You are playing dumb again. There is only one possible interpretation. You think the flower boy is what sexually arouses women. When I called you out for your insane opinion, you try to spin it as my "misunderstanding you".
Here's a recap:
1. you think a 117 lb flower boy is a women's sexual fantasy.
2. you keep dodging every request for proof for your unfounded opinions.
3. yet, you claim my opinions, which are backed up by sources, are "out of touch and dumb."
4. you try to put words in my mouth (I said, look effeminate, you claimed I wrote act effeminate)
and you did it again here.
I didn't write all Chinese men were turning into flower boys.
you wrote "Chinese men were all turning into flower boys"
5. you put up strawman arguments.
6. you are crazy enough to think many men don't try to cater to women's desires when I proved multiple examples of men doing just that.
7. you constantly change topics like a coward and attack me instead of addressing the arguments.
8. When confronted with iron clad proof, you even pull the most typical Western response, "that's propaganda, that can't be trusted".
Here are some parting gifts in case any observers still have any doubt how deceptive and cowardly you really are:
Young men go under the knife for more feminine faces
. chinadaily.com.cn/china/2006-11/03/content_724256.htm
but but but...Solarz told me this should never happen!
the key line in there translates to :
辛识平：“娘炮”之风当休矣-新华网
. xinhuanet.com/politics/2018-09/06/c_1123391309.htm
but but but...Solarz told me this should never happen!
What now, Solarz?
"omg! Chinadaily (a state news group) is run by hostile foreign forces. They can't be trusted!
"Oh noes! Xinhua (a state news group) is ALSO run by capitalist roaders and imperialist running dogs! We can't trust them either."
So, on my side is the
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xinhua, China Daily and sociology observations vs you, Dr "Lu Han (117 lbs) is a female fantasy...he's got the porn star look".
You can have the last word. I'm not going to waste any more time talking to a coward who refuses to acknowledge the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. You argue in bad faith and exhibit extreme stubbornness against the facts.
