1. Some Western outlets, including BBC, still have not reported on the story. NYTimes wrote a minor story that got relegated to the side mentions.
They are waiting for indications from Washington. Still no clear message from above, so they don't know if attack or ignore.
As soon as they will get the line, they will proceed accordingly.
They’ve been great for military adjacent and state support heavy industries. When I mean commercial I mean industries that have to answer to stronger market imperatives. I think semis is kind of sitting in the middle of that distinction right now but it will move more and more toward the latter as it matures.
Now that Huawei re-entered the battlefield in great style, this will have an indirect but very deep impact on all China semiconductor ecosystem. Huawei will push suppliers, and indirectly, suppliers of suppliers, and so on until the last researcher in the most obscure state lab.
Regarding the right commercial attitude, none can teach anything to Huawei, they are absolute number one for aggressiveness and determination on the market. They will pull all China ecosystem with them.
If you think about Mate 60 launch, with all its long list of Chinese suppliers, the hidden effect, and for me the most important and strategical sensible, is exactly this, push Chinese suppliers to side with Huawei even (or maybe with the secret real goal) that all suppliers end up in the US entity list, so that is no more US vs Huawei, but US vs China.
That's why I feel all this has been orchestrated, and maybe this is the reason US is now unusually cautious on how to proceed....they sense the trap, but I guess at the end their instinct will prevail, as it has always been, and they will retaliate hard.