Chinese Economics Thread

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
While everyone is bothered with something else...


China takes charge of keys to technologies' future

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China has triumphed in a 15-year quest to become the “ultimate monopolist” in the supply of rare earth metals — a dominance that industry experts say could give Beijing control over the future of consumer electronics and green technology.

Industry sources believe that with China dramatically cutting its annual rare earth export quotas, the time may be rapidly approaching when it will be impossible for any company to produce a wind turbine or hybrid electric car outside the communist country.

After a long, relentless campaign of price wars and export quota reductions, more than 95 per cent of the global supply of rare earth metals — a group of 17 “lanthanide” elements employed in hundreds of technologies ranging from mobile phones and BlackBerrys to lasers and aviation — is produced by China.

Although China has the resources and refinery capacity to produce enough lanthanum, terbium, neodymium and dysprosium to satisfy a global demand that is rising at 10 per year, its rare earth export allocation for the whole world this year is expected to be about 38,000 tonnes — less than the quantity required by Japan alone.

Furthermore, as the world tries to make itself more energy-efficient, China's dominant position will become more strategically critical because of the wide range of cutting-edge environmental technologies, such as wind turbines, low-energy light bulbs and hybrid cars, that depend heavily on the rare earth metals.

Jack Lifton, an expert on rare earths, said: “Deng Xiaoping's comment in 1997, where he said that China would be for rare earth metals what the Middle East was to oil, has become a very stark reality. The world has to wake up and start thinking of this group of elements as the ‘technology metals' without which there will be no technology. China is already working out how these metals are going to give its companies a competitiveness that the rest of the world will find very difficult to match.”

China's rising strength in rare earth supply and its apparent willingness to use that as “a 21st-century economic weapon” have triggered what government sources in Tokyo told The Times was an invisible tsunami of panic in Japanese industry, which in turn has called on the Government to fight its corner with Beijing. Japan, which imports nearly 100 per cent of its rare earths from China, sees the group of elements as a probable battleground for future trade wars.

Toyota and other big carmakers are hurrying to secure alternative supplies in Vietnam and Malaysia. Mines in the United States that were forced out of business by price wars may be brought back into use. Yet many industry observers believe that Beijing may engineer a global supply crunch before any serious rival sources become available.

China's strategy, said Yoichi Sato, head of the rare earth division of Mitsui, suggested a complex game being played between Beijing and the world's rare earth consumers. The perceived idea behind China restricting its rare earth exports is twofold. First, it gives its own high-tech industries a chance to flourish and gain a huge competitive edge over rivals in Asia, Europe and the US — a politically useful gambit by a Government whose legitimacy lies in the provision of jobs and economic growth. Second, it may force foreign companies to move their high-tech factories and research centres to China to circumvent quotas, a move that Japanese companies will resist for fear of losing industrial secrets.

Mr Sato also believes that China will seek to use its existing monopoly status to crush any competition that emerges. Although about 42 per cent of worldwide reserves of rare earth ores lie outside China, very few places have significant refinery capacity.

Mr Sato said: “Of course many people are looking at establishing alternative refineries and sources outside China, but the investment is not necessarily a sound one because of the threat of price revenge by China. If new projects emerge, as they have recently in Malaysia and Australia, China could just drop its prices and force rivals out of business.”

Prospects of developing the industry outside China have been hit by a sudden decision by investors in Lynas, the Australian group, to pull funding for a project under which a big refinery would have been built in Malaysia for operation by the end of this year. A company source said that the project, which would have given companies such as Toyota and Honda a welcome diversity of supply, is unlikely now to open as scheduled.

Moreover, China's push to remain the globally dominant player appears to have intensified. Within the past fortnight, a Chinese investment company has acquired 25 per cent of Arafura Resources, an Australian rare earth miner, and last month China Minmetals Rare Earth Company laid out plans to invest $300 million (£212 million) to cement its position as the globally dominant corporate force in the field.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
The most notable element used in the production of AESA radars, for example among other things, is Gallium.

Yet according to this, the biggest supplier of this element to the United States is no other than...China.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Company with the biggest production---Chinalco.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Scratch

Captain
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China's trade decline eases in March

he plunge in Chinese exports that has wiped out millions of jobs eased in March amid signs the collapse in global demand might be bottoming out.

Exports fell 17 percent in March from a year earlier, the fifth straight monthly decline but less severe than February's 25.7 plunge, the sharpest in a decade, the customs agency reported Friday. It said trade "showed clear signs of improvement."

"It says we're no longer in freefall," said economist David Cohen of Action Economics in Singapore. "It's still down sharply year-on-year. But it's an optimistic sign for the Chinese economy as well as the whole world."

Imports fell by 25.7 percent, widening the Chinese trade surplus to $18.6 billion from February's $4.8 billion gap.

The plunge in demand for Chinese goods has thrown at least 20 million people out of work as factories closed, prompting Beijing to launch a huge stimulus plan to ease reliance on exports by pumping up domestic consumption.

A survey of Chinese companies released last week showed manufacturing expanding slightly in March following a months-long contraction. It also showed the drop in export orders was easing.

Beijing has taken steps to hold down the price of exports by cutting taxes on exporters and stopping the rise of China's tightly controlled currency, the yuan, against the U.S. dollar. Economists say both steps could strain relations with trading partners if China is seen to be competing unfairly.

The continued weakness in imports will hurt other Asian economies, which supply Chinese factories with raw materials and industrial components. But analysts say imports should pick up as factories run down stockpiles of materials and need to buy more.

Imports are expected to get a boost from the 4 trillion yuan ($586 billion) stimulus package, which aims to pump money into the economy through higher spending on construction of airports and other public works. That is expected to drive demand for materials such as imported iron ore to produce steel.

"Export activity showed signs of stabilization, reflecting modest improvement in global demand," Jing Ulrich, chairwoman of China equities for J.P. Morgan, said in a report. "There are some initial signs of recovery in China's raw materials demand, driven by government stockpiling and record imports of iron ore."

China's global exports in March totaled $90.3 billion, while imports were $71.7 billion, the customs agency reported.

China posted a $10.2 billion trade surplus with the United States as exports to the U.S. market fell 12.6 percent to $16.4 billion, while imports of American goods dropped 12.7 percent to $6.2 billion.

The country's trade surplus with the 27-nation European Union was $8 billion as exports plunged 20.2 percent to $17.2 billion, while imports of European goods declined 17.4 percent to $9.2 billion.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
'Copper Standard' for the world's currency system?

Hard money enthusiasts have long watched for signs that China is switching its foreign reserves from US Treasury bonds into gold bullion. They may have been eyeing the wrong metal.

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Last Updated: 2:41PM BST 16 Apr 2009
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China's State Reserves Bureau (SRB) has instead been buying copper and other industrial metals over recent months on a scale that appears to go beyond the usual rebuilding of stocks for commercial reasons.

Nobu Su, head of Taiwan's TMT group, which ships commodities to China, said Beijing is trying to extricate itself from dollar dependency as fast as it can.

"China has woken up. The West is a black hole with all this money being printed. The Chinese are buying raw materials because it is a much better way to use their $1.9 trillion of reserves. They get ten times the impact, and can cover their infrastructure for 50 years."

"The next industrial revolution is going to be led by hybrid cars, and that needs copper. You can see the subtle way that China is moving into 30 or 40 countries with resources," he said.

The SRB has also been accumulating aluminium, zinc, nickel, and rarer metals such as titanium, indium (thin-film technology), rhodium (catalytic converters) and praseodymium (glass).

While it makes sense for China to take advantage of last year's commodity crash to restock cheaply, there is clearly more behind the move. "They are definitely buying metals to diversify out of US Treasuries and dollar holdings," said Jim Lennon, head of commodities at Macquarie Bank.

John Reade, metals chief at UBS, said Beijing may have a made strategic decision to stockpile metal as an alternative to foreign bonds. "We're very surprised by Chinese demand. They are buying much more copper than they will need this year. If this is strategic, there may be no effective limit on the purchases as China's pockets are deep."

Zhou Xiaochuan, the central bank governor, piqued the interest of metal buffs last month by calling for a world currency modelled on the "Bancor", floated by John Maynard Keynes at Bretton Woods in 1944.

The Bancor was to be anchored on 30 commodities - a broader base than the Gold Standard, which had caused so much grief in the 1930s. Mr Zhou said such a currency would prevent the sort of "credit-based" excess that has brought the global finance to its knees.

If his thoughts reflect Communist Party thinking, it would explain the bizarre moves in commodity markets over recent weeks. Copper prices have surged 49pc this year to $4,925 a tonne despite estimates by the CRU copper group that world demand will fall 15pc to 20pc this year as construction wilts.

Analysts say "short covering" by funds betting on price falls has played a role. But the jump is largely due to Chinese imports, which reached a record 329,000 tonnes in February, and a further 375,000 tonnes in March. Chinese industrial demand cannot explain this. China has been badly hit by global recession. Its exports - almost half GDP - fell 17pc in March.

While Beijing's fiscal stimulus package and credit expansion has helped lift demand, China faces a property downturn of its own. One government adviser warned this week that house prices could fall 50pc.

One thing is clear: Beijing suspects that the US Federal Reserve is engineering a covert default on America's debt by printing money. Premier Wen Jiabao issued a blunt warning last month that China was tiring of US bonds. "We have lent a huge amount of money to the US, so of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets," he said.

The beauty of recycling China's surplus into metals instead of US bonds is that it kills so many birds with one stone: it stops the yuan rising, without provoking complaints of currency manipulation by Washington; metals are easily stored in warehouses, unlike oil; the holdings are likely to rise in value over time since the earth's crust is gradually depleting its accessible ores. Above all, such a policy safeguards China's industrial revolution, while the West may one day face a supply crisis.

Beijing may yet buy gold as well, although it has not done so yet. The gold share of reserves has fallen to 1pc, far below the historic norm in Asia. But if a metal-based currency ever emerges to end the reign of fiat paper, it is just as likely to be a "Copper Standard" as a "Gold Standard".

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Zhou Xiaochuan, the central bank governor, piqued the interest of metal buffs last month by calling for a world currency modelled on the "Bancor", floated by John Maynard Keynes at Bretton Woods in 1944.

The Bancor was to be anchored on 30 commodities - a broader base than the Gold Standard, which had caused so much grief in the 1930s. Mr Zhou said such a currency would prevent the sort of "credit-based" excess that has brought the global finance to its knees.

Interestingly enough, I watched an interview with the head of the IMF last night, where; under pressure from the interviewer, he said something very similar and cited Keynes at the same conference.

It also would appear that the Chinese downturn has bottomed out and that the coming quarter should see signs of sharp recovery.

I am also struck by the the doomsters trumpeting unemployment in China. The PRC may well have about 20 million unemployed, but the EU was hitting a similar number by the end of February, while the US has unemployment among 13.5 million based on job losses of full time positions, a figure that also rises close to 20 million once part time job losses are also included (currently excluded from official US figures) in the equation.
 

crobato

Colonel
VIP Professional
The US has to use soft power to counter China's soft power. Nothing wrong with that, in the end, the poor people in the Third World will be helped with the peaceful rivalry.


U.S. Struggles to Adapt to China's Economic Strategy
David Axe | Bio | 15 Apr 2009
World Politics Review
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The tiny desert town of Abeche, in eastern Chad, offers a curious sight: Sandwiched between the mud huts that most people call home and the compounds belonging to international aid workers is a humble Chinese restaurant catering to Chad's growing population of Chinese engineers and managers. Significantly, no equivalent American-style restaurant is to be found.

The same holds true across the resource-rich, institution-poor developing world, in countries as remote as East Timor and as dangerous as Somalia. While much of the military establishment in Washington continues to plan for a possible conventional war with China, Beijing is studiously avoiding a direct confrontation, instead expanding its influence through means other than traditional warfare. Principal among them is the deployment of Chinese technocrats abroad on profit-seeking missions for the world's third-largest economy.

A series of events in Washington in March and April highlighted the ways in which the U.S. is struggling to come to terms with a rising China, whose greatest strength -- even during a global recession -- is not military, but rather economic in nature. Therein, too, lies its greatest threat to U.S. interests.

Two weeks ago, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced a series of military reforms meant, in part, to prepare the U.S. for asymmetric threats, including economic warfare. Supporting these reforms, the Pentagon hosted a war game in March to test how Beijing might use its financial clout as a weapon by leveraging its global investments and huge portfolio of U.S. debt to destabilize the American economy. The exercise coincided with the release of the Defense Department's controversial annual report on old-fashioned Chinese military power: its ships, tanks, airplanes and missiles.

The report stated that the U.S. "welcomes the rise of a stable, peaceful, and prosperous China," but also emphasized Washington's concerns over China's rapidly modernizing and expanding military, and how it might be used. Those concerns have been echoed across the military-industrial-media complex.

In March, Rebecca Grant, a defense industry consultant, argued in her syndicated newspaper column that the U.S. must continue to buy F-22 fighters -- the most expensive tactical aircraft ever built at $150 million per plane -- in order to counter increasingly sophisticated mobile Chinese missile launchers as well as new Chinese jets that are a "near-even match with current U.S. fighters."

The rumored existence of these sophisticated next-generation Chinese missiles has largely driven recent overhauls of the Navy's shipbuilding plans, including the cancellation -- after more than $10 billion in research -- of a $5 billion destroyer perceived to be particularly vulnerable to such missiles, and plans to add more anti-missile defenses to defend existing ships against them.

The shifts reveal a military culture largely fixated on a perceived conventional military threat from China. But this threat is grossly exaggerated, even according to some of the Pentagon's own experts. "China's ability to sustain military power at a distance remains limited," the DOD's 2009 China report states, adding that Beijing's forces remain tailored for "anti-access," or defensive, missions.

In Africa, for instance, China "has limited military presence besides the assignment of personnel to U.N. peacekeeping operations, occasional training and exchange programs and the assignment of defense attachés to Chinese embassies," the Washington, D.C.-based Jamestown Foundation reported earlier this month. "China rarely sends its naval ships to African ports; its last naval visit took place in 2002." The Pentagon, by contrast, has 2,000 soldiers deployed on combat operations in Africa, in addition to warplanes and several warships.

Instead of challenging U.S. military dominance on the continent, Beijing has long focused on forging economic ties. "China's investment in Africa is rising sharply, and Beijing boasts a proactive record on aid and debt relief, having given more than $5.5 billion in assistance and canceled the debt of 31 countries," Japanese Africa analyst Hisane Masaki wrote this month in the trade journal Japan Focus. Meanwhile, the growth rate for Chinese investment in Africa has far exceeded the growth rate for U.S. investment, leaving the two countries' two-way trade in Africa roughly equal today, despite the U.S. having a much larger economy.

"China's approach to securing minerals in Africa has been to sign agreements to build huge projects in exchange for minerals," the New York Times reported in March. As one example, "China won oil interests off the coast of Angola after wooing that African country with a . . . $2 billion credit line," Masaki wrote in his report.

China also seems to favor African countries that many American businesses find too dangerous. In 2007 alone, Chinese civilian technical teams came under attack by rebels and insurgents in Nigeria, Ethiopia and Sudan -- all countries where few Western nationals operate. The same year, death threats from Islamists drove Chinese engineers in Somalia to briefly seek refuge in a heavily guarded hotel. Not until this year, with the deep global recession, did Beijing balk at potentially dangerous projects in Congo and Guinea.

Still, the daring investments of previous years have helped feed China's growing appetite for imported energy resources, and given Beijing the diplomatic heft to cut off energy supplies to its main symbolic rival, Taiwan. In 2006, oil-rich Chad ended formal ties with Taiwan "under pressure from Beijing," Masaki recalled. It was this kind of maneuver that the Pentagon's March war game tried to model.

That's not to say Beijing's economic strategy is always successful, whether in Africa or elsewhere. The world recession has caused some marginal investments in Africa to turn sour, particularly in Guinea. And in Asia, Chinese attempts to gain a foothold in East Timor's expanding energy sector have "made little headway," Jamestown reported in March -- despite Beijing investing millions of dollars in infrastructure in the capital of Dili, establishing scholarship programs for Timorese students and even deploying teams of doctors to deliver free medical care. Surely to Washington's relief, Dili has preferred to collaborate with Western governments to exploit its oil and gas reserves.

Still, Beijing's successes outnumber its failures. In light of this, Defense Secretary Gates is fighting to reorganize the U.S. security apparatus to reflect, among other things, China's economic strategy. In early April, he announced deep cuts to traditional military hardware, and a shift in funding towards cyber security, assistance to allies and "soft power" approaches. Among these are nontraditional measures relying heavily on partnerships with the State Department, private industry and the nonprofit sector -- in many ways mirroring the way that China's security rides on the backs of its engineers and state-owned companies.

To meet rising challenges, including that posed by China, Gates' Pentagon "supports institutionalizing whole-of-government approaches to addressing national security challenges," according to the January Role and Missions Review Report.

But Anthony Cordesman, from the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said in an April statement that Gates' announced reforms don't go far enough towards achieving this "comprehensive" approach. Furthermore, old-fashioned firepower is still favored over economic measures as a means of advancing U.S. interests by the individual military services, powerful industrial lobbies and many members of Congress.

As long as that is the case, China will continue to outmaneuver the U.S. on the economic battlefield.
 

Schumacher

Senior Member
From copper to oil to global talents, China is working full time to diversify its 'paper' to some real assets.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

16.04.2009
China, Kazakhstan Ink $10 bln Loan for Oil

Eugene Tang, Bloomberg

China, the world’s second-biggest energy consumer, will lend $10 billion to Kazakhstan in return for a stake in an oil producer in the Central Asian country.

China National Petroleum Corp. and KazMunaiGaz National Co. will buy AO Mangistaumunaigas, according to one of 11 agreements that were signed in the presence of President Hu Jintao and his Kazakhstan counterpart Nursultan Nazarbayev in Beijing today. The $10 billion aid comprises a $5 billion loan from the Export- Import Bank of China to the Development Bank of Kazakhstan and another $5 billion from China National to KazMunaiGaz.
..................

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China fishing in pool of global talent
By Wang Zhuoqiong (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-04-16 07:45

When Ding Hong quit his post as a physics professor at Boston College last summer to return to work in China, it caused quite a stir among his peers. And after 18 years living in the United States, he said even he was surprised by his decision.

China fishing in pool of global talent

"Most of the faculty were shocked," he told China Daily. "People thought staying in the US was good for my career. But I wanted to contribute to basic science research going on in China."

The 40-year-old academic is among the first batch of top-class minds lured to China as part of its 1,000-Talents Scheme, launched to help with the nation's transition from a manufacturing hub to a world leader in innovation.

Ding is now the principal investigator on two major projects at the institute of physics for the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) in Beijing. He said: "The beam line projects I am working on now will be top quality and are ahead of the US by at least two years. China can now compete for the world's top talents, the government has offered tremendous support."

The package to lure workers includes a 1-million-yuan ($147,000) relocation allowance, while the implementation of unprecedented policies meansforeign experts receive the same treatment as natural citizens. Projects are also given sufficient funding and talents are able to spend as little as six months in China, explained Ding.

"The package must be very attractive if they want to convince an established scientist or researcher to give up their tenure," he added. "But the policies to provide international schools for their children have been very practical."

Miao Hong, with the bureau of personnel and education at the CAS, said the scheme had made a massive impact on Chinese academics working abroad, adding: "People used to say no to us but now that is changing."

Talents have been attracted by China's fast-developing economy and the central government's recognition of the increasing importance of science and innovation, he said. "There is a difference between China and the US in the mindset over scientific development; China is accelerating, the US is slowing down," Ding said.

Miao continued: "The people we have targeted are those in the top five or top 10 in the world in their field. Many have already reached their career peak, all that is left for them is to think how best to fulfill their potential in work and in life. For many Chinese living overseas, it comes down to the contribution they can make to their home country. That is a major reason for them to return."

But switching jobs not only has a knock-on effect to their career, but also an expert's lifestyle.

Zhou Xingjiang decided to return to China four years ago to take up a post at the CAS institute of physics. Previously he had been a faculty member at Stanford University in California with a large house and three cars.

"Life was fine in the US but it wasn't enough," the 43-year-old physicist told China Daily, explaining he was driven by the dream of spreading his wings and running his own laboratory, and had also been dismayed at the reductions in funding for scientific research in the US during the George W. Bush administration.

Following his return to China, he has gone on to invent the world's top angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy equipment - used in the study of energy levels of atomic core electrons - something he feels he would have been unable to accomplish if he had stayed in the US.

Miao Hong added: "It is very hard for academics and their families to make the decision to come to China. But scientists pay less attention to material needs and more to career development and their family's happiness."

For Sun Mu, deputy director at the CAS institute, the government's recruitment scheme has been a success, proving an effective and practical weapon for employers.

"Our institute has very limited resources to attract new talent, but now the national policies have paved the way for employers to hire people in the areas they need most," he said.

The academy, one of the ministry-level agencies involved in the program, has already received applications from more than 80 leading minds plying their trade overseas for the second round of recruitment.

And as more talents head to China to improve their career opportunities amid the global financial slowdown, the bar has been raised, said Mu. "We have a larger pool of intelligence to choose from now. We want only the best."

Timing has also played a major part in facilitating the country's recruitment plan. Since the opening up and reforms policy in 1978, millions of Chinese students have flocked overseas for further education.

Three decades later, the number of Chinese-born talents living in Europe and the US has swelled to such a level the government has a massive pool to draw from and reverse the brain drain effect.

"The people who went abroad back then are now in their 40s or 50s and in the prime of their careers," said Miao. "It is only in recent years we have had such a large number of already experienced scientists and researchers to target and lure back."

In switching to an innovation-based economy, while all the time reducing its reliance on the export industry, China must compete with the world's most advanced nations by attracting more of the world's most advanced minds, said Miao.

Injecting extra world-class talent into its science and technology research would be a shortcut to success, she said, with the added bonus their international experience and shared practices would also help nurture young brilliant minds.

China's leaders have made filling the country's pool of talent a priority in recent years in a bid to reverse its long-term lack of sufficient input in science and innovation and to tap potentially unexplored fields, she said.

And they have not been alone. United Nations statistics show that by the end of 2006, around 30 countries had revamped their immigration policies to attract the world's leading minds, 17 of which were developed countries.

"The competition for human resources has always existed. But China didn't have much chance previously," added Miao.

High salaries and sufficient funding are necessary for attracting the overseas elite, but some still doubt whether professors will make the jump.

"I hope the plan can attract truly world-class talent to China," said Wen Xiaogang, a professor from the department of physics of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US. "In my opinion, China should attract those who can set up a world-class research group or lab in China and generate world-class research in the next 10 years."

To find out who fits that bill, however, Wen added recommendation letters from the leaders of each field were very important.
 

Rising China

Junior Member
:cool:;);)

East Asia playing bigger role in global economy, Bush says

Source: Xinhua | 04-19-2009 08:08

Special Report: Boao Forum for Asia 2009

BOAO, Hainan, April 18 (Xinhua) -- Former U.S. President George. W. Bush said Saturday that East Asia is playing a bigger role in global economy, and the world economic center has moved from Atlantic to Asia Pacific.

The Asia Pacific takes up 55 percent of the global economy, and it is of vital interest to stay "heavily engaged" with the countries in the region, he said at a banquet speech held during the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA) annual conference 2009.

"That's why I have never missed a single APEC meeting when I was in office, because I know how important it is to the prosperity," he said.

"The global financial system does need reform, needs greater transparency," he noted.

"Accessible banking standard is needed to be in place to prevent over leverage. A better warning system is needed to be put into place to anticipate crisis," he said.

He said that 20 years ago, a meeting of G7 or G8 was enough to sort out the problems, since they comprised a large share of the global economy. But now they are no longer significantly large, so such a meeting has to expand to 20, said Bush.

"We learn lessons from the past that we are intervened in close coordination with each other," he said.

As the 43rd U.S. president, Bush spoke out the fact that he had maintained good personal relations with China. He said making friends with Chinese leaders made it easier to do diplomacy.

He said changes in China are marvelous, and to have discussions without China sitting at the table makes no sense.

He stressed the world must resist isolation and protectionism, and must resist the temptation to over-correct.

"More we interact, more quickly we can succeed," he said.

In mid-March, Bush gave his first speech after leaving office in Calgary of Canada, which stirred up a protest of 200 people and shoe throwing outside the event, according to media reports.
 

pla101prc

Senior Member
"The people who went abroad back then are now in their 40s or 50s and in the prime of their careers," said Miao. "It is only in recent years we have had such a large number of already experienced scientists and researchers to target and lure back."

In switching to an innovation-based economy, while all the time reducing its reliance on the export industry, China must compete with the world's most advanced nations by attracting more of the world's most advanced minds, said Miao.

Injecting extra world-class talent into its science and technology research would be a shortcut to success, she said, with the added bonus their international experience and shared practices would also help nurture young brilliant minds.

China's leaders have made filling the country's pool of talent a priority in recent years in a bid to reverse its long-term lack of sufficient input in science and innovation and to tap potentially unexplored fields, she said.

And they have not been alone. United Nations statistics show that by the end of 2006, around 30 countries had revamped their immigration policies to attract the world's leading minds, 17 of which were developed countries.

"The competition for human resources has always existed. But China didn't have much chance previously," added Miao.

High salaries and sufficient funding are necessary for attracting the overseas elite, but some still doubt whether professors will make the jump.

"I hope the plan can attract truly world-class talent to China," said Wen Xiaogang, a professor from the department of physics of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the US. "In my opinion, China should attract those who can set up a world-class research group or lab in China and generate world-class research in the next 10 years."

To find out who fits that bill, however, Wen added recommendation letters from the leaders of each field were very important.

interesting, i heard that China has this plan to attract a couple of thousand of highly qualified talents abroad by offering one million RMB per year on top of what their salary might be.
 
Top