Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Is this guy anywhere reliable, or is he just bullcr4pping? Claiming that China will not just introduce, but commercialize XRL in 10 years to succeed EUV, etc.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
there is a lot of wild rumors coming out these days. I would take a pause on some of this stuff and wait and find out where things truly are. Right now, we are hitting hysteria territory.
Kirin 9000s reveals SMIC can mass produce commercial 7nm chips. Having released the Huawei Mate 60 family without any publicity whatsoever and specially during Gina Raimondo's "visit" to China was a master marketing stroke and a furious slap in the face of the US sanctions.

This has profound geopolitical repercussions and I am pretty sure Huawei got the green light from very high up to let Huawei slap the US in the face.

One can expect fierce reaction from US and friends, possibly forbidding any DUV supplies by ASML to China.

I don't think Huawei would risk such a reaction from the "West" UNLESS China is now capable of mass producing litography machines, at least as good as ASML's 28nm.

It is amazing how quiet SMEE and AMEC have been regarding their achievements.

28nm already accounts for most of the $$$ in chip manufacturing. If you include 14 and 7nm in your manufacturing weapons cartridge, specially if you advance even further with 3D stacking, I am pretty confident China can bankrupt most of the "Western" chip companies by flooding the market with cheaper chips within the next 10 years.

It won't be long before China will do to chips what it did to solar panels.
actually, it doesn't really mean that
based on what I'm hearing, they are very close to delivering 28nm lithography machine, but as we discussed before, quantity is an issue. Remember, supply chain at most can do 20 DUV & DUVi combined per year. China will need ASML for a long time


And I will also say that I hear the entire CIOMP EUV news, we may need to wait for more evidence on that.

While I do think they are close to a prototype and one may have already being assembled. Whether it will first be CIOMP or SIOMis hard to say. And more importantly, it's going to take some time to find out what's likely and what's complete BS

GIVEN that recent EUV news is on such weak news and the opsec China has adopted. I strongly urge everyone here to not tweet about it. It does China no good for any of us to be actively talking about China's EUV progress on twitter.
 

Wahid145

New Member
Registered Member
yeah, AMEC is public company and is the most vocal about their successes

some note from research on them
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


says here for ICP, it's being used in 17nm and under DRAM processes. I assume it must have entered samsung & SK supply chain


looks like its LPCVD product also met requirements

Its CCP product can be used in 5nm logic process and 200+ layer 3D Nand process
Really happy with how AMEC is turning out to be. Looks like they are gonna be a true LAM Competitor. Both Naura and Piotech need to step up their game too and match AMEC. For some reason, it feels like Naura is not trying to be cutting edge like AMEC, they are more like, we want to cover the old processes (28 nm and beyond)
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
Really happy with how AMEC is turning out to be. Looks like they are gonna be a true LAM Competitor. Both Naura and Piotech need to step up their game too and match AMEC. For some reason, it feels like Naura is not trying to be cutting edge like AMEC, they are more like, we want to cover the old processes (28 nm and beyond)
AMEC is one of Piotech investors and I think they shared plasma technology to compete with Naura.
 

cctang

New Member
Registered Member
The more I ponder, it seems like the Huawei / SMIC 7nm breakthrough might have a massive impact on industry.

Other than mobile, the use case for advanced nodes beyond 5nm is really not obvious as others have said - costs are extremely high, value relatively low. And Apple primarily leveraged their dominant market position in high end phones to keep pushing the edge here.

What happens if/when Apple loses 1/3 of their revenues globally due to a Huawei phone that invests in features outside of shrinking gate sizes? How does TSMC get enough orders to fill their Arizona fabs?

We aren’t going around driving cars with ever increasing # of horsepower, and I suspect we don’t need more EV range beyond a certain number of miles. I suspect the same will be true in smartphones.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
The more I ponder, it seems like the Huawei / SMIC 7nm breakthrough might have a massive impact on industry.

Other than mobile, the use case for advanced nodes beyond 5nm is really not obvious as others have said - costs are extremely high, value relatively low. And Apple primarily leveraged their dominant market position in high end phones to keep pushing the edge here.

Bro food for thought from my mentor @Oldschool

Oldschool

Junior Member​

Registered Member
Today at 5:31 AM
It's good to have a track for how many handsets Huawei sold so far.
17million units sold so far.
What happens if/when Apple loses 1/3 of their revenues globally due to a Huawei phone that invests in features outside of shrinking gate sizes? How does TSMC get enough orders to fill their Arizona fabs?
Easy sell it to American at an exorbitant price, I pity them since they will ban anything Chinese so they have to carry the brunt of their ruling elites stupid decision.

Ohh don't forget Europe and the wanna be white SK and Japan, plus don't discount the Bharats ;) surely they can easily afford a $2,000 Iphone....lol

The golden billion and the slumdog millionaire, they alone can keep Apple afloat, I know cause I just talk to an Indian and they convince me that they can , Yes we can!!!!...lol
We aren’t going around driving cars with ever increasing # of horsepower, and I suspect we don’t need more EV range beyond a certain number of miles. I suspect the same will be true in smartphones.

Oldschool

Junior Member​

Registered Member
Today at 2:42 AM
Don't forget Huawei also announcing the availability of Auto SOC 14nm kirin 9610A. It's twice the capability of Qualcomm 5nm Auto SOC due to in car there's no space constraint, Huawei can build the chip as big as it wants and pack more functionalities inside.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
TBH, reading this, I kinda feel a bit of deja vu here.

That is, similar to the automotive industry in China - Only the strong-willed, exceptionally-innovative and determined-to-survive ones in the smartphone (or high-tech) industries (in-general) deserve to survive. Those weaker ones should be left to their own devices, i.e. either to be completely absorbed by the stronger ones, or be left to wilt and die in the abyss.

If other smartphone companies in China couldn't stand firm against the already long-anticipated pressure of sanctions and bans by the US&LC upon them like how the US&LC had treated Huawei for the last couple of years (mainly due to them being entirely dependent on the whims of the US&LC to survive, and/or being reluctant to innovate and transform in order to adapt to newer, harsher realities), then there should be no place left for them after the storm has passed.

Only those who can survive in the Chinese market on their own will and brute can thrive overseas and then worldwide. China doesn't need zombie companies to sap away precious investment fundings and government support, such as those in Japan after their bubble burst in the early-1990s.
It depend where you are educated, see the difference between OPPO CEO with Huawei and BYD.

Western Graduates are usually complaint and God fearing. ;) ( and they accused the Chinese of brain washing....lol)

While Mainland graduates are fierce, competitive and money worshipping.:cool:
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
The more I ponder, it seems like the Huawei / SMIC 7nm breakthrough might have a massive impact on industry.

Other than mobile, the use case for advanced nodes beyond 5nm is really not obvious as others have said - costs are extremely high, value relatively low. And Apple primarily leveraged their dominant market position in high end phones to keep pushing the edge here.

What happens if/when Apple loses 1/3 of their revenues globally due to a Huawei phone that invests in features outside of shrinking gate sizes? How does TSMC get enough orders to fill their Arizona fabs?

We aren’t going around driving cars with ever increasing # of horsepower, and I suspect we don’t need more EV range beyond a certain number of miles. I suspect the same will be true in smartphones.

Yes, business case for 5nm and beyond isn't great given the 2 factors we talked about (SRAM can't shrink any further and dark silicon limitations)

However, we may want to pause a little bit in wondering about Apple or TSMC demise. I would worry less about TSMC in Arizona and more about how Chinese semi industry can manufacture enough chips for Huawei.

As I discussed, if we anticipate a full cutoff, then they would need for 2024

60 million SoCs for phones (their goal for 2024) + 8 million for pads (quarterly sales routinely around 2 million)
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) + 5 million for desktops/laptops (Q3 2022 sales was a little over 1 million in China alone
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) + 2mill server CPUs + 100k GPUs

Do you want to guess how many 7nm wafers they need for that? My estimate so far is over 20k wpm, which they certainly don't have right now. So over next year at least, they are burning through backlog of chips they have and same with DRAMs and such.

Of course, there are things Huawei is really good at, so it can overcome some of these problems.

But the reality is that it's suppliers need to massively increase investment and capacity/production to satisfy 2024 demand let alone further down the road when Harmony devices get sold outside of China

And this is just 1 company. Do we want to guess how many wafers all of China's OEMs need?

probably 150k wpm. Will it really hurt apple, qualcomm & TSMC if it all goes to SMIC? Of course, but we are a long way from that. Things don't ramp up over night. you need to train people for the extremely complicated multi-patterning process. domestic tools need to continue to improve....

The reality is we hit the first key in a long process.
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Maduro also showed an interest in Chinese smart phone maker Huawei, according to Venezuelan local media.

According to a local television show which aired on September 4, when commenting on the launch of Huawei's latest Mate 60 Pro, Maduro said that he congratulates Huawei on making the technological breakthrough despite years of unjust sanctions and suppression from Western countries.

Maduro also revealed that he is currently using a Huawei smartphone, and he is satisfied with its user experience and security.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top