Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xizor

Captain
Registered Member
Huawei doesn't answer to external investors. Huawei is legally a worker's collective owned by the employees of Huawei so as long as they make enough revenue to cover operational costs including wages, they're OK.
I am aware of that. That employee owns the company and the uniqueness it grants. However, annual statements and such won't be disregarded and is of interest to every stakeholder.

Most companies fail because they don't see the forest for the trees or trees for the forest. I am reserving my criticism of Huawei only because I still don't understand the dynamics between Huawei and Chinese Government or even a state entity like CETC.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I am aware of that. That employee owns the company and the uniqueness it grants. However, annual statements and such won't be disregarded and is of interest to every stakeholder.

Most companies fail because they don't see the forest for the trees or trees for the forest. I am reserving my criticism of Huawei only because I still don't understand the dynamics between Huawei and Chinese Government or even a state entity like CETC.
By not answering to investors, Huawei can accept profit margins and risks that an ordinary private or listed company cannot.

Huawei hasn't failed either. It has instead been wildly successful.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Huawei doesn't answer to external investors. Huawei is legally a worker's collective owned by the employees of Huawei so as long as they make enough revenue to cover operational costs including wages, they're OK.

Thats a very good point of Huawei is really true cooperative company, and huge and profitable. I believe this is one of the main reasons that the US as a "pure" capitalist is so scared of the successful of Huawei ... a very good example that cooperative does work

Just a note that the biggest company in NZ is also a pure cooperative company, owned by farmers, Fonterra
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Its my opinion that we must try to allow pessimism to take control of this thread. As turn-off as it may sound, this thread can get really high on hot air like a Hot air balloon.

As part of this pessimism, it is important to presume that every breakthrough China makes is not commercially viable ( as in not fit for mass production applications - even if the spokespersons/leakers/sources insist on them being mass production ready ).

Regarding the underlined part, I think that is perhaps a bit much.

It is certainly important to not assume that every breakthrough is commercially viable, but I think assuming every breakthrough is not commercially viable is also excessive. Especially because a new technology or process that may be initially non-viable may become commercially viable with iterations.
There's also the fact that China's semiconductor industry and access isn't exactly a free market as a result of US sanctions anyhow, so what is "commercially viable" might mean something different in China.



Also, it is important to scale back expectations of rapid rise as there is considerable difference between lab success and fab success. Allow the thread to be pessimistic for it improves the quality of the thread. Very often are the readers here taken on a roller coaster ride. When will you learn?

A pessimistic me is still waiting for the 14nm mass production initiation and semiconductor chips from that fab hitting the market.

I agree with the general sentiment that I think some of the members here post too many random articles and videos the quality and significance of which is dubious. But at the same time I think various benchmarks and milestone updates from other members is quite important and useful and so far seems to have tracked pretty accurately with news reports that subsequently come out.
Certainly, I think everyone here recognizes the importance of localized DUVL and EUVL machines and subsuppliers.

I'm not sure why you'd be awaiting for 14nm mass production, given the domestic 28nm DUVL by all indicators has only recently had its initial units delivered, and a localized 14nm line is not expected until next year at the earliest.
Unless you're talking about a 14nm process in general (i.e.: non localized), in which case SMIC's 14nm line that produces SoCs such as Kirin 710A has existed since early 2020.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Need an account to fully read it. I will quote some IMO important sections
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Alibaba’s new server chip will help expand the Chinese e-commerce giant’s domestic and global cloud computing business
But it also marks a notable step forward in China’s greater drive for a self-sufficient semiconductor industry, which could place Alibaba in the United States’ crosshairs.
Should Alibaba and domestic cloud rivals Baidu and Tencent become global competitors in chip design for cloud computing, the United States may impose restrictions to slow down their advancement or prevent access to U.S. technology.
Cloud computing will face the same level of national security concerns in the United States. U.S. President Joe Biden has not formally backed Trump’s so-called “Clean Network” strategy, which identified cloud computing as a key target in limiting China’s overall involvement in global tech networks.
But Biden also hasn’t substantially reduced his predecessor’s restrictions on SMIC or Huawei.
If the Republicans take control of the U.S. Congress in 2022 or 2024 or win the presidency in 2024, it would portend more aggressive action against other Chinese semiconductor companies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top