Chinese Engine Development

Mearex

New Member
Registered Member
They sure know that. The linked article actually said that. Here I quote.
全电推进是实现航空零排放的终极目标,预测电池能量密度在未来30年内几乎不可能取得突破性进展
Translate, full electric propulsion is the ultimate target, BUT in the next 30 years it is almost impossible for battery to realized that goal.

China always walk on her feet, does what is within reach instead of bloated dreams.

ICE has no place in mainstream aviation though. GT is the best for hybrid aircraft due to its high power density.
ain't no way we are resorting to flying appliances :(
 

nemo

Junior Member
View attachment 149833
There might be a typo here. Should just be 发电机, aka generator, and not generator controller.

Anyways, I know this is technically hybrid, but given how much China is pushing for pure EV cars, I sure hope they don't do the same to planes. Don't want them to become soulless as well. The Internal Combustion Engine must live on.
GCU generator control unit

 

qwerty3173

Just Hatched
Registered Member
right, but 9+ is still more than 7. I meant that if ws-15 indeed has more twr than F119, it'll feel almost surreal cuz of how much praise the F-22 gets for its engines and how much China gets dunked on for the belief that they can't make capable engines
Well to be honest, the f-119 package includes a gigantic and unwieldy thrust vectoring nozzle, so the twr is not as bad as it seems. Without it twr is still around 9+ i believe.
 

qwerty3173

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Nowadays twr is far from the main objective of designing engines actually, it used to be important because jet engines had a lot of dead weight, but now engines are a lot lighter than the fuel tank, so fuel efficiency is even more important. Twr 10+ is more than enough and probably won't be improved greatly in the next few decades.
 
Top