As I have been saying in multiple threads about multiple tech topics, testing and verification is the hardest and most time consuming part of any technology, and commercial is always more demanding of consistency and high tolerances than military or research. These are necessary teething pains for Chinese industry. The only way out is through. The C919 is a sacrificial lamb for this learning process. If COMAC is serious about learning and growing as an organization things will get easier after this.According to this video,the ability to examine and certify an commercial plane is even harder than designing one, this is an area China is particularly weak compare to the West. C-919 has been stuck in testing phase for several years already,this news from 2021/12/03 says that there is a total of 3273 test points and 276 flight test,1694 test points and 34 flight test have been completed as of now. So there is still a lot of testing work remains, the date that C-919 can finally be delivered to airline is still unclear at this moment.
Russia already had proven passenger aircraft systems from Tu-204.Since it was only under Trump that civilian aircraft industry was subjected to sanctions ( just two years ago), its incredible for Russia to have substituted all the systems with indigenous ones.
Not that I don't believe it. I do question the quality of the reworked product.Let's hope Russia figures this out because C929 needs the success.
As i said, the quality is upto debate. You and me and most out there know that the Russian solutions won't be as good ( under the lenses of global airlines).Russia already had proven passenger aircraft systems from Tu-204.
Same reasons COMAC did, simplifies regulatory compliance and customer acquisition. Noticing a pattern?As i said, the quality is upto debate. You and me and most out there know that the Russian solutions won't be as good ( under the lenses of global airlines).
Btw, why did MC-21 program ever source systems from US/French/Israeli providers in the first place ? Same with the PW engines.
Exactly. But even without regulatory hurdles, I think it'd be naïve to conclude that Russian systems (and avionics esp) are qualitatively as competitive as EU/US solutions(it's circular, as regulations keep up with advancements in technology). Much capital has went into the latter.Same reasons COMAC did, simplifies regulatory compliance and customer acquisition. Noticing a pattern?
Highly doubtful Russia today would have as much difficulty with quality if they went full ingenious. Those 90s and early 2000s issues with quality were a result of an ailing economy not being able to provide sufficient resources, not a lack of know how. Very different situation today.Exactly. But evewithout regulatory hurdles, I think it'd be naïve to conclude that Russian systems (and avionics esp) are qualitatively as competitive as EU/US solutions(it's circular, as regulations keep up with advancements in technology). Much capital has went into the latter.
Anyway, most of us are agreeing and nodding our heads here. No use in that. Fingers crossed for C919.
As i said, the quality is upto debate. You and me and most out there know that the Russian solutions won't be as good ( under the lenses of global airlines).
Btw, why did MC-21 program ever source systems from US/French/Israeli providers in the first place ? Same with the PW engines.
I doubt it. Irkut has yet to decide on a provider for Avionics ( as of 2020). How they plan to replace Collins and Honeywell is unclear. EU systems ( French, German) are another and the Ukraine situation isn't looking good.Highly doubtful Russia today would have as much difficulty with quality if they went full ingenious. Those 90s and early 2000s issues with quality were a result of an ailing economy not being able to provide sufficient resources, not a lack of know how. Very different situation today.
It's better to be bad than nothing. The goal should be to make a sanctions proof domestic system. Trying for FAA regulatory approval is probably not going to happen at this point.
What makes passenger jets avionics so much more challenging than military transport?I doubt it. Irkut has yet to decide on a provider for Avionics ( as of 2020). How they plan to replace Collins and Honeywell is unclear. EU systems ( French, German) are another and the Ukraine situation isn't looking good.
Indeed, we may boil it rather than fry. We are also ready to wait. But where's the egg? I can't find any news about an Avionics breakthrough from Irkut. Even the sukhoi Superjet used French Avionics (Thales).