... ... continue on the theme of ...searching and deploying as many as one can find <Think-with-No-Box-type-Design-Engineers> to break this <ongoing-frustration-to-the-roof> bottleneck on China jet engine development
Hopefully, all those calling the shot on all China jet engine development projects are wholeheartedly embracing 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing technology, but more importantly those calling the shot in China staff their research teams with at minimum 10 <Think-with-No-Box-type> Design-Engineers, even though if they have shaky academic background. ** Why 10 ? Critical mass for brainstorming to counter the skepticism from the conservative-think-inside-the-box engineers.
If those calling the shot in China jet engine development projects are the narrow-minded-conservative-type, adopting the attitude of dismissing the 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing technology like those people quoted above, then we all are doomed to suffer this anxiety and ongoing-frustration-to-the-roof waiting for the breakthrough on China jet engine development or at the most only watching tiny-incremental progress until the dawn of 4-D objects populating the horizon.
Yes, it is not a typo ... ... 4-D objects with complex geometry that can move by themselves, and the 4-D objects its Future-is-Now, because it has been empowered and forced multiplied by Skylar Tibbits & his team by using 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing tech.
I, personally hope that China jet engine development projects can be (or had been) empowered and forced multiplied by <Think-with-No-Box-type> Design-Engineers using 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing tech
Source_1: <Ms. Amrita Jayakumar ~ WashingtonPost>:
Source_2: <Mr. Michael Molitch-Hou ~ http://3dprintingindustry.com/>:
Source_3: <Mr. Skylar Tibbits ~ smithsonianmag.com>:
source:<Ms. Amrita Jayakumar ~ WashingtonPost> *** Lockheed Martin, Boeing and other aerospace companies have already embraced the concept of using 3-D printers to manufacture small parts. For example, Lockheed’s Juno spacecraft, which is on its way to explore Jupiter, relies on a set of 3-D printed brackets. Boeing has used several 3-D printed parts in its airplanes, including the Dreamliner. Northrop Grumman has a titanium component in its X-47B unmanned aircraft built for the Navy and 3-D printed parts in the F-35 fighter jet
source:<Mr. Michael Molitch-Hou ~ http://3dprintingindustry.com/> *** For instance, Lockheed Martin’s Brian Rosenberger explained that the company has been using AM since the 90’s. In fact, Lockheed Martin has long been taking advantage of Sciaky’s free form electron beam 3D printer that is capable of manufacturing huge titanium parts. Though their robotic arm, which welds metallic wire with an electron beam, can produce parts up to 22 feet long, the parts require post processing. In researching the 3D printing of F-35 jet parts, portions of the tail and wing, the company prints metal parts with an extra ¼” of material, which is then machined to fit the proper specifications
Hopefully, all those calling the shot on all China jet engine development projects are wholeheartedly embracing 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing technology, but more importantly those calling the shot in China staff their research teams with at minimum 10 <Think-with-No-Box-type> Design-Engineers, even though if they have shaky academic background. ** Why 10 ? Critical mass for brainstorming to counter the skepticism from the conservative-think-inside-the-box engineers.
source:<Mr. Michael Molitch-Hou ~ http://3dprintingindustry.com/> *** I approached a few more traditional companies — materials suppliers, laser cutting and CNC bureaus, and other exhibitor booths that weren’t quarantined in the 3D printing area of the showroom floor — about their interest in 3D printing. Did they work with 3D printing companies to develop composites? Did they provide quality control systems for manufacturers that used AM? And, more often than not, the answer was “no”. A majority of the booths I talked to didn’t seem to have an interest in the technology. I thought it strange to be indifferent to an emerging technology that could ... ...
If those calling the shot in China jet engine development projects are the narrow-minded-conservative-type, adopting the attitude of dismissing the 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing technology like those people quoted above, then we all are doomed to suffer this anxiety and ongoing-frustration-to-the-roof waiting for the breakthrough on China jet engine development or at the most only watching tiny-incremental progress until the dawn of 4-D objects populating the horizon.
Yes, it is not a typo ... ... 4-D objects with complex geometry that can move by themselves, and the 4-D objects its Future-is-Now, because it has been empowered and forced multiplied by Skylar Tibbits & his team by using 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing tech.
I, personally hope that China jet engine development projects can be (or had been) empowered and forced multiplied by <Think-with-No-Box-type> Design-Engineers using 3-DP_Additive-Manufacturing tech
Source_1: <Ms. Amrita Jayakumar ~ WashingtonPost>:
Source_2: <Mr. Michael Molitch-Hou ~ http://3dprintingindustry.com/>:
Source_3: <Mr. Skylar Tibbits ~ smithsonianmag.com>:
Last edited: