Chinese Economics Thread

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member

DJI's latest UAV AVATA new technology analysis and detailed evaluation of advantages and disadvantages​

DJI has released its long-awaited new drone, the AVATA, and the industry is raving about it: it’s an immersive drone that you can forget to control without learning. The actual experience is also true. This article will carry out technical analysis and objective evaluation of AVATA from the perspective of enthusiasts. First, we analyze what new technologies AVATA uses from a technical point of view, and then explore its advantages and disadvantages from the experience and performance parameters.
DJI has released its long-awaited new drone, the A VATA , and the industry is raving about it: it’s an immersive drone that you can forget to control without learning. The actual experience is also true. This article will carry out technical analysis and objective evaluation of A VATA from the perspective of enthusiasts. First, we analyze what new technology A VATA uses from a technical point of view, and then explore its advantages and disadvantages from the experience and performance parameters.
In general, AVATA uses the AR/VR technology developed by DJI , making flying no longer a prohibitive thing for many users . Feel free to swim. The fly in the ointment is: A VATA has not broken through the inherent framework and constraints of DJI, and is only an entry-level consumer high-end toy. The battery life is still a pain point, the flight speed is not fast enough, and the lack of an obstacle avoidance system is its biggest regret. For more advantages and disadvantages, please see the detailed analysis and evaluation.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Of course there is a practical value to aggregating countries that will do whatever the US wants. If the US tells the Netherlands not to allow ASML to ship lithography machines to China, what do you think it is going to do? If it tells France and Italy not to use Huawei 5G, what will they do? If the US tells Canada to arrest Meng Wanzhou, what do you think Canada will do?

I think we know the answer to that. They will listen to their masters. They always have. Nothing has changed since the days of the Eight-Nation Alliance. Only now it's the 33-nation alliance (NATO + Japan + Australia + India)

The US is an empire, not a nation state. When you go against the US, you go against the entire empire.


"1 on 1" comparison is meaningless.

You have to get over it, and get onto the next question.

That is obviously, what is the result of all of this bossing around?

As far as China is concerned, this has not amounted to a hill of beans.

If they want to really fight, then fight!

However, this fight, the tech war, has turned out to be not much of a fight.

China builds it 5G network on schedule, with Huawei equipment playing the central role. No one on earth has done the same.

China semiconductor industry is booming, with rapid advancement in advanced nodes, and domestic substitution of foreign IC equipment being accelerated. Then the kicker is that they are gunning for the very top with their EUV research.

If the West is speaking with one voice in regards to China pertaining to the tech war, clearly it is not working.

We do not even have to look at the China, just look at Russia. The West speaks and actually acts practically all in unison against Putin.

The result is Western Europe faces its most dire crisis in decades.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
You have to get over it, and get onto the next question.

That is obviously, what is the result of all of this bossing around?

As far as China is concerned, this has not amounted to a hill of beans.

If they want to really fight, then fight!

However, this fight, the tech war, has turned out to be not much of a fight.

China builds it 5G network on schedule, with Huawei equipment playing the central role. No one on earth has done the same.

China semiconductor industry is booming, with rapid advancement in advanced nodes, and domestic substitution of foreign IC equipment being accelerated. Then the kicker is that they are gunning for the very top with their EUV research.

If the West is speaking with one voice in regards to China pertaining to the tech war, clearly it is not working.

We do not even have to look at the China, just look at Russia. The West speaks and actually acts practically all in unison against Putin.

The result is Western Europe faces its most dire crisis in decades.
Bro There is a certain degree of acceptance and grudging admiration as all restriction had failed. And it seems that SMIC is confident to produce its 7nm N+2 without care or fear from the US, they have escape the gauntlet with support from both ASML and the Chinese gov't.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Of course there is a practical value to aggregating countries that will do whatever the US wants. If the US tells the Netherlands not to allow ASML to ship lithography machines to China, what do you think it is going to do? If it tells France and Italy not to use Huawei 5G, what will they do? If the US tells Canada to arrest Meng Wanzhou, what do you think Canada will do?

I think we know the answer to that. They will listen to their masters. They always have. Nothing has changed since the days of the Eight-Nation Alliance. Only now it's the 33-nation alliance (NATO + Japan + Australia + India)

The US is an empire, not a nation state. When you go against the US, you go against the entire empire.


"1 on 1" comparison is meaningless.
The US is a paper empire. When it can't compete or fight China all by itself even with its half effort "allies" than they can't fight anyone period. Look at Korea, Vietnam, and the Middle East nations. Why do you think the US Army and many other branches are having a difficult time meeting their recruitment goals this year? Because the American people are getting tired of wars fighting 3rd world countries that not only drain the treasures but the morale as well after a lost.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

In addition to the economy and Covid, the sharp drop in entry-level troops can be traced to young people’s concerns about the physical and psychological risks of service, as well as other career interests, the possibility of interference with college education, and dislike of military lifestyle, according to a DoD youth poll from last summer featured in the slides. The briefing also cites declining trust in the military as an institution, along with the military’s high standard for recruits.


“At a time when the Department is struggling to recruit qualified young men and women fit for duty to fill the ranks, and while China is embarking on a massive military buildup which threatens American interests around the world, we should not be hindering our own readiness and capabilities by punishing and forcing out experienced and dedicated Guardsmen and Reservists,” the letter stated.
 

horse

Colonel
Registered Member
Bro There is a certain degree of acceptance and grudging admiration as all restriction had failed. And it seems that SMIC is confident to produce its 7nm N+2 without care or fear from the US, they have escape the gauntlet with support from both ASML and the Chinese gov't.

The Americans by in large are narcissists.

They have an overextended opinion about themselves.

That gets them into trouble, and impossible situations.

With the tech war, that means they cannot go forward or backwards.

Just like the trade war, where they cannot increase tariffs due to self-harm, and they cannot remove tariffs due to political reasons.
 
Last edited:

Biscuits

Major
Registered Member
Of course there is a practical value to aggregating countries that will do whatever the US wants. If the US tells the Netherlands not to allow ASML to ship lithography machines to China, what do you think it is going to do? If it tells France and Italy not to use Huawei 5G, what will they do? If the US tells Canada to arrest Meng Wanzhou, what do you think Canada will do?

I think we know the answer to that. They will listen to their masters. They always have. Nothing has changed since the days of the Eight-Nation Alliance. Only now it's the 33-nation alliance (NATO + Japan + Australia + India)

The US is an empire, not a nation state. When you go against the US, you go against the entire empire.


"1 on 1" comparison is meaningless.
Yeah and 1 Russia from China's side puts the whole EU into recession and energy shortage. That's like most of those 25 nations gone lol.

India is neutral, their military pretty much only runs because Russia lets it do so.

The real strength of economy is not in gdp, it is in control over resources and industry. When crisis hits, whoever can keep prices down on critical goods and public services will be the winner.

It matters nothing that EU + US and Japan have a larger gdp than Russia and China, what matters is which bloc can create more and better goods.

The flaw behind intimidating small nations to do your bidding in a flock is that they're inherently flaky compared to real allies bound on shared principles, equality and goals.

Even if EU claims they will starve to save USA, do you think the EU citizens will not cause any unrest once pressure mounts?

Having secured both a larger economy and more importantly a much larger real economy, China only needs to gradually put the squeeze on America, dragging them into proxy wars like Ukraine to keep their inflation high and wages stagnant, slowly but surely causing domestic unrest. And this so called 25 nation empire of USA will meet the same fate as the 15 nation empire of USSR.
 
Top