If I understood correctly, this clearly showed isolation from a so-called "liberal wing" and carte blanche to build a "people-centered economy". Other elements should be highlighted, such as a shift in the power axis of the country from Shanghai and Guangdong to the CCP's own bureaucracy. This internal dispute is old and only after the complete withdrawal of the almost centenary Jiang Zemin from the scene did this issue begin to move in favor of the party bureaucracy, evident that all this has consequences. The internal bourgeoisie loses even more strength, its isolation is clearly accentuated. Foreign policy does not change with Foreign Minister Wang Yi remaining in the Central Committee. Policies to combat corruption, taxation of large fortunes and increasing the dominance of public forms of property will be deepened. A turn to the 'left'. In my view, this is a binary way of dealing with power issues in China. What happens is the need to make certain decisions that did not make sense twenty years ago, but make the class struggle in the country must intensify with workers occupying even more space in the historical power bloc that came to power in 1949. In ten years 150 million peasants with Taoist and rebellious DNA became urban workers. China is the country where there are more strikes in the world as wages have grown above GDP, inflation and labor productivity. The composition of the Central Committee, by privileging an immense presence of scientists, signals to the world the growing power and role of these figures in a country that is being banned from accessing semiconductor infrastructure supply lines.The next five years will be crucial.