Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
Agree. in the ideal world everyone would specialize in what their do best, some countries in capital equipment, some companies in IP and others in manufacturing. in the case of Huawei should be only communications, now they are regretting not getting into semiconductor manufacturing sooner, now they have to made it from the ground up with local tools. In a perfect world Huawei shouldn't have to make thier own foundries but now is a life or death situation.
I disagree profoundly with this. The doctrine of comparative advantage (what you're describing here) might seem like a benign economic truism (England makes the cotton, Portugal the wine, etc.) but not all economic activity is equal. Specializing in technological innovation and industry allows you to ensnare your competitors into a dependent relationship that entrenches your advantages at their expense. I wrote about this in much more detail
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Specifically, these two paragraphs:
Consider two countries A and B. Country A has an advanced industrial and technologically innovative economy, while country B has a backward, agrarian and labour-intensive economy. Orthodox economic doctrines teach us that country A should export to B what it needs in technology, while B should export textiles, raw materials, and other goods of this sort to A. The conventional analysis usually ends there, but we shall look deeper. What is country A spending its income on? Unfailingly, on improving its technology. B? Without question, a healthy chunk of it is siphoned by a corrupt elite more interested in the luxuries A produces than in the well-being of their fellow citizens, but the truth is that the vast majority of it is spent doing what B does best: extracting more raw materials and making more low-value goods for consumption by A. None of it is spent developing B’s technology because B has no technology of its own to develop. With every transaction, A’s technological lead grows wider and wider fuelled by B’s wealth. This is the secret of the middle-income trap: one falls into it by making the “rational” economic decisions!

Whether by accident or design, the West – specifically the Anglo-American cohort – has fashioned a remarkable ideological bludgeon in the doctrine of “comparative advantage”. Even the theory’s canonical example: British cotton (actually, cotton produced by African slaves and Indian coolies) and Portuguese wine serves also as its perfect refutation. Cotton lies on the path to industrialization, wine does not – which is why you’re reading this in English, not Portuguese.
American sanctions have forced China to create its own semiconductor ecosystem, something it didn't do and would never have done in other circumstances no matter how many Made in China 2025 plans the government issued.
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
MCU is not the only automotive chip. Why are you trying to mislead again?

Am I?Looks like I need to highlight the sentence,since you didn't bother to read

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

上述这三点问题,如果只是做消费级产品,其实可以随着时间慢慢改善。但是如果做车规产品,就涉及到量产后的一致性、稳定性等问题。据老王介绍,尽管消费级的成熟工艺国内已经可以做了。但车规级的成熟工艺,国内代工厂能做的并不多,大部分流片还是要去找台湾或国外厂商。“我们的工艺其实是确实的,全球能做汽车工艺的晶圆厂其实没几家,都不是大陆的。”老王也表示,虽然类似于国内的中芯国际也在联系他们来做免费的车规产品试产,但试产和量产是两个概念。
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
did not contradict me. it is still only talking about MCU.

You said I was misleading

I said “there is a lack of foundries that can make auto-grade chips in China”,which is exactly what the sentence I highlighted says. I didn't twist anything from the original meaning. So where is the misleading?
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
I said “there is a lack of foundries that can make auto-grade chips in China”,which is exactly what the sentence I highlighted says. I didn't twist anything from the original meaning. So where is the misleading?
Hua Hong can do them. I would be surprised if SMIC could not do them as well. Those are two largest foundries in China. How come STMicro, a much smaller company, manages to produce these chips just fine then?

I mean just look at these pages.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I do not know exactly what these automotive guys need. Still, that 8-bit MCU from BYD had eFlash in it. SMIC has eFlash in their 180nm process. And Hua Hong - Shanghai Huali has eFlash in their 55nm process. I doubt that 8-bit MCU uses a process better than 180nm. Heck the 180nm is probably good enough for 32-bit MCUs.

The article talks about the lack of automotive IDMs in China and is dismayed that most are fabless. But I actually think that is an advantage instead of being a bad thing.

The article also claims there are no Chinese RISC-V MCUs. Ever heard of the GigaDevice GD32V?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

sndef888

Captain
Registered Member
I disagree profoundly with this. The doctrine of comparative advantage (what you're describing here) might seem like a benign economic truism (England makes the cotton, Portugal the wine, etc.) but not all economic activity is equal. Specializing in technological innovation and industry allows you to ensnare your competitors into a dependent relationship that entrenches your advantages at their expense. I wrote about this in much more detail
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Specifically, these two paragraphs:

American sanctions have forced China to create its own semiconductor ecosystem, something it didn't do and would never have done in other circumstances no matter how many Made in China 2025 plans the government issued.
Comparative advantage is a highly exaggerated economic concept propagated by the west to maintain the current economic system, aka we take the cosy high-tech jobs while the rest of the world provides cheap factory labour and food
 

european_guy

Junior Member
Registered Member
Ansy, the chart that Alb posted show that N+2 (SMIC's version of 7nm) is superior to any TSMC/Samsung 7nm variant and is comparable to Samsung 5nm technology. It also shows that N+2 Improved is equivalent to Samsung 4nm or TSMC 5nm technology. N+3 would be TSMC 3nm technology. There, all SMIC needs to do is get to N+2 improved. It has a good chance to get there in 2 years.

I just highlight the most important part from this article. Mostly, it was just rehashing of the earnings call and transcript, but with a couple of important part.

Here is the important part. Retaining talent, training talent and keep up with expansion plant during the worst part of the demand cycle. That's what makes great companies. Or at least in this case, one with a lot of resources.


Here is the more important part. SMIC is fully capable of not only mass producing 7nm and 5nm technology.


I think there is a good possibility that some of the Beijing/Shenzhen production lines will be using all domestic equipment, but other ones will still be using foreign equipment like ASML.

I have often wondered how much advanced node production they can actually do, because SN1/SN2 were originally only designed for 70k wpm when fully completed. As in the case with many Chinese fabs, the eventual capacity often grow past the originally designed capacity as more money and space become available. It's also possible that Lingang will do more of the 22/28 production since it's capex for equipment is about 25% higher than Beijing/Tianjin plant. Regardless, I think it's a fair assumption that Lingang is more likely to see foreign equipments.

Which brings us back to the original question of how much they can expand SMSC's SN1/SN2 fabs. They have gone completely radio silent in order to avoid further sanctions. we know that they intentionally kept FinFet away from other fabs, so that possible Western sanctions of ASML/Japanese tool makers do not affect any of their other projects (since US gov't is trying to keep any 14nm tools away). As such, any sanctions that ASML/Japanese may agree to (based on FT article) would only affect the SMSC fab among SMIC fabs.

We know that their increased capex of $1.6 billion are prepayment for ASML machines (or at least most of it). Since ASML is doubling their capacity while other chipmakers are cutting back on their capex, the idea that they need to put in money right now to reserve spots for 18 months from now does not pass the smell test. More importantly, $1.6 billion would give you 25 to 30 Arfi scanners. For prepayments, $1.6 billion is probably enough for like 50 arfi scanners. They are likely to add 150k wpm of 12-inch capacity over the next 3 years between Beijing/Shenzhen/Lingang. You do not need 50 arfi scanners for 150k wpm of mostly 28 nm and more mature process. If 50k wpm of 28nm node requires 10, then 150k wpm of 28 nm to 180 nm likely would only require 15 to 20. And we know some of those front end scanners will be SMEE machines.

Which tells me that the $1.6 billion additional capex is mostly for SMSC fab and possibly Lingang fab (although that one won't start production until 2023 I think?) It makes the most sense for them to buy up as many of the latest ASML Arfi scanners now, because they might not be available a year from now. On top of that, slots just opened up as other fabs reduced their capex. Let's say that $1.4 out of $1.6 are used for fast tracking ASML deliveries in 2023 and 2024 (if they are lucky) and they normally would spend about $1.5 billion a year from ASML, this would double their deliveries and possibly even more if they keep up their increased capex spending. $3.0 billion over the next year from ASML could mean 35 Arfi scanners (at $70 million each since they will buy a mix of 1980i and the more expensive 2100i) and 40 to 50 other front end scanners. That is on top of probably 15 or more arfi scanners they are taking in this year that are likely to mostly into SN2 fab. Assuming that the machines for SN1 production have mostly already been purchased in previous years for finishing to ramp up SN1 production this year. 15 + 35 = 50. Let's say 15 out of 50 will be set aside from SN1, Beijing and Lingang plants in 2023 to 2025.

The remaining 35 ends up with SN2 and other future SMSC expansion. Based on figures provided by tinrobert before of 20 Arfi scanners per 50k wpm at 7nm, 35 of these could allow for more than 75k wpm. What I'm saying is that they are spending enough money to probably have 100k wpm of SMSC capacity eventually (more than the 70k that was announced at the start of the project). The yield on N+2 probably won't be too great without EUVs, but China really doesn't have other alternatives right now. Out of that 100k, you can have
25k of 14 nm
25k of N+1
50k of N+2
It would be interesting to hear the capex number from SMIC next year. If they can continue to spend $6 to 7 billion on capex, then they could go even further than this. Maybe Lingang plant will get 14nm nodes production lines also. What do you think @tokenanalyst and @european_guy ? imo, pretty big move by SMIC here.

I agree SMIC is spending heavily on ASML. But I also think what we see is an artifact of the shrinking their budget time-span. Maybe is not new budget, just allocated sooner and compressed in time.

They are placing down-payments now for stuff that in normal times they would have bought much later.

ASML is going to increase production while many of their customers are instead reducing capex, so in theory there would be no need to anticipate so much by SMIC.

But of course there is an elephant in the room here: ASML availability is not a given, so SMIC is placing down payments now with the hope (or maybe they have been hinted!), that even a possible ban would be not so savage like for US equipment, and possibly it would be enforced only on new orders. It is easy to foresee that for ASML this means a lot and represents a key negotiation point with the Americans: for ASML a big part of their credibility in the Chinese market and their future there depends on how the ban is implemented. If it is somehow "professional", or instead turns out to be pure craziness, US style.

Regarding the numbers, I agree SMIC aims to increase capacity in sub 28nm advanced nodes. Considering the huge capital involved (with big support by local government) and considering that from a pure business point of view, for SMIC would make sense instead to focus mainly on 28nm and above, where investment is cheaper, market is very big, and many problems are much much smaller, my personal opinion is that there was some hint or push for SMIC to go sub 28nm, mainly becasue it is strategically important for China eocsystem to have a player there, this is an aim that goes well beyond SMIC own balancesheet and company management considerations.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
I agree SMIC is spending heavily on ASML. But I also think what we see is an artifact of the shrinking their budget time-span. Maybe is not new budget, just allocated sooner and compressed in time.

They are placing down-payments now for stuff that in normal times they would have bought much later.

ASML is going to increase production while many of their customers are instead reducing capex, so in theory there would be no need to anticipate so much by SMIC.

But of course there is an elephant in the room here: ASML availability is not a given, so SMIC is placing down payments now with the hope (or maybe they have been hinted!), that even a possible ban would be not so savage like for US equipment, and possibly it would be enforced only on new orders. It is easy to foresee that for ASML this means a lot and represents a key negotiation point with the Americans: for ASML a big part of their credibility in the Chinese market and their future there depends on how the ban is implemented. If it is somehow "professional", or instead turns out to be pure craziness, US style.

Regarding the numbers, I agree SMIC aims to increase capacity in sub 28nm advanced nodes. Considering the huge capital involved (with big support by local government) and considering that from a pure business point of view, for SMIC would make sense instead to focus mainly on 28nm and above, where investment is cheaper, market is very big, and many problems are much much smaller, my personal opinion is that there was some hint or push for SMIC to go sub 28nm, mainly becasue it is strategically important for China eocsystem to have a player there, this is an aim that goes well beyond SMIC own balancesheet and company management considerations.
Bro I think Shanghai will lead the way for advance node development and production, 14nm, 12nm, 10nm , 7nm and even 5nm, so the concentration of ASML NXT 2050i and even the NXT 2100i. While I think SMIC Beijing will be the second FAB that will have a domesticated 14nm line when finished, the first one is between Huawei JV with ICRD also in Shanghai. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top