Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

xypher

Senior Member
Registered Member
On EDA, The one to watch in 2023, and 2025

"The company listed three development goals in its prospectus: help China “plug holes” in key EDA software categories by 2023, “fully substitute” foreign design tools with domestic versions and create a complete ecosystem of software tools needed for chip design by 2025, and become a global leader in EDA software by 2030.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Empyrean is already one of Samsung's EDA partners -
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. I think they are the real deal.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
Has/Can the Chinese state not establish pilot facilities to test and demonstrate their effectiveness at the cost to the state, given that there is so an urgency to replace foreign lithographic machines and a very realistic probability that even present ArF machines of any foreign country at any nodes will in the near term future be banned from being sold to China? The United States could successively persuade the Dutch and Japanese governments to ban ASML, Nikon, Canon, or any others that exist in the field from selling ANY DUV machines to China.

The Chinese state has so often declared the need for comprehensive technological self reliance. Chinese companies that use advanced technologies will very likely be much more willing to comply with such a proclamation if the development and demonstration of the effective of the domestically made technologies is done at no cost to them.

If you want me to use a particular type of knife and scissors instead of others that I currently use, if you demonstrate that the knife and scissors that you want me to make is as good as they ones that you do not want me to use, and will at least be just as costly, I will most likely buy them, especially if the ones that supply me with the knife and scissors that I like and want to buy either stop supplying me or keep saying that they will stop supplying me.

Let the Chinese government build a comprehensive pilot plant to demonstrate the effectiveness of SMEE's lithography machines and if they prove good enough, SMIC, Yangtze, and others will probably buy them...
The Chinese government should not bear all the responsibilities and the associated costs for tools' development. The private players have responsibilities to pay most of the R & D costs since it is their corporate asses on the line and they are the ones who will profit from the tools.
 
Last edited:

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
The Chinese government should not bear all the responsibilities and the associated costs for tool’s development. The private players have responsibilities to pay most of the R & D costs too since it is their corporate asses on the line and they are the ones who will profit from the tools.
This are basically moonshot projects and the market doesn't like moonshot projects. If the goverment or outside investors don't absorb at least a good part of the cost of the research and development of this tools, companies may not even want to try take the risk or would take decades, the entirety of the China semiconductor industry may die and therefore the electronic industry and IT industry if a crazy enough US administration comes into power. We are talking a good percentage of China GDP may be a risk if the U.S. Hawks exacerbate their war against China technology sector.
The Chinese goverment and the Chinese public in general should treat this for what it is. War. And respond at such. Companies, engineers, researchers and research institutions are the soldiers.
Take SMEE for example, there is no way a company like SMEE would touch a project like the immersion lithography project without substantial goverment support, for SMEE alone is simple way more profitable to develop and sell very low end lithography machines and inspection tools than even dreaming of trying to compete against ASML. Is just impossible for them to do it alone.

If the Chinese goverment leave this to market to solve alone, it could be a huge and costly mistake. Even if "corporate asses" profit from the war-like effort, the benefits for China may very well worth it, if that means a secured semiconductor-electronics supply chain.
 

vincent

Grumpy Old Man
Staff member
Moderator - World Affairs
This are basically moonshot projects and the market doesn't like moonshot projects. If the goverment or outside investors don't absorb at least a good part of the cost of the research and development of this tools, companies may not even want to try take the risk or would take decades, the entirety of the China semiconductor industry may die and therefore the electronic industry and IT industry if a crazy enough US administration comes into power. We are talking a good percentage of China GDP may be a risk if the U.S. Hawks exacerbate their war against China technology sector.
The Chinese goverment and the Chinese public in general should treat this for what it is. War. And respond at such. Companies, engineers, researchers and research institutions are the soldiers.
Take SMEE for example, there is no way a company like SMEE would touch a project like the immersion lithography project without substantial goverment support, for SMEE alone is simple way more profitable to develop and sell very low end lithography machines and inspection tools than even dreaming of trying to compete against ASML. Is just impossible for them to do it alone.

If the Chinese goverment leave this to market to solve alone, it could be a huge and costly mistake. Even if "corporate asses" profit from the war-like effort, the benefits for China may very well worth it, if that means a secured semiconductor-electronics supply chain.

Well, Chinese government has been screaming "build dependable suppliers" ever since Xi Jinping became the president and most of the R & D money were provided by the government, the equipment developed before the trade war went nowhere because no one bother to use them. The reason is absorbing new and untested equipment cost time, money and efforts. In a normal environment no sane managers will want to adopt new and most likely inferior equipment. Without the market adoption, new domestic equipment makers can't improve nor expand. The industry has to change its attitude and help out as well. The government can provide cheap/no interest loans to the corporations and set some covenants to prevent abuses.
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
Well, Chinese government has been screaming "build dependable suppliers" ever since Xi Jinping became the president and most of the R & D money were provided by the government, the equipment developed before the trade war went nowhere because no one bother to use them. The reason is absorbing new and untested equipment cost time, money and efforts. In a normal environment no sane managers will want to adopt new and most likely inferior equipment. Without the market adoption, new domestic equipment makers can't improve nor expand. The industry has to change its attitude and help out as well. The government can provide cheap/no interest loans to the corporations and set some covenants to prevent abuses.
I agree, these US companies should never have been allowed to monopolize the Chinese market, knowing the risk that export controls represented, too much trust was given to these companies and too much decision-making power was given to foreign managers in the direction of the industry, but also the government was blind to the idea of making chips no matter how.

A smaller industry but more localized and secured against outside interference from these lunatics. An industry that will not only grow horizontally but also vertically where all sectors grow in unison rather than having few sectors growing but dependent of untrusted tools and other sectors stagnated. The localization of the industry rather just making a lot of chips with borrowed tools, It would have been a better goal.
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
So the Japanese equipment manufacture made it clear,they will NOT take advantage of the current situation try to gain Chinese market and fill the vacuum left by US peers

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

TEL预计本财年下半年半导体制造设备的销售将急剧下降,美国对向中国出口先进芯片和相关生产设备的新规将加深和延长这种低迷。

TEL是日本最大的电子和半导体私营公司之一,已将截至 2023 年 3 月的六个月的销售预期下调了 25% 以上,这提醒那些关注半导体行业的人,该行业仍然是高度周期性的。

Toshiki Kawai 总裁对分析师和媒体表示,预计销售额减少的大约一半(估计为 2500 亿日元(18 亿美元))是由于美国制裁对中国半导体行业的影响,该公司早些时候就指出了这一风险。

Kawai 还表示,TEL不会利用制裁在中国赢得新订单,以牺牲受美国商务部出口限制的美国竞争对手为代价。这些竞争对手包括 Applied Materials 和 Lam Research,这两家公司都表示制裁将对他们的业务产生重大负面影响。

TEL expects sales of semiconductor manufacturing equipment to drop sharply in the second half of the fiscal year, and new U.S. rules on exports of advanced chips and related production equipment to China will deepen and prolong the slump.

TEL, one of Japan's largest privately held electronics and semiconductor companies, has cut its sales forecast for the six months to March 2023 by more than 25%, reminding those following the semiconductor industry, which remains highly cyclical .

About half of the expected decline in sales, estimated at 250 billion yen ($1.8 billion), is due to the impact of U.S. sanctions on China's semiconductor industry, President Toshiki Kawai told analysts and the media, which the company earlier noted. a risk.

Kawai also said TEL would not use sanctions to win new orders in China at the expense of U.S. competitors that are subject to export restrictions by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Those competitors include Applied Materials and Lam Research, both of which said the sanctions would have a significant negative impact on their businesses.
 

tonyget

Senior Member
Registered Member
I agree, these US companies should never have been allowed to monopolize the Chinese market, knowing the risk that export controls represented, too much trust was given to these companies and too much decision-making power was given to foreign managers in the direction of the industry, but also the government was blind to the idea of making chips no matter how.

A smaller industry but more localized and secured against outside interference from these lunatics. An industry that will not only grow horizontally but also vertically where all sectors grow in unison rather than having few sectors growing but dependent of untrusted tools and other sectors stagnated. The localization of the industry rather just making a lot of chips with borrowed tools, It would have been a better goal.

Chinese government eliminated import tariff on foreign semi-equipment,as part of incentive measure to boost domestic semiconductor production,since last year. That tells you about government‘s perception on foreign equipment.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
So the Japanese equipment manufacture made it clear,they will NOT take advantage of the current situation try to gain Chinese market and fill the vacuum left by US peers

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Well they have to say that to escape scrutiny from a so called reliable friend....lol. It's a standard business double talk cause I assure you everybody like the smell of money especially the Red One within the Red Pocket. ;)
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
So the Japanese equipment manufacture made it clear,they will NOT take advantage of the current situation try to gain Chinese market and fill the vacuum left by US peers

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
You say it best, they will TRY.

They will TRY not to take advantage of the situation. They will TRY not to take the market shared of American companies. They will TRY to reject billions on sales because they care about the well being of their American competitors.

There is not guaranteed that they will succeed it but hell if they will TRY.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top