we are off topic now .. this is my last reply on this topic.Is MA-700 equipped with AES-500 engines? It performed 3 test flights with those engines?
Besides some important construction components, the real advantage of the MC-21 over the C919 is that it will be immune to any sanctions that put the production of the aircraft at risk since everything will be made in Russia.
There are precedents, remember the Chinese MA-700 already from the start of production of the prototype, but even more so the Russian SSJ-100 Superjet which was already in production and from night to morning was left without the components produced in the countries that imposed sanctions , including the engines which were half produced in France, without new components and without spare parts.
Now they are taking action and the aircraft will be completely Russian, but time will be needed to do this.
So to repeat myself, the major superiority of the MC-21 and also the new SJ-100 is that they are immune to today's or tomorrow's sanctions
That increase in MC-21 weight tidbit comes from a bullshit report by Kommersant. You should not put any credence to it. Kommersant has always had a liberal slant. So of course any state run program is supposed to be a basket case.Even in the near future, I doubt that after the substitution of imported material, the new self-sufficient versions of MC-21 and SSJ-100 would still be able to meet their original specifications which was set before the sanction. There already are reports saying that the new domestic MC-21 will be 6 tons heaver than the prototype which was built before the sanction. I guess most carbon fiber composite parts have been replaced by aluminum alloy from Brezhnev-era.
That increase in MC-21 weight tidbit comes from a bullshit report by Kommersant. You should not put any credence to it. Kommersant has always had a liberal slant. So of course any state run program is supposed to be a basket case.
People in the actual industry already said that the Kommersant article is totally bogus. They basically confused an increase in maximum takeoff weight of the aircraft with an increase in the actual weight of the aircraft. The maximum takeoff weight was increased after further static tests of the airframe. I need not remind you that an increase in maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and thus payload is a good thing. Not a bad thing. The journalists at Kommersant are complete retards.
Another bogus claim Kommersant made was that the MC-21 does not meet the required max speed parameter. But the thing is they conflate the maximum allowed speed parameter for the prototypes acting under flight law restraints with what the aircraft can actually do. And will achieve once testing is over.
All reports we have on the Russian carbon composites claim similar weight for same specifications. The Russians have worse quality fibers (used to be imported from Japan), but stronger adhesive (used to be imported from the US) than the former imports. The resulting composite material (used to be imported from Europe) meets the required strength and weight parameters.
This is the company which makes the carbon fibers and composites:
the modernity of design has impact on operational cost if it leads to lighter aircraft. But there are many other factors that affect the operational cost of moder airlines. A220 is fully booked out, because it has the best economics of its size. Did you know that Airbus is still losing money on A220 it is selling? And it has to do that because if it's selling it at the same margin it gets on A320NEO, then it's economics would be inferior.@tphuang you seem to be addressing prior posts of mine instead of that specific one you quoted.
Good counters to your argument are how the Airbus A220 is fully booked out. How airlines pushed Airbus into making the composite A350. The lackluster sales of the conventional Airbus A330 after the introduction of the composite Boeing 787.
The modernity of the design has a direct impact on operational costs.
In the case of SSJ the Russians simply could not get foreign maintenance working properly. While there was an issue with the French designed combustors in the SaM-146 engine other aircraft also had engine issues. And this is papered over with support and maintenance. As for Interjet what really did them in was COVID-19.
That increase in MC-21 weight tidbit comes from a bullshit report by Kommersant. You should not put any credence to it. Kommersant has always had a liberal slant. So of course any state run program is supposed to be a basket case.
People in the actual industry already said that the Kommersant article is totally bogus. They basically confused an increase in maximum takeoff weight of the aircraft with an increase in the actual weight of the aircraft. The maximum takeoff weight was increased after further static tests of the airframe. I need not remind you that an increase in maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) and thus payload is a good thing. Not a bad thing. The journalists at Kommersant are complete retards.
Another bogus claim Kommersant made was that the MC-21 does not meet the required max speed parameter. But the thing is they conflate the maximum allowed speed parameter for the prototypes acting under flight law restraints with what the aircraft can actually do. And will achieve once testing is over.
All reports we have on the Russian carbon composites claim similar weight for same specifications. The Russians have worse quality fibers (used to be imported from Japan), but stronger adhesive (used to be imported from the US) than the former imports. The resulting composite material (used to be imported from Europe) meets the required strength and weight parameters.
This is the company which makes the carbon fibers and composites: