manqiangrexue
Brigadier
It does. It does and I can't be reading 80 pages of J-20 thread to bring up your articles again. It makes no sense for US officials to divulge the classified knowledge that it takes to make any valuable assessment and if they gave their evaluations, then it most likely means they had no classified intel to draw from at all. But I recall that unqualified sources was the complaint against at least some of your posts. Anyway, enough about what I recall."Liberal Arts majors and whatnot?" Really? Care to put your own words to the test?
The articles I listed questioning J-20's mightiness had sources from high-ranking US/Western officers and intelligence sources. Some posters objected to my posts and suggested US officials and agencies were less dependable on the J-20 than the Chinese Internet rumor mill. One poster said I shouldn't post them (the linked articles) at all. I disagree.
The test for you is see if you can be intellectually honest on making charges like "posting junk, liberal arts... yada yada." Unfortunately, it does mean you'll have to go back and read the entire thread to make an honest evaluation.
Yesterday you were called out on the Chinese military export page for posting biased reports from this: , a blog with what appears to be a picture of an Indian Deity inscribed with "Internal Revolutions! Chaos! Debt Crisis! External Wars!" as the background and not even an author's name attached to it. Looks like an Indian kid's rage/worship website and you posted it as a credible source for debate. That's proof already.