Re: J-20 The New Generation Fighter Thread IV
You are right about the bypass ratios, but I've not read anything about F-110 being selected over F-100 because of its bypass ratio lending itself better to "strike aircraft," especially when all the hundreds of F-16s, export F-15K/SGs, etc all have air superiority as a primary mission alongside strike. That is to say, just because they are "strike" aircraft, does not mean they need to fly in a specifically different aerodynamic profile to "pure air to air combat" aircraft.
Btw the USAF's F-15Es are powered by F100s over F110s, whereas export F-15K and SGs are equipped with F110s, and all F-16s since the mid C blocks were powered by F110s as well.
you're making a few very big claims on dubious associations.
Because F-110 has larger by pass ratio just like the WS-10A around 0.8. This make the engine more fuel efficient than the F-100 which has a by pass ratio of just 0.36 and AL-31F with 0.6.
F-110 and WS-10A are better for fighter bomber or strike fighters like F-15E, F-15K, J-16 and even J-15. But for pure air to air combat F-100 and AL-31F are superior due to their better acceleration (smaller by pass ratio !!!))
This is why F-15C, and F-16 use F-100 while F-15E/E, F-15K and J-16 all use F-100 and WS-10A !!
You are right about the bypass ratios, but I've not read anything about F-110 being selected over F-100 because of its bypass ratio lending itself better to "strike aircraft," especially when all the hundreds of F-16s, export F-15K/SGs, etc all have air superiority as a primary mission alongside strike. That is to say, just because they are "strike" aircraft, does not mean they need to fly in a specifically different aerodynamic profile to "pure air to air combat" aircraft.
Btw the USAF's F-15Es are powered by F100s over F110s, whereas export F-15K and SGs are equipped with F110s, and all F-16s since the mid C blocks were powered by F110s as well.
you're making a few very big claims on dubious associations.