Chinese Economics Thread

Blackstone

Brigadier
It is indeed many members' problem that you are a fabois of China hate.
I linked articles with statements from high-ranking US/Western officers, questioning the J-20's capabilities, and you objected not on substance, but on pique. Are you the type who only want to see positive things posted about the J-20 and nothing negative?
 

broadsword

Brigadier
I linked articles with statements from high-ranking US/Western officers, questioning the J-20's capabilities, and you objected not on substance, but on pique. Are you the type who only want to see positive things posted about the J-20 and nothing negative?

I was referring to your APC post. If you had engaged in rational thinking, you would not have posted it with your comment. And that makes you a China hate fanboi.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
I was referring to your APC post. If you had engaged in rational thinking, you would not have posted it with your comment. And that makes you a China hate fanboi.
The APC post... okay, let's get to the bottom of it. My comment of the linked Armored Personnel Carrier article was it (the article) wasn't positive feedback on Chinese APC. What part of that troubled you?
 

broadsword

Brigadier
The APC post... okay, let's get to the bottom of it. My comment of the linked Armored Personnel Carrier article was it (the article) wasn't positive feedback on Chinese APC. What part of that troubled you?

Your failure to understand why it could not resist an IED that you had to post it with your comment. Your hate showed you up.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Your failure to understand why it could not resist an IED that you had to post it with your comment. Your hate showed you up.
Alright t2, I tried to give you some credit for reason, but you're just not up to it. I know better now. I will treat you in kind from now on.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
So you are not denying your hate, am I right?
I'm not denying I think you're playing elementary school games, and I'll no longer take you seriously. You had your chance to have rational debates, and you chose to play teenager games instead. I will treat you as a child from now on, and mostly ignore you.
 

broadsword

Brigadier
I'm not denying I think you're playing elementary school games, and I'll no longer take you seriously. You had your chance to have rational debates, and you chose to play teenager games instead. I will treat you as a child from now on, and mostly ignore you.

No one is playing like you. You have been playing hide-and-seek with fellow members with regard to your intent. No that they do not know. They just don't want to play games with a child like you. I just happen to have time on my hand. You already knew how I regard you.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
The APC post... okay, let's get to the bottom of it. My comment of the linked Armored Personnel Carrier article was it (the article) wasn't positive feedback on Chinese APC. What part of that troubled you?
Why do you keep asking this question like it hasn't been answered numerous times?

1. Your source is questionable. It's an odd forum with no author's name emblazoned with weird phrases with a cult-like mural as the background. It's not professional at all nor does it strive to be. It doesn't even mention what the vehicle was hit with, what model, how large the IED. Hell, it doesn't even say what year it happened in. Cheap Chinese vehicle blew up from IED in Kenya is all it provided.
2. People have already told you, IEDs blow up armored vehicles from any country, and have provided evidence. So if someone bought a Chinese military vehicle but had negative reviews because it was blown up by a weapon that it was not made to withstand, that's the operator's fault. You can't buy a Camry, drive it off a cliff, then blame Toyota that you couldn't just flip it back over and keep driving home. (Do we even have official comments from the operator?)

Why do you keep asking what's wrong with your post as if no one could come up with anything other than FU?
 
Last edited:
Top