Actually, digging out some notes I had when 9000s first came out, I'm now confused by why Techinsights claimed "no change in process". The dimensions of 9000s process are:
CPP: 63nm, fin pitch: 33nm, metal pitch: 42nm
Now, I see some reports say that the dimensions of 9020 are:
CPP: 63nm, fin pitch: 31nm, metal pitch: 40nm
So, there is a reduction of transistor dimensions here. But, maybe they just feel these reductions are too incremental to call a "change in process". But anyway, these dimensions are still in 7nm territory, so it's fair to still call it N+2 and nothing more.
CPP: 63nm, fin pitch: 33nm, metal pitch: 42nm
Now, I see some reports say that the dimensions of 9020 are:
CPP: 63nm, fin pitch: 31nm, metal pitch: 40nm
So, there is a reduction of transistor dimensions here. But, maybe they just feel these reductions are too incremental to call a "change in process". But anyway, these dimensions are still in 7nm territory, so it's fair to still call it N+2 and nothing more.