:23, UK

Research involving messenger RNA (mRNA) has accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, and scientists are now reporting a new vaccine for cancer immunotherapy.

Similar to COVID-19 vaccines, Chinese scientists have developed a new mRNA vaccine that activates the immune system to attack a protein made by tumour cells instead of the protein produced by the coronavirus.

Crucially, this mRNA is contained in a breakthrough hydrogel developed by the team from the Chinese National Centre for Nanoscience and Technology, that, when injected into mice with melanoma, slowly released the RNA which successfully caused tumours to shrink and prevented them from metastasising.

Both of the COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna use mRNA to send genetic instructions to the body's cells that result in them producing antibodies for the coronavirus without the virus actually being introduced to their body.

The mRNA cancer treatment, reported in the American Chemical Society's Nano Letters, works in a similar way - by entering antigen-presenting cells and making the tumour protein, triggering other immune cells to seek and destroy real tumour cells that also make this protein.

The challenge is that mRNA is generally a very unstable molecule that is quickly degraded by enzymes in the body.

Scientists have tried using nanoparticles to protect the mRNA when it is delivered, but these particles are generally cleared from the body too quickly after injection - typically one or two days.

Researchers Guangjun Nie, Hai Wang and their colleagues, developed a hydrogel that, when injected under the skin, slowly releases these mRNA nanoparticles along with an adjuvant, an agent that helps activate the immune response.

Their treatment was developed using ovalbumin, a protein found in chicken egg white, as a model antigen - so the team mixed ovalbumin mRNA and the adjuvant with other compounds to form the hydrogel.

When injected under the skin of mice with melanoma tumours - engineered to express the ovalbumin protein - the hydrogel slowly released mRNA over the course of a month, rather than just one or two days.

With enough time in the body, the mRNA vaccine successfully activated T-cells and stimulated antibody production, causing the tumours to shrink in the treated mice.

The researchers note that in contrast to untreated mice, the vaccinated mice did not show the cancer metastasising and spreading to their lungs.

"These results demonstrate that the hydrogel has great potential for achieving long-lasting and efficient cancer immunotherapy with only a single treatment," the researchers say.
 

vesicles

Colonel
OK, take your time. As I said, I prefer the sources to show a chart of different strains of coronaviridae and how much they typically differ from each other so we can judge ourselves. I hope it is free from political influence as in it should not be from some America/British/Aussie scientist trying to interpret and argue that China's responsible for COVID.
Found something. Did a rough read on this article below. It seems its section 4 says that different coronaviruses share 54% sequence homology. This sounds a little too divergent to me though... I’ll need to go over it more carefully. I am also looking for the potential sequence differences among different SARS-CoV2 variants.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

vesicles

Colonel
OK, take your time. As I said, I prefer the sources to show a chart of different strains of coronaviridae and how much they typically differ from each other so we can judge ourselves. I hope it is free from political influence as in it should not be from some America/British/Aussie scientist trying to interpret and argue that China's responsible for COVID.
This is another study analyzing the sequence differences among different SARS-CoV2 variants that came along since the start of the pandemic. They found 1500 nucleotide changes. The entire genome of SARS-CoV2 is about 29,8111 nucleotide. So the differences would be about 5% among different SARS-CoV2 variants.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
This is another study analyzing the sequence differences among different SARS-CoV2 variants that came along since the start of the pandemic. They found 1500 nucleotide changes. The entire genome of SARS-CoV2 is about 29,8111 nucleotide. So the differences would be about 5% among different SARS-CoV2 variants.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
OK, I see. I would have thought that coronaviruses were a lot more similar to each other. So what is your interpretation of this on the likelihood and origin of SARS-COV-2?
 

vesicles

Colonel
OK, I see. I would have thought that coronaviruses were a lot more similar to each other. So what is your interpretation of this on the likelihood and origin of SARS-COV-2?
Honestly, I can’t tell you now. I only found the article a few minutes ago. I only scanned through the whole thing to look for some % numbers and see if I can get some useful info to answer your question. I’ll need to go over it more carefully.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Honestly, I can’t tell you now. I only found the article a few minutes ago. I only scanned through the whole thing to look for some % numbers and see if I can get some useful info to answer your question. I’ll need to go over it more carefully.
It's a complicated question and with this virus all over the place infecting bats, pangolins, even tigers, lions, and who knows what other species. it's very hard to say which direction something jumped or where it jumped from and easy to come to a false conclusion by accidental assumptions assumptions.
 
Top