Chinese Economics Thread

Umut

New Member
Registered Member
Why does Latin America have twice the size of the total GDP of Africa, despite being 2 times less populous continent for example?

Why is India 20 times weaker than China, on average, in various national metrics, despite them both having around 1.4 billion populations?

Quality of population is all that matters for the future world when slowly only some STEM-related jobs remain and AI takes everything else.
Why was China so far behind the westerners in the 1980s? It's about making that late breakthrough but I mean, it's a different issue. I don't think India will even reach half of China's average income, but if Chinese birth rates continue to fall like this and are not stopped at some point, sooner or later they will definitely pass as total nominal GDP.
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why was China so far behind the westerners in the 1980s? It's about making that late breakthrough but I mean, it's a different issue. I don't think India will even reach half of China's average income, but if Chinese birth rates continue to fall like this and are not stopped at some point, sooner or later they will definitely pass as total nominal GDP.


That's elementary questions, it's because the Westerners had 500 years of colonialism before that point. It's already a miracle that China managed to catch and surpass them nearly in all metrics so fast (in a fraction of that time).

Imagine if China was the one who turned to colonization at that time during the Ming Dynasty with its superior fleet both in terms of its sheer size and technology, already documented routes, etc, the West would not be a fraction of what it is today.

I always looked at the Western rise (to today's proportions) more so as being on the "lucky" side of things, and the Chinese rise more so on the "skill" side, due to how many times it rose after falling in the past and it is the civilization with the highest continuity in the history of the world.

It's also good logic because, before colonialism, the only Western block able to rival them like today, in their 5000 years long history, was the Roman Empire at its height, that's not even 10%.

Second, nominal GDP is a 100% worthless garbage metric and that will every serious economist tell you quickly if you ask him that.
 
Last edited:

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
However, China is a socialist country, so I don't think that they will even raise the retirement age, they will probably pay it from its budget if the pension funds stop being self-sufficient (I think they maybe already aren't, but we see no problems in debt levels).
It needs to happen. The life expectancy is rising too much for that to be a valid strategy. Russia already rose their retirement age. There were a lot of protests but the government managed to push it through.
 

donjasjit

New Member
Registered Member
China has one big advantage.

Rich industrialized countries like Japan, Korea and Italy are undergoing rapid demographic decline even faster than China. China has the opportunity to study these countries and see what happens to their economies in the next few decades.

It can then calibrate what measures it needs to take. It still has time.

The demographic problem will only become evident after 2050. China still has a couple of decades.
 

Staedler

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why was China so far behind the westerners in the 1980s? It's about making that late breakthrough but I mean, it's a different issue. I don't think India will even reach half of China's average income, but if Chinese birth rates continue to fall like this and are not stopped at some point, sooner or later they will definitely pass as total nominal GDP.
India will soon be a land of regular 40+ C temperatures. The Indian monsoon is also increasingly disrupted and shortened. They won't make it.
 

Serb

Junior Member
Registered Member
China has one big advantage.

Rich industrialized countries like Japan, Korea and Italy are undergoing rapid demographic decline even faster than China. China has the opportunity to study these countries and see what happens to their economies in the next few decades.

It can then calibrate what measures it needs to take. It still has time.

The demographic problem will only become evident after 2050. China still has a couple of decades.

That's the gist of my problem with the Western propaganda regarding the "demographic collapse" in China. I'm not denying that it is a problem, but it's probably 10 times less of a problem than they present it as (same as real estate and stagnation "collapses" haha).

But the elites and intelligence agencies who control media have to lie about everything for their fragile societies not to implode (especially regarding how "bad" their rivals are having it), even if their points are pure stupidity because their populations are also quite brainwashed to buy it.

But, because they have to lie, we don't have to lie here. We should present it as to what it is. I mean just look at this thread, the last few posts, and how many counterpoints (or countermeasures) we pointed out against that "demographic collapse theory". I could count at least 5. So, their rhetoric should be thrown in the garbage.
 
Last edited:

resistance

Junior Member
Registered Member
Haha you are dead wrong about people having less jobs than before. There will always be jobs that require more adaptibility, finesse, sophistication that an AI can never have. If AI and robotics leads to more prosperity, then it will also lead to people having more money. How will they use this money? For more services that makes their lives easier or induges them. So, more entertainers, more sophisticated service, more prostitutes, more massage providers, the situations are endless. People with money will even hire servants just to make life even easier. AI can never do those things.

When people were poor and just worked in the fields, A job like Sommelier didn't exist, whose only job is to recommend people what wine to drink. But now its a very lucrative job. The more money people have, more types of specialized job will appear, that only humans can do. There will never be less jobs.
Which job that need to employ people as much as the job that AI gonna disrupt?

Of course there will be more specialize job but It won't employs people as much as the job that get disrupted.
 

resistance

Junior Member
Registered Member
Do you think AI replacing people favors China? And if so, why? Because I don’t. Automation favors those countries that control the most limited natural resources. That would be the West and Russia due to their long centuries of colonialism. Robot factories are best built where the mining operations are.

It China is to overtake the West it must come from either a demographic victory from having solved the fertility problems no other developed country has solved. Or from a technological victory where China gains a significant technological edge and uses it to dominate the world. Otherwise long term it will be a loss due to the West’s superior hold over global natural resources and better demographics.

The time to win is now, not later.
What china have is good infrastructure, cheap energy and pools of STEM grads which make china a technological manufacturing hub.
Demographics will gradually better as people having better quality of life.
 

donjasjit

New Member
Registered Member
What china have is good infrastructure, cheap energy and pools of STEM grads which make china a technological manufacturing hub.
Demographics will gradually better as people having better quality of life.
Not necessarily, Japan and Korea are good examples. Their demographic declines are steeper. Since, China has so much ethnic similarity with them, it is likely China will follow the same demographic course as them unless decisive action is taken.
 

henrik

Senior Member
Registered Member
China has one big advantage.

Rich industrialized countries like Japan, Korea and Italy are undergoing rapid demographic decline even faster than China. China has the opportunity to study these countries and see what happens to their economies in the next few decades.

It can then calibrate what measures it needs to take. It still has time.

The demographic problem will only become evident after 2050. China still has a couple of decades.

Korea is not even a rich industrialized country. Korea is just a bragging country without any fundamental technology.
 
Top