I'm sorry to put it this bluntly but that's just some cope. No matter how intricate and well-made a tricycle is, it's not going to be a motorbike. China needs to get the proper processes in place to manufacture <= 28nm chips at scale. Dry DUV belongs in a museum of technology, not the centerpiece of China's tools manufacturers.A dual stage dry ArF system can be used with double patterning to produce 45 nm, and in fact Intel introduced double patterning dry ArF for their 45 nm process, only moving to immersion in their 32 nm products. I imagine with aggressive multipatterning, dry ArF would be sufficient for 28 nm with lower yields, though this is just a guess.
I'm sure it's a very fancy tricycle.The other thing is, modern 45/65 nm isn't just about die shrinks. Since that time there were many new materials and processes introduced, like high-k gate dielectric (instead of gate oxide), metal gate (instead of Si gate), ppb grade materials, full molecular contaminant control, etc. So you can get way better performance with modern 45/65 nm than you can with old school 45/65 nm at the same cost.
What a sorry state of affairs. It needs to change by supplying SMIC with advanced tools asap, not entrenched by giving it better antiques.For TSMC, useless, because it targets the 40-90 nm market, which makes up 15% market share. For SMIC, extremely necessary, because these segments make up 60% of their market.
Use the right tool for the job, not an excessive tool, not an insufficient tool. Dry ArF is much cheaper than immersion ArF and not all processes or layers require immersion ArF. It is the most efficient known tool for processes at 45-90 nm node which is the most cost effective node for a wide variety of products.Very disappointing to hear that the SSA 800 will go into mass production in June at the earliest. I had expected that to be in early Q1, now we're looking at late Q2 if not later. SMEE really needs to get its shit together.
I'm sorry to put it this bluntly but that's just some cope. No matter how intricate and well-made a tricycle is, it's not going to be a motorbike. China needs to get the proper processes in place to manufacture <= 28nm chips at scale. Dry DUV belongs in a museum of technology, not the centerpiece of China's tools manufacturers.
I'm sure it's a very fancy tricycle.
What a sorry state of affairs. It needs to change by supplying SMIC with advanced tools asap, not entrenched by giving it better antiques.
That's nice for them, but 45-90nm is not the bottleneck China's facing. If Chinese fabs didn't have ASML's trash to tide them over until SMEE was ready, this situation would be truly dire. To put it like that American prick did, I don't care about the chips that go into airbags.Texas Instruments, Infineon, etc makes a shit ton of money while mostly buying depreciated old tools and "coping" with "tricycles".
It is what it is. In terms of publicly known capability, 45-90 nm is still beyond commercially available domestic lithography, and Huawei itself planned to start with a 45 nm fab. So a dual stage dry ArF would be a stepping stone to start customers working with the dual stage workflow and giving feedback, while getting the immersion systems separately set up. The only reason I can imagine for them not selling this sort of system is either the extreme challenge of the dual stage or the extreme criticality of the dual stage.That's nice for them, but 45-90nm is not the bottleneck China's facing. If Chinese fabs didn't have ASML's trash to tide them over until SMEE was ready, this situation would be truly dire. To put it like that American prick did, I don't care about the chips that go into airbags.
SMIC is not meant to play in the same little sandbox TI and Infineon play in, it's meant to be China's premier fab on its way to being the world's most dominant. 2 year delays on a technology like DUVi is unacceptable.
bro you are right about SMEE's DUVi being late 2 years but it is what it is. Q2 is also not too far.That's nice for them, but 45-90nm is not the bottleneck China's facing. If Chinese fabs didn't have ASML's trash to tide them over until SMEE was ready, this situation would be truly dire. To put it like that American prick did, I don't care about the chips that go into airbags.
SMIC is not meant to play in the same little sandbox TI and Infineon play in, it's meant to be China's premier fab on its way to being the world's most dominant. 2 year delays on a technology like DUVi is unacceptable.
Tomorrow i post.Well, since I'm cheerleading (from outside the stadium, no less) and the only thing getting mad about this will change is my blood pressure, I'll end by hoping the lithography crew I'm cheering for is more like the Chinese weightlifting team than the Chinese football team.
@PopularScience, if you can, would you please post what havok wrote and the context around it? Did he mention EUV?
45nm is more useful than you would think. eFlash is basically stuck around 45nm right now.That's nice for them, but 45-90nm is not the bottleneck China's facing. If Chinese fabs didn't have ASML's trash to tide them over until SMEE was ready, this situation would be truly dire. To put it like that American prick did, I don't care about the chips that go into airbags.
SMIC is not meant to play in the same little sandbox TI and Infineon play in, it's meant to be China's premier fab on its way to being the world's most dominant. 2 year delays on a technology like DUVi is unacceptable.
What was the original expected timeline for them? It would be weird for me if dry machine is not already in mass production, since it was announced in that article about Shanghai's ic sector achievements. And we have seen them winning bids for it.A good analogy is c919. After certified by authority, the plane need to be tested by airline.
Anyway, havok mentioned dry machine was late by 3 years, and immersion one was late by 2 years
That's fine. I think there is a lot of value when they can get production ramped up for dry arf machines for local needs. I have also been pretty clear that I think it will take some time for them to ramp up production on arf immersion scanner. That's why they still need to buy and stock up large number of asml scanners. but it would be disappointing if they have not produced a small number of ssa800 for fabs to test with and debug the system. I am operating under the assumption that several Chinese fabs do have ssa800 for testing out process.65 nm capable dual stage dry ArF like the ASML TwinScan XT1040K would be sufficient for almost all analog, MCU, power, RF, display driver, etc component that China would ever need. The big challenge for immersion is the entire ecosystem around it has to change, since now you not only need ArF resist, but you need a nonreactive nonleaching hydrophobic resist or alternatively a DUV transparent nonleaching nonreactive hydrophobic topcoat that does not dissolve into the resist (not even a little). This adds significant RD burden.
A dual stage dry ArF system can be used with double patterning to produce 45 nm, and in fact Intel introduced double patterning dry ArF for their 45 nm process, only moving to immersion in their 32 nm products. I imagine with aggressive multipatterning, dry ArF would be sufficient for 28 nm with lower yields, though this is just a guess.
The other thing is, modern 45/65 nm isn't just about die shrinks. Since that time there were many new materials and processes introduced, like high-k gate dielectric (instead of gate oxide), metal gate (instead of Si gate), ppb grade materials, full molecular contaminant control, etc. So you can get way better performance with modern 45/65 nm than you can with old school 45/65 nm at the same cost.
Sure, given their other struggles, I would say they are not the obvious choice here for euv. These are all large scale collaboration effort. All the advancement in duvi production is not going to help them much in advanced process if they don't have euvs in 5 years.Tomorrow i post.
SMEE working on DUV only. EUV is responsible of another institute.
I think he meant that the dry DUV had been delayed by three years but it's in production now, i.e., even though it's being mass produced and delivered to customers, that was expected to happen three years prior.What was the original expected timeline for them? It would be weird for me if dry machine is not already in mass production, since it was announced in that article about Shanghai's ic sector achievements. And we have seen them winning bids for it.
We've had indications that that's been happening since at least 2021. What I think is going on here is that since SMIC has a secure supply of DUVi tools sufficient for its near/medium term expansion plans (a stockpile it's in physical possession of and an assurance that the Dutch government will stiff-arm the US long enough to deliver the remaining order), it wants the SSA800 to perform to a higher standard than SMEE has been able to deliver.but it would be disappointing if they have not produced a small number of ssa800 for fabs to test with and debug the system. I am operating under the assumption that several Chinese fabs do have ssa800 for testing out process.
I've always thought SMEE was the weak link but I might have been unfair to it, given that it's had to compete against much more capable foreign alternatives China has access to and it's very poorly resourced. Having said that, I would like to see SMEE get bought out by a company like Huawei to consolidate the parts integration effort.Sure, given their other struggles, I would say they are not the obvious choice here for euv. These are all large scale collaboration effort. All the advancement in duvi production is not going to help them much in advanced process if they don't have euvs in 5 years.