IDK much about military lasers or ASML lasers in particular, but from my understanding ASML uses a CO2 laser which is somewhat absorbed in atmosphere at 10.6 um. Despite being in a minor atmospheric window the absorption is still much higher than in visible or near IR. In addition higher wavelengths means wider beam divergence, which is the exact opposite of a good drone weapon. You should not use the same wavelengths on an antidrone weapon.I'd appreciate it if one of the few people here who know what they're talking about like @FairAndUnbiased and @WTAN could shed some light (no pun) on this question: What's the difference between the light source of an LPP EUVL machine and a laser weapon like the Silent Hunter? Both are around the same power, 30 kW for the MOPA lasers ASML uses (and China is rumoured to have recently developed) and 30-100kW quoted for Silent Hunter.
I'd say that for anti drone weapon you'd use a laser in the visible window at near IR, both for low beam divergence and for low atmospheric attenuation, so it'll be a fiber laser, and Silent Hunter is a fiber laser.