Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

WTAN

Junior Member
Registered Member
@WTAN Sir the hint's are getting visible, One must connect the dot just like in PLA watching, the evidences are there, its up to us to look for it. One of those is the Official announcement from Huawei about the Return of the King in 2023, the second about the delivery of the prototype SMEE DUVL in December 2020 which correlate @Oldschool post of SMEE SSA800 DUVL doing verification work by SMIC Chengdu FAB in July this year , third about Huawei breakthrough in 14nm 3D stacking tech. These kind of progress will never be reported by the Western Media and the Chinese are tight lip except IF you can read Chinese. My concern is that the Dual Approach strategy is stymied, SMIC 7nm projected mass production date will be delayed by 2 years the most, extending the gap already existed between the 2 leaders, even IF a 7nm 3D chiplet is mass produce in 2024, by that time TSMC and Samsung 3nm is up and running.
If the Biden Admin goes ahead with the plans against SMIC, yes it could cause some delays with the 7nm mass production.
But given that the restrictions are only on processes below the 14nm node, SMIC should still be able to operate the Shanghai FAB with the 1980i DUVL.
It could still begin smaller scale 7nm production for clients with the existing facilities.
For larger scale production it would have to wait till a proper 14nm Localised production line is up and running in 2022/2023.

But the good thing about the latest restrictions is that it will force SMIC to completely switch to local Equipment for Advanced nodes like 7nm and smaller.
Another thing is that SMIC also has an interest in 3D Packaging and it will probably produce 3D ICs for clients while waiting for the arrival of the locally made EUVL.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
If the Biden Admin goes ahead with the plans against SMIC, yes it could cause some delays with the 7nm mass production.
But given that the restrictions are only on processes below the 14nm node, SMIC should still be able to operate the Shanghai FAB with the 1980i DUVL.
It could still begin smaller scale 7nm production for clients with the existing facilities.
For larger scale production it would have to wait till a proper 14nm Localised production line is up and running in 2022/2023.

But the good thing about the latest restrictions is that it will force SMIC to completely switch to local Equipment for Advanced nodes like 7nm and smaller.
Another thing is that SMIC also has an interest in 3D Packaging and it will probably produce 3D ICs for clients while waiting for the arrival of the locally made EUVL.
@WTAN Sir a novice question, if the total ban on SMIC is given the green light, how about the spare parts and service agreement with ASML? and since SMEE SSA800 is comparable to NXT 1980i can they be interchange and used some parts like the light source (RS LASER)? it's the only equipment that contain US technology.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
The destiny of most highly technical product segments is getting monopolized by a few anyway.

Just to expand, highly technical products tend to have large upfront development costs and timescales.

So on a commercial basis, you need to invest a lot at the beginning but then have a monopoly with prices to match.
And if competitors want to compete, they know that they will also need to invest upfront.
But they also know that you can undercut them by selling the final product for a lot less.
After all, you're further on the manufacturing productivity curve and have recovered some/all of your development costs.

So that is the economic basis of why this happens.
 
Last edited:

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
The key line is "China-made lithography equipment has not entered wafer mass production lines"; This is a huge weakness in the whole system it's like not controlling oil production in previous generations. It's tough to solve as as they are one of three countries capable of achieving this but the progress has been slow and the ramifications are quite large... You read about advances here and there but if nothing is actually being used in mass production it's pretty bad...
writer's background is from Caixin in financial risk management. He is not a subject matter expert.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think they are talking about the FrontEnd IC lithography market, an area were ASML has a monopoly in China and SMEE is a bit late in the area, hopefully with the new Arf immersion litho machines and the pressure of US sanctions they can start the virtuous cycle of development in the FrontEnd area of integrated circuit production.
It can at least be used for 65 nm - 90 nm ICs for power, microcontroller, etc. a mid 2000's level chip still can drive graphics, handle vast majority of computations, and can be more easily ruggedized for embedded applications.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
There are only two weeks left in the year, so unless there is some dramatic surprise coming out of left field in the next 15 days, a domestic 28nm line this year isn't happening.

Further, even if you ignore the motivating effect of US sanctions, the fact remains that China achieved 90nm supposedly in 2016. Even in the normal course of events it should have made some progress in the last five years, yet its most advanced machine is still 90nm and even this machine, seems to have negligible sales. On this board there is a lot of (1) posting rumors and (2) boasting, and I am sure someone will reply to my comment with more rhetoric meant to puff up China and temporarily make us feel better, but the reality is, China's efforts haven't been showing any results. The US is just having a field day shooting at China with no response.

Further, the Chinese government far from supporting China's tech sector is cracking down on it and making it hard for it to raise money. Chinese tech companies have taken a bath this year much due to the Chinese government's own policies. In many ways the Chinese and US governments are both aligned and pursuing the same goals against Chinese tech (such as attacking Chinese overseas IPOs). Meanwhile the US is supporting its own tech sector massively with huge bills and all sorts of pressures. Sigh.
wrong yet again. 'tech company' is a meaningless media buzzword. Chinese government is cracking down on software services which has nothing to do with semiconductor and is indeed redirecting capital.

it is very hard to talk with people like you who are neither subject matter experts nor willing to learn. so far you have only demonstrated profound ignorance and a lack of willingness to learn even the most rudimentary facts about the industry.
 

WTAN

Junior Member
Registered Member
@WTAN Sir a novice question, if the total ban on SMIC is given the green light, how about the spare parts and service agreement with ASML? and since SMEE SSA800 is comparable to NXT 1980i can they be interchange and used some parts like the light source (RS LASER)? it's the only equipment that contain US technology.
The light source on the 1980i could probably be replaced by RSLaser with some modifications but the other parts probably not.
An example is Gigaphoton which supplies its Arf Light Source to many clients of many types of older DUVL.
The best bet for SMIC is to sue ASML under the Entity List Laws and force them to continue supporting ASML DUVLs.
ASML will have no choice but to comply or the Chinese Authorities will penalise them and even throw them out of the country.
 

AF-1

Junior Member
Registered Member
ASML, TSMC and everybody else will try to replace as much as possible American components from their supply chains...
That is the only way for them to remain competitive in the future and do business as they want. Of course for American market, and puppet states markets they can keep current tech (i am reffering to ASML mostly).
 

Pendemic

New Member
Registered Member
There are only two weeks left in the year, so unless there is some dramatic surprise coming out of left field in the next 15 days, a domestic 28nm line this year isn't happening.

Further, even if you ignore the motivating effect of US sanctions, the fact remains that China achieved 90nm supposedly in 2016. Even in the normal course of events it should have made some progress in the last five years, yet its most advanced machine is still 90nm and even this machine, seems to have negligible sales. On this board there is a lot of (1) posting rumors and (2) boasting, and I am sure someone will reply to my comment with more rhetoric meant to puff up China and temporarily make us feel better, but the reality is, China's efforts haven't been showing any results. The US is just having a field day shooting at China with no response.

Further, the Chinese government far from supporting China's tech sector is cracking down on it and making it hard for it to raise money. Chinese tech companies have taken a bath this year much due to the Chinese government's own policies. In many ways the Chinese and US governments are both aligned and pursuing the same goals against Chinese tech (such as attacking Chinese overseas IPOs). Meanwhile the US is supporting its own tech sector massively with huge bills and all sorts of pressures. Sigh.
Chinese tech companies taking a bath - that’s a half truth. The Chinese government has cracked down hard on predatory monopolistic platforms like Ant Financial, Alibaba, JD, Tencent, Didi, Meituan as well as recalcitrant companies which despite moral suasion from the government, insisted on listing on Nasdaq/NYSE. Most of these are not really hardcore tech companies.

Companies that thrive on creating bad habits for average people like encouraging excessive borrowings, 24/7 gaming and profiteering from exclusive private tuition for kids who are already burdened with normal school work are also targeted. Same goes for companies with platforms that prods citizens to make oversized bets on property and cryptocurrencies. IMO, mining of the latter is an unnecessary and totally unproductive distraction.

We have seen many reports that Beijing is quietly setting up massive funds to subsidize real R&D and strong arming companies who were once implacable rivals to cooperate and adopt common standards designed in China. So it’s mostly positive moves from the Central Government.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top