China is making progress on both DUV and EUV lithography. Specifically, Chinese researchers already solved the EUV's light source (the main technical bottleneck).
I can't believe two very important tools in traditional IC induatry that China has no domestic suppliers. Those two tools also needed for EUV. One is EBL electron beam lithography that used to make traditional chrome on glass design mask and which is also used for EUV mask. The second is...
www.sinodefenceforum.com
Interesting, so if the Changchun Institute of Optics rolls out its EUV lithographic prototype in 2022, we should see the first commercial delivery in around 2025?
www.sinodefenceforum.com
America is run by its wealthy dynasties. Above all, they care about money and power/control
for themselves only. They don't care about its citizens at all. All of them are expendable. They only care that Americans are pacified enough to go with their program. So, if you wish to hurt America's controllers, hurt their pocketbooks and weaken their power/control.
As for retaliation against American cheating and sabotage to distort the free market against superior competitors, China should consider issuing a blacklist of unreliable suppliers that bans all products that involve any American components. In other words, the ban applies to any and all products/services (not just of American origin) that contains American parts. This may evolve to include American-allied suppliers too if merited.
The justification writes itself. America is an unreliable cheat with a mercurial temper that weaponizes its businesses to kill competitors. These actions attack the very spirit of a free market. America has attempted to kill numerous legitimate Chinese businesses, used food and medical sanctions to commit mass murder against anti-imperialist nations (eg Iran), etc. American suppliers represent an existential risk to our supply chain and banning American components is just risk mitigation that any responsible company must do. This black list combined with the irresistibly large Chinese market will make it hard for non-American companies to refuse - especially when many components probably have Chinese substitutes.
The blacklist can easily be expanded with other justifications - IT products banned due to NSA industrial espionage, entertainment banned due to racism/propaganda/psychological warfare (eg Hurt Locker movie, Call of Duty video game), agriculture banned due to health dangers (eg glyphosate), misc banned due to ties to US military or fraud, etc. The blacklist could even be made public into a global list to expose America's dirty tricks and dangerous products, which will further reduce their profits and control.
On a separate note....
China should poach as much talent as possible during the coronavirus crisis as people are laid off and turn desperate. Attention should be focused on removing the technical lynchpins of American corporations. While preferable, It does not matter if these lynchpins are useful to China.
Warnings should also be issued against Chinese studying in hostile Western nations. Recruitment of overseas talent should ramp up. Anti Chinese crimes should be publicized to assist these efforts.
China needs to prevent America from stealing TSMC's technology/ip. By 2023, Chinese semiconductor FABs will be very competitive to TSMC. Their fate is sealed so offer them a lifeline ", join us and we prosper together. Join them and we'll ensure your investments are in vain." See the blacklist above.
As America gets more desperate, it will resort to military force. Frustrate their efforts. For example, sell anti stealth radars to targets of American imperialism eg Venezuela used a Chinese anti stealth radar to expose a f22 recently. Use these humiliations to hurt American prestige, sales, and influence while increasing China's
As the largest trading nation in the world that makes practically everything people want and need to buy, China should consider accepting only RMB for Chinese goods. Buyers can pay USD but it'll cost them 20-30% more.
As for banning medical exports it depends on the math. Manqiangrexue is correct. It looks really bad. On the other hand, this would create more economic damage, which leads to political unrest, which leads to investments leaving - a self reinforcing death spiral. It's a geopolitically useful option worth exploring, but it would require a delicate PR campaign if enacted. China would have to create a justification that would be accepted in the court of public opinion.