We've been reasonably sure that SMIC has been producing Huawei's Ascend chips for a while now, given that the Ascend 910 has listed a significant upgrade to its performance fairly recently. What is intriguing is the "and below" part. Whether that phrase is added for dramatic effect and whether the rumours are true is something we will have to wait and see.This site is locked tight, but maybe someone here knows more about it
Coupled with a looming recession, Yeah the US needs a lot of help....lolA very steep drop in both semiconductor and semiconductor equipment exports from the US to China.
Really interesting, probably related to this patent. Didn't talk about the power and stability of that system, that remain to be seen.
I took a look and have some questions about his light source article
1064纳米激光进晶体,213纳米激光出来,效率2.34%。目前国内外公开报道的1064纳米激光的平均功率万瓦级,论文是50瓦进,1.17瓦出,万瓦可出234瓦的深紫外光,目前5纳米制程的GT66A深紫外光源最大功率也才90瓦
如果觉得213纳米还是长,用拉曼频移激光器我觉得应该可以解决,上海光机所20年前的专利,213纳米充氢气拉曼频移成157纳米(与浸没式光刻竞争失败的光刻波段)的激光,寿命上万小时,成本仅十分之一。213纳米拉曼频移成193纳米光刻波段我觉得也应该不成问题,连光刻胶都不用变
157nm was given up due to many technical factors that were not able to overcome (for 1, very difficult to do immersion).I took a look and have some questions about his light source article
1. The published paper used 50W 1064nm in and got 1.17W 213nm out, hswz assumed similar efficiency can be scaled to tens of kilowatts.
2. Hswz claims we can use raman laser to get higher frequency light say 157nm based on previous patent. Has the previous patent been tested at say 100W+? Second, is it possible/do we have the right materials for getting 213nm -> 193nm with raman laser?