AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
There's an assumption that journalists do their due diligence in writing articles. They make sure to dot their "i"s and cross their "t"s. No they don't. It's like what I've noted before in this forum where there was a story that said Chinese were buying up French vineyards that outraged the French. Multiple other articles afterwards said the same things. One wine journalist was going to write a story too but then decided he was going to fly to France to see himself if this were happening. He found out nothing of the sort was happening. So it only takes one lying journalist to make up a story and then other journalists will write stories themselves based that original article without ever checking to see if it was true because they all wanted to believe it. My question is how do they think the US can stop China just from stopping the West from selling the tools to China? How did they come up with these tools themselves? It's because they're going on the assumption only white people with the superior genetic intelligence can create these tools. Why is there such a thing as intellectual property? It's because it's the only thing out there that prevents someone from copying that technology for themselves. If something like that could be kept secret and prevent others from copying, you wouldn't need intellectual property rights. In order for someone to claim intellectual property, they have to show how it's done in order to establish in a society of laws that someone used the same exact methods and copied it. There's not only one way to do things in most things. So if someone finds another way of doing something, they can't claim IP theft. Google came up with what is said to be the beginnings of a quantum computer. Then China came up with their own equivalent but it uses a totally new different system that uses lasers and mirrors. Just because Google came up with a quantum computer first, does it mean they hold the intellectual property to anything called a quantum computer and China stole it from them even though it's an entirely different process? There's no byline on this article so it's safe to assume it was written by editors of the Economist that know nothing about science and engineering and are going by what many Westerners want to believe that it's about genetic superiority to believe China has to get the tools from them in order to deny them and not just the Chinese can come up with it on their own. If that were the case, why are they worried about China's rise in technology if inferior genetics will stop the Chinese on its own?
Remember when China started to develop aircraft carriers, the West said it takes 40 years to master aircraft carriers so China shouldn't bother. Was it because the West were good fellas giving China sage advice? No, they were just trying to stop China from building aircraft carriers.
Last edited:
So you can tell the difference between 180nm and 55nm in the logic chip image you shared?
