b787
Captain
it is Russian it has BBC that in Russian means Russian air forceIs that what I think it is? Or is it a Russian AF one?
it is Russian it has BBC that in Russian means Russian air forceIs that what I think it is? Or is it a Russian AF one?
How many have been delivered so far?
China receives new batch of Russian advanced Su-35 fighter jets
By -
Dec 1, 2017
China has taken delivery the newt batch of the Sukhoi Su-35 “Flanker-E” fighter jets from Russia.
Live flight-tracking website Flightradar24 also noted that an Ilyushin Il-76TD transport aircraft made by Volga-Dnepr (RA-76952), a Russian charter company, departed from Komsomolsk-on-Amur making its way to Cangzhou-Cangxian Airbase in China’s northern province of Hebei, where the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Production Association (KnAAPO) builds Su-35s.
The Il-76TD transport aircraft was accompanying the five Su-35 fighter jets. The aircraft made a flight from Russia to China in the group.
The People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) currently possesses Su-35 “Flanker-E” fighter jets out of 24 aircraft.
China confirmed in November 2015 that it signed a $2 billion contract with Russia for the acquisition of 24 Su-35s, following more than five years of on-again, off-again negotiations for the aircraft.
On December 25, the first Su-35 “Flanker-E” fighter jets of PLAAF landed at Suixi Airbase in Guangdong Province, the nearest Chinese airbase to the South China Sea.
China bought a large number of Su-27 and Su-30 multirole fighter jets from Russia in the 1990s and early 2000s. China also has built licensed variants. These Sukhoi planes are a pillar of the PLA Air Force and the PLA Navy’s aviation wing.
3rd yes but as soon as they cross the border there are many less traces and you need a fine sleuthI believe this is a "baker's dozen of 13" SU-35s on Chinese soil, I believe this is the third shipment! outstanding development for Sukhoi and the PLAAF!
Deino, the SU-35 is now a Chinese Flanker,, it is the "best Flanker!", and whether anyone realizes it, China is very interested in building the "best Flanker's,,, and I would bet my last Ben Franklin, that there are no doubt those in China, who have looked longingly at the SU-57, and no doubt in my mind, they have "talked about building something similar"??
aircraft designers and builders, "are always looking at the best and thinking about how to make it better!"
most of us stated very vehemently that the Chinese would NEVER buy the SU-35! we were wrong!
I’ve moved our discussion on the Su-57 to here.
I admit that I was one of those who didn’t think China should buy the Su-35. Apparently, the PLAAF thought otherwise. I also highly doubted that China had bought them because of all the crying wolf from the Russians. Apparently I was wrong.
Please note that my objection has never been about the quality of the Su-35. I have insisted from the beginning that the Su-35 is an awesome fighter plane, one of the best. I have never questioned that. My objection of the purchase is purely from a strategic standpoint. I have always felt that China should go through the growing pain. No matter how painful it is, China needs to throw away their crutches. China needs to become independent in their weapons development programs.
And here I come again with my own uneducated opinion. The Russians asked China to join them in the development of the Su-57. But China declined. If the Chinese were truly interested in the Su-57, they would have agreed, especially when it was requested by the Russians. That was way before the J-20 came out. If the J-20 has not gone smoothly, the Chinese might also be convinced to join the Su-57 development. As far as we can tell, the J-20 is going very smoothly. There is even less incentive for the Chinese to join / buy the Su-57 at this point.
China bought only 24 Su-35’s. That suggests to me that the Chinese wanted the Su-35 for its technology, not the actual planes for use. As someone mentioned yesterday, it could be the fly control software. It sounds logical to me.
And let’s look at what’s new on the Su-57. Stealth shape? China’s own J-20 and the J-31 both have stealth shape that is, at least, as good as the Su-57. In my own opinion, the J-20 and the J-31 are both completely new designs that incorporate pure stealth tech. The Su-57, on the other hand, is a Flanker derivative.
The Su-57 have TVC. The Su-35 has them too. And China has obtained copies of the Su-35 along with its awesome engines for a while now. No need to get the Su-57 again.
Other aspects? In my own opinion, China is ahead of the Russians. And the Chinese have been ahead for a while. My own opinion.
I’ve moved our discussion on the Su-57 to here.
I admit that I was one of those who didn’t think China should buy the Su-35. Apparently, the PLAAF thought otherwise. I also highly doubted that China had bought them because of all the crying wolf from the Russians. Apparently I was wrong.
Please note that my objection has never been about the quality of the Su-35. I have insisted from the beginning that the Su-35 is an awesome fighter plane, one of the best. I have never questioned that. My objection of the purchase is purely from a strategic standpoint. I have always felt that China should go through the growing pain. No matter how painful it is, China needs to throw away their crutches. China needs to become independent in their weapons development programs.
And here I come again with my own uneducated opinion. The Russians asked China to join them in the development of the Su-57. But China declined. If the Chinese were truly interested in the Su-57, they would have agreed, especially when it was requested by the Russians. That was way before the J-20 came out. If the J-20 has not gone smoothly, the Chinese might also be convinced to join the Su-57 development. As far as we can tell, the J-20 is going very smoothly. There is even less incentive for the Chinese to join / buy the Su-57 at this point.
China bought only 24 Su-35’s. That suggests to me that the Chinese wanted the Su-35 for its technology, not the actual planes for use. As someone mentioned yesterday, it could be the fly control software. It sounds logical to me.
And let’s look at what’s new on the Su-57. Stealth shape? China’s own J-20 and the J-31 both have stealth shape that is, at least, as good as the Su-57. In my own opinion, the J-20 and the J-31 are both completely new designs that incorporate pure stealth tech. The Su-57, on the other hand, is a Flanker derivative.
The Su-57 have TVC. The Su-35 has them too. And China has obtained copies of the Su-35 along with its awesome engines for a while now. No need to get the Su-57 again.
Other aspects? In my own opinion, China is ahead of the Russians. And the Chinese have been ahead for a while. My own opinion.
May I add:My thoughts on why the Su-35s were purchased by the PLAAF:
1. DACT. Their livery, all camouflage-y much like the OPFOR Su-30MKKs, is suggestive of this.
2. Engines. Although unlikely unless we see Su-35s being taken apart, they might use the opportunity to study the effect of TVC on flight performance and how to optimize their own Flankers (read: J-11D) in order to maximize that aspect, given the advent of TVC WS-10.
3. Stop-gap between the J-11Bs and the delayed introduction of J-11Ds. Although 24 seems to be quite a low number for this role.