Chinese Economics Thread

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
"Liberal Arts majors and whatnot?" Really? Care to put your own words to the test?

The articles I listed questioning J-20's mightiness had sources from high-ranking US/Western officers and intelligence sources. Some posters objected to my posts and suggested US officials and agencies were less dependable on the J-20 than the Chinese Internet rumor mill. One poster said I shouldn't post them (the linked articles) at all. I disagree.

The test for you is see if you can be intellectually honest on making charges like "posting junk, liberal arts... yada yada." Unfortunately, it does mean you'll have to go back and read the entire thread to make an honest evaluation.
It does. It does and I can't be reading 80 pages of J-20 thread to bring up your articles again. It makes no sense for US officials to divulge the classified knowledge that it takes to make any valuable assessment and if they gave their evaluations, then it most likely means they had no classified intel to draw from at all. But I recall that unqualified sources was the complaint against at least some of your posts. Anyway, enough about what I recall.

Yesterday you were called out on the Chinese military export page for posting biased reports from this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, a blog with what appears to be a picture of an Indian Deity inscribed with "Internal Revolutions! Chaos! Debt Crisis! External Wars!" as the background and not even an author's name attached to it. Looks like an Indian kid's rage/worship website and you posted it as a credible source for debate. That's proof already.
 
Baoji -Lanzhou HSR trial

what do they say? LOL I think I figured just the speed, just at this moment:
WvzrN.jpg
 

delft

Brigadier
Abe is double betting, or standing on two boats "脚踩两只船".

Japan is welcomed and always welcome on board of OBOR if Abe moves his foot out of boat TPP and stop lecturing others about "international norm" and following TPP standards. Most of us here know what TPP really is and China is not a fun of it.

It is a "critical juncture" for Japan as Abe said, because the two boats may (very likely) sail further apart, standing on both of them will get Japan falling into the water if not making a quick choice.
TPP's purpose was to exclude China and Japan taking part in RCEP and OBOR destroys that purpose.
 

vesicles

Colonel
what do they say? LOL I think I figured just the speed, just at this moment:
WvzrN.jpg

Just based on what says on the screen, it says "Speed: 246.0 km/h" and " distance: 1311.901 km". No idea what other stuff is... Something like "number of fire flower"? What is that?
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
What fanbois? You posted unsubstatiated material. That makes you a faboi of China hate.
What are you talking about? I linked articles with sources form US flag officers and US/Western defense experts. You don't like what the article says, that's your problem.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Just based on what says on the screen, it says "Speed: 246.0 km/h" and " distance: 1311.901 km". No idea what other stuff is... Something like "number of fire flower"? What is that?
  1. If I am not mistaken, the speed reached no less than 301km/h in another photo I have seen.
  2. Number of sparks when pantograph disconnected from the overhead power line: 0
 
Top