On the apparently ongoing US/JP/NL negotiations re DUVi
I second what @PopularScience had said, this thread is a treasure trove with a lot of excellent contributors, I can't name all of them But @PopularScience is definitely one of them together with @tokenanalyst (the maestro) , @olalavn , @FairAndUnbiased , @latenlazy, @hvpc , @foofy , @Oldschool , @tinrobert , @superdog and the venerable @WTAN.Then I guess I will stay away from there, sometimes, I almost get convinced there but I guess I should've known better
On the apparently ongoing US/JP/NL negotiations re DUVi
Posting his tweets are fine as long as the contents do not cause toxic discussions.No Paul Triolo in this thread. How many times this rule has to be reiterated?
I think if a Twitter post contains real fact and is from someone with legitimate connection, it's probably fine. Posting Twitter takes or opinions generally don't lead to quality discussions. That should probably be avoided.I think we should refrain from posting from social media in general, Triolo opinion tweets are professional and in some cases interesting, but I fear it could open the floodgates to low quality twitter posting and social media posting in this thread. Pages and pages of social media opinions.
After all, while we are very pro china here, we also try to understand more even if we don't like to hear bad news. Accurate news is good. Social media takes aren't better than what we already do here.