Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
I think we will hear news of layoff at CXMT or YMTC this year before we see them kick into higher gears.

many will laugh at the above, but we can revisit this speculation of mine at the end of this year.

Well,semiconductor industry as a whole is heading into down turn. You saw news about Intel and Micron layoffs,and memory price collapsing. So even if we hear news of layoff at CXMT or YMTC,we would not know whether it's due to the macro-environment or US sanctions
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
?? This does not reflect the state if domestic memory fabs. This is not we are seeing and hearing.

first, the article you referenced is from 2018. Much has changed since then. If you haven’t noticed, the same fear discussed in that article is a big motivator behind US government’s various actions to stymie Chinese memory fabs’ progress.

the situation now is totally different from 2018.

In fact, this is not publicly well known, but there were actually talk of cutting workforce as a result of US’s tightening sanction last October. Domestic memory fabs are starting to feel the impact of American WFE pulling out last October. The negative impact to their production capability and capacity will continue to grow bigger. Replacing American equipments with domestic ones won’t happen over night and won’t happen fast enough. Pushing into higher gear doesn’t seem realistic at the moment. I think we will hear news of layoff at CXMT or YMTC this year before we see them kick into higher gears.

many will laugh at the above, but we can revisit this speculation of mine at the end of this year.
I suspect some processes had to be redesigned, but who knows, let see what happens. I think US companies are going to have some troubles entering the Chinese market again, they way the pull out of the Chinese market even breaking contracts was outstanding to say the least.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
What really makes the Dutch goverment angry is while ASML was denied of selling their biggest cash grab in China for three years, EUVL machines, US companies were getting export licenses for their most expensive equipment at the same time, that is why ASML revenue in China was reduced to 10%, they were not selling their most expensive monopolized tools and top of that it has accelerated the R&D of EUVL in China. And knowing the US, ASML will be allowed to sell Low NA EUV tools basically when the Chinese develop own Low NA EUV tools or maybe not even then.
I think it is good that the Dutch minister spoke out here (after already speaking out in November), because rumors kept swirling from Bloomberg of impending sanctions in January. It's quite clear at this point that certain people were just doing releasing rumors to Bloomberg editors in order to put pressure on Dutch & Japanese gov't officials. At this point, I still think it's more likely than not that some form of sanctions will happen later this year, but at least they have a few more months. And depending on how things get worded in implementation, they might have some grace period on top of that. Which will give them enough time to qualify their domestic lines and lithography machines.

All the major foundries are cutting back capex this year vs original 2022 projection while ASML has been increasing production. From what I can see, the one that's most affected here is SMIC. They just have to stock up as much of the foreign stuff as possible. Any non-American sanction will just stop future sales. They are not going to stop after service support. Have SMIC's local gov't JV partner foot the bills for as many needed tools as can be delivered and then you are shielded for a couple of years. They really don't need that much time.

The Huawei whisperer stated in that infamous 12/14 nm weibo post that 7nm chip (which I would assume is referring to SMIC N+2 process, or somewhere between TSMC N7P and Samsung 5nm) will be ready in 2025. That tells me N+2 production for SMIC is likely to be fully up and running by middle of 2024 (not just some trial production). To get there, they need a lot more tools for their SN2 factory.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think it is good that the Dutch minister spoke out here (after already speaking out in November), because rumors kept swirling from Bloomberg of impending sanctions in January. It's quite clear at this point that certain people were just doing releasing rumors to Bloomberg editors in order to put pressure on Dutch & Japanese gov't officials. At this point, I still think it's more likely than not that some form of sanctions will happen later this year, but at least they have a few more months. And depending on how things get worded in implementation, they might have some grace period on top of that. Which will give them enough time to qualify their domestic lines and lithography machines.
If can guess what is happening is:
- The US want a ban in the entire ASML immersion line.
- The Dutch probably are offering NXT2050i and the NXT2000i at worst.
-The US want ASML to stop servicing immersion machines in China.
-The Dutch just said, nee, "that is excessive".
-The US wants the Netherlands and Europe in general to adopt the same US person rule that they adopted.
-The Dutch just said, NEE, "that is even more excessive".
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
I suspect some processes had to be redesigned, but who knows, let see what happens. I think US companies are going to have some troubles entering the Chinese market again, they way the pull out of the Chinese market even breaking contracts was outstanding to say the least.
I think YMTC will be shielded more, because 3D NAND is more forgiving on lateral dimensions and you can relax the lateral dimensions somewhat in exchange for higher layer count.

A ~45 nm cell CD, while not ideal, is achievable with lower end immersion tools or multipatterning dry ArF, and has been used for earlier Samsung 3D NAND processes. If YMTC has to go back to that, it might be a setback, but in the context of all foreign tools and chips being banned from the Chinese market, something like a 300+ layer, 40 nm CD chip would be a good transition product while lithography catches up.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
I think YMTC will be shielded more, because 3D NAND is more forgiving on lateral dimensions and you can relax the lateral dimensions somewhat in exchange for higher layer count.

A ~45 nm cell CD, while not ideal, is achievable with lower end immersion tools or multipatterning dry ArF, and has been used for earlier Samsung 3D NAND processes. If YMTC has to go back to that, it might be a setback, but in the context of all foreign tools and chips being banned from the Chinese market, something like a 300+ layer, 40 nm CD chip would be a good transition product while lithography catches up.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
They did use KLA tools for the metrology, they will have to work with current and coming Chinese metrology companies. In terms of etching 3DNAND has very high aspect ratio requirements, I don't know if they used LAM etching tools or AMEC tools, they don't mention in the literature, either way now they will have to work with Naura or AMEC..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
They did use KLA tools for the metrology, they will have to work with current and coming Chinese metrology companies. In terms of etching 3DNAND has very high aspect ratio requirements, I don't know if they used LAM etching tools or AMEC tools, they don't mention in the literature, either way now they will have to work with Naura or AMEC..

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Metrology is the big one, but 3D NAND metrology is GI-SAXS which is part of the X-ray metrology complex that China already has.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

In particular, SAXS is a technology highly related to XRD, which means that once XRD instruments are created, SAXS is just a matter of improving the source and getting the correct interpretation software.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Reclaimer

Junior Member
Registered Member
What really makes the Dutch goverment angry is while ASML was denied of selling their biggest cash grab in China for three years, EUVL machines, US companies were getting export licenses for their most expensive equipment at the same time, that is why ASML revenue in China was reduced to 10%, they were not selling their most expensive monopolized tools and top of that it has accelerated the R&D of EUVL in China. And knowing the US, ASML will be allowed to sell Low NA EUV tools basically when the Chinese develop own Low NA EUV tools or maybe not even then.
I hope the Dutch (and other countries) realize that the US war on the semiconductor industry has put anyone with a monopoly/quasi-monopoly in the supply chain at risk. Even though there was incentive to be less dependent on foreign suppliers in the early 2010s, it is nothing compared to the hundreds of billions invested into building a brand new supply chain free of American influence.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
China accounting for a majority of production in an industry doesn't prevent the US from sanctioning China; if anything, it encourages the US to play on the fear of Chinese monopoly, which leads to even more sanctions. The reason is the same, ironically, on both sides - it's to force the domestic industry to diversify their supply lines and dependencies. Politics dictate economics and always have.

Also, to bargain, you have to have the right leverage. The problem with China's bargaining power vis-a-vis the West is that the West historically owned the high technology, while China just owned the labor and infrastructure. The latter cannot function without the former, but the former can function without the latter, since the West can take their technology to, say, India or Vietnam or Indonesia, and manufacture there.

This isn't to say those countries can fully replace China, but rather that scarcity is a natural law. If what you own is scarce (and high technologies like EUV are scarce), then you have more leverage. By contrast, if what you own is abundant (and labor & infrastructure are abundant), then you have less leverage. If China was the only major source of labor and infrastructure in the world, the West wouldn't dare to sanction China; but because of the pyramid effect in which there are much more competitors at China's level, than at the West's, the West believes it has the bargaining advantage and thus, the "right" to sanction China.

In other words, they are trying to show China how "abundant" labor and infrastructure is - by forcing it out of China and in doing so, reducing China's leverage.

The proper response is to show the West that their own "scarce resource" isn't nearly as scarce as they think - by developing alternatives to Western technology that, essentially, reduces the scarcity of high technology and thus Western leverage.
None sense. Infrastructure and skilled labor are a rare combination and only China offer competitive one. Example includes EV. Otherwise US can make Tesla move to Africa where labor are cheaper. Chinese industrial infrastructure is the best in the world even ahead of developed country. This is a irreplaceble advantage not easily overcome with money(see the American trillion dollar infrastructure plan). The cheap labor was never about some cheap slave labor but about skilled labor like electricians. There is no shortage of country with cheaper labor for the past 2 decades but thanks to unique advantage of strong education China offer these skilled labor at low cost.


So in the end it comes down to education and extensive infrastructure. Both of which requires decades of planning to achieve and very few could do it anyways. The few that does invariably are developed country with exception of China, and China is ahead of these so called 'developed country' anyways in these area. So no, China advantage cannot be replaced and is unique.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top