In general, this incident was caused by a serious crisis of trust.Two puzzling "mistakes" in a row have greatly triggered panic.The previous abuse of health codes has caused terrible consequences.Just imagine if the central government didn't outlaw crypto nonsense in China, the howlings and the screaming from some greedy idiots in China would have been worse. And yet, there was some persistent and lamentable comments that were made against the government rule expressing strong disagreement saying that the government rules were too suffocating for not allowing citizens the space to operate and "invest" blah blah...and the result so far has been catastrophic in the west, especially for the many folks that has been convinced to invest all their money in that scheme. @zhangjim you ought to be more restrained, introspective with your comments and not react so emotionally clouding your judgment by treating or looking at the government in the worst possible light. I do not deny that the government could have handled this issue differently but that's a far different matter to inferring some sort of meltdown that their action is a step away from deploying tanks against the people. You're quite susceptible and impressionable enough to be recruited by the NED types, Foreign intelligence operators because what you expressed, your mindset, you're disillusionment from the system, mistrust of the government, not to mention you're naivety and well intentioned care for your like minded Chinese are some of the components/traits and hallmarks perfect as their candidate.
You will find that this financial crime with a wide range of influence has made things more serious and difficult to deal with under the consistent operation of the local government to prevent petitions
Due to historical lessons and the characteristics of "people's power", such law enforcement means need to be used with caution.If it is not an extremely serious act of violence, the act of dispersing the people is usually not taken.That's the theory, at least.
From the result, this is definitely a failed crisis management method:
1、The act of blocking the news completely failed, and all foreign media were reporting the matter, while the domestic media had no news - although everyone learned about the incident through Weibo.
2、Exacerbate the rift between the people and the government.I'm not the only one who is disappointed.More serious violent conflicts were not uncommon in the past,the consequences of the government's unwillingness to clarify social hot spots are often very serious(although not comparable with the United States).
In Weng'an, Guizhou Province, the protester was beaten, which eventually led to large-scale violence, and the government building was burned.
Some people worry that there will be more large-scale protests and conflicts on July 20(Zhengzhou rain disaster Memorial Day)in the future.Maybe the government is already on the alert.
Honestly, if you find that the crisis communications tactics used by the government have not improved significantly in the intervening decade or so, and still exacerbate things into violent conflict, disappointment is inevitable.