Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

PopularScience

Junior Member
Registered Member
this is just the first part of the link that @PopularScience posted earlier. Do you have a link now to indicate this is from a reputable source?


btw, this was from that article.
Says SMIC & Huawei are two of the customers, who is G家统????


Says here that initial customers are YMTC, SMIC & Shanghai Jita. This year it's for YMTC, Yandong, CXMT, Qing Sien. I thought Yandong already got one

Production rate for 90nm machine is still low


Says HW is involved in EUV project, qualifying 28nm DUVi & it all bought 5 second hand Nikon scanners.


Said it's the latest Type 35 version that can be used for 14nm process


28nm need to pass validation because the project is considered finished. Can only validated on 14nm/7nm with SMIC. 28nm machine's target is NXT2000i, so that it can do 7nm.

most of this sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure about its authenticity. It sounds way too Huawei focused.
G家=国家 goverment
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
this is just the first part of the link that @PopularScience posted earlier. Do you have a link now to indicate this is from a reputable source?


btw, this was from that article.
Says SMIC & Huawei are two of the customers, who is G家统????


Says here that initial customers are YMTC, SMIC & Shanghai Jita. This year it's for YMTC, Yandong, CXMT, Qing Sien. I thought Yandong already got one

Production rate for 90nm machine is still low


Says HW is involved in EUV project, qualifying 28nm DUVi & it all bought 5 second hand Nikon scanners.


Said it's the latest Type 35 version that can be used for 14nm process


28nm need to pass validation because the project is considered finished. Can only validated on 14nm/7nm with SMIC. 28nm machine's target is NXT2000i, so that it can do 7nm.

most of this sounds reasonable, but I'm not sure about its authenticity. It sounds way too Huawei focused.

Havok just debunked this post,so it's fake news

秦声楚舞:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

这个消息靠谱吗?

Havok:上微给ICRD发子系统? ICRD是要自己造光刻机么?

秦声楚舞:Is this news reliable?
Havok:Shangwei issued a subsystem to ICRD?does ICRD want to build its own lithography machine?

Plus as people already said in that Zhihu thread,this news claims that Huawei bought Nikon dry-type lithography machines,and somehow managed to convert it to immersive-type machines. It's just not feasible in practise.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
managed to convert it to immersive-type machines. It's just not feasible in practise.
Is possible to convert dry machines into immersions ones, I think the first production immersion machines where dry to immersion conversions, you wont get 1.35 NA because current immersion machines have dedicated projection lens systems for that but the NA will be above 1. In fact the first plan of SMEE was to adapt an immersion system to their dry 90nm Arf Scanners to allow the system to pattern to 65nm.
That part that I still don't getting is the part of adapting dual wafer stage to a single wafer stage machine. I don't know but dual wafer stages have different vibration mechanics than single wafer stages but guess they could add some adaptations to get it to work.
 

nugroho

Junior Member
No, that's not really how it works. It's not about being able to create 3nm or 5nm chips, it's about being able to sell it. If you spend way too much on R&D and it makes your product absurdly expensive, it doesn't matter if you can mass produce it. On a purely technical level, China's already made 5nm chips. The SMEE lithography machines are already making 14nm chips, possibly 7nm. All this work and delay isn't in being able to make any chip, it's to be able to make them cost effectively. Thus, just pouring money into it isn't a solution.

This all said, this is what really bothers me about USA's lies. China can make any chip it wants for it's military equipment, and probably already does. We're talking 2nm level stuff. This kind of stuff doesn't matter how expensive it is because national security. So what is USA stopping? Certainly not China's military development. This is purely a commercial attack on commerce. The national security nonsense is just an excuse. It's disgusting.
According to your logic, China need not spend too much on R&D, and struggling how to make the product not absurdly expensive.
If we do like that then we never catch up, we can catch up because we are willing to spend more money. Just an example, how much did SMIC pay Dr. Liang, and how much Samsung paid him?
Money must be spent a lot to catch up.
And Private companies do not want to lose, that is why government must lend its hand to solve the problem.
 
Last edited:

staplez

New Member
Registered Member
According to your logic, China need not spend too much on R&D, and struggling how to make the product not absurdly expensive.
If we do like that then we never catch up, we can catch up because we are willing to spend more money. Just an example, how much did SMIC pay Dr. Liang, and how much Samsung paid him?
Money must be spent a lot to catch up.
What? I don't think you understood what I said. I'm saying China isn't paying money to "catch up" in the sense of being able to make 3nm chips. They already made those. Hell if your talking about non-mass produced stuff China's already made them with EUV. Thus, in the sense of can China make low nm chips, the answer was yes even before the whole trade war. If that's all China was going for, then yes, they could just stop right now.

What China can't do is make reasonably priced, high yield versions of those chips. The problem with this is, just throwing money at the problem doesn't solve a damn thing. All things need to be accounted for. This is why Xi is calling for a whole of society solution.
 

nugroho

Junior Member
What? I don't think you understood what I said. I'm saying China isn't paying money to "catch up" in the sense of being able to make 3nm chips. They already made those. Hell if your talking about non-mass produced stuff China's already made them with EUV. Thus, in the sense of can China make low nm chips, the answer was yes even before the whole trade war. If that's all China was going for, then yes, they could just stop right now.

What China can't do is make reasonably priced, high yield versions of those chips. The problem with this is, just throwing money at the problem doesn't solve a damn thing. All things need to be accounted for. This is why Xi is calling for a whole of society solution.
I think you must reread my post, where in my post did I write about a 3 nm chip ?
It is in your imagination, then you said I wrote that
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top