I don't think they're exhausts, but the rear casing of the engines just before the vanes. Its possible that the plane had its engines removed, suggesting that it was indeed testing engines. Nozzle vanes can't be too short. You have to consider the angle of the vanes if they're too short and in the most throttled position.
To make my point better, here is the J-11B stress test platform without the engines.
This only makes me more uneasy. We can clearly see the WS-10A on this prototype, why do all the J-11B prototypes have exhausts that look nothing like this.
all the operational J-11B fighters and the final version of J-11B prototype are using FWS-10 engines .
The exhausts look identical, but different from all other Su-27's and J-11's, which makes me believe that the testbed and J-11BS are equipped with WS-10a. I just don't understand why the exhausts on J-11b's, if they are equipped with WS-10a, do not look like this. Unless, the WS-10a engines have been redesigned since then, or, the J-11 testbed photo also has its engines removed, just like you suggest the J-11BS prototype might.
I think we saw this in Zhuhai airshow. Is this the much talked about WS-12?
I don't think the WS-10a is a copy, I just think Western sources assume China copies everything.
Is this photo not a J-11B?
[qimg]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_IEJ3-_kC6JI/SA_dpDx6lLI/AAAAAAAAC28/iAxp_hJiHm4/s400/j11_01.jpg[/qimg]
The nozzels on this craft do not look like WS-10a. Perhaps initial J-11B's used AL-31F? Or just early J-11B prototypes?
Oooh.. Interesting..Chief designer Zhangenhe in the general assembly workshop of Taihang engine (mass production)
[qimg]http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/attachments/Mon_0904/27_77564_ad265b295387347.jpg[/qimg]