Chinese Economics Thread

fishrubber99

New Member
Registered Member
I wouldn't put too much stock behind anything Rhodium Group puts out, since they claimed China's GDP growth for 2024 was actually 2.4% (by basically cherry picking data series that looked bad and ignoring data series which looked good). Non-tax revenue actually increased in 2024 rather substantially, by 25%, so I don't know where they got the data which shows a drop:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Ultimately the main issue with China's fiscal revenue is that local governments are cash strapped while the central government collects a disproportionately large amount of the revenue compared to their expenditure, rebalancing this is the more pressing issue (which was already a topic of discussion during the third plenum last year).
 

Wrought

Junior Member
Registered Member
Results defeat ideology, always have and always will. As they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

The United States and others are imitating China in large part because China succeeded in a way that was unexpected. Its success in electric vehicles and clean technology did not come from liberalizing economic policies but from state interventions in the market in the name of nationalist objectives. Whether or not the United States can compete with China on China’s playing field, it is important to recognize a fundamental truth: the United States is now operating largely in accordance with Beijing’s standards, with a new economic model characterized by protectionism, constraints on foreign investment, subsidies, and industrial policy—essentially nationalist state capitalism. In the war over who gets to define the rules of the road, the battle is over, at least for now. And China won.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

drowingfish

Senior Member
Registered Member
Results defeat ideology, always have and always will. As they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I think the danger to this is that the US perceives China in a certain way and it may not truly appreciate the underlying factors to China's success, and it certainly is in no position to completely adopt the "China model".

"protectionism, constraints on foreign investment" are categorically NOT a part of the China model, the US is learning the wrong lesson here if what the article says is true. ironically the US spent so much time slandering China that it has fallen for its own lies, and now they could be punished for it.
 

GulfLander

Captain
Registered Member
Results defeat ideology, always have and always will. As they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
"Nationalist objectives"? Why use "nationalist" adjectiv tho? Isnt it more pf national sec, towards for energy self reliance thing? Shouldnt really affect other countries much really. (Unlike the chip export ban policies or the fees for CN built ships?)

Accdg to google: nationalist mean "a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
supports its interests, especially to the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
or
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
of the interests of other nations."
 

Wrought

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think the danger to this is that the US perceives China in a certain way and it may not truly appreciate the underlying factors to China's success, and it certainly is in no position to completely adopt the "China model".

"protectionism, constraints on foreign investment" are categorically NOT a part of the China model, the US is learning the wrong lesson here if what the article says is true. ironically the US spent so much time slandering China that it has fallen for its own lies, and now they could be punished for it.

They categorically are, and Beijing makes no secret of it. Such measures are gradually removed as domestic industries mature.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

And the US is simply relearning its own lesson here. The lesson that the optimal model for leaders and laggards is different.

From the nation's earliest days, Congress has struggled with the fundamental issue of the national government's proper role in fostering economic development.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
's "American System," devised in the burst of nationalism that followed the War of 1812, remains one of the most historically significant examples of a government-sponsored program to harmonize and balance the nation's agriculture, commerce, and industry. This "System" consisted of three mutually reinforcing parts: a tariff to protect and promote American industry; a national bank to foster commerce; and federal subsidies for roads, canals, and other "internal improvements" to develop profitable markets for agriculture. Funds for these subsidies would be obtained from tariffs and sales of public lands. Clay argued that a vigorously maintained system of sectional economic interdependence would eliminate the chance of renewed subservience to the free-trade, laissez-faire "British System."

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top