manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Other countries trade with you for their own benefit, not because they wanna help out a nice guy like you. That's why India can gurgle democratic scrotum but companies all over the world still prefer China by a long mile.Economic success and technological superiority depends on trade, gaining markets, and cooperation in R&D and sharing of technology. The willingness of other countries to trade with you, open their markets to you and to cooperate in R&D and share technology with you depends on soft power. This is especially true for China which still lags in many technology areas, and is still a middle income country, not yet a high income country. And it will take decades to become high income. Therefore, it needs more soft power to ease its path.
The United States even though by your standards has the most hard power in the world, they still try to cultivate their soft power via Hollywood movies, propaganda, talk of 'human rights' and democracy, so on. This is in fact very successful and it even brainwashes many Chinese people in Hong Kong and Taiwan. They go around rioting and waving US flags. You don't see people in Hawaii rioting and waving PRC flags. Because the PRC lags in soft power, and this is a weakness.
What America does is what is naturally done in every country, but its effects are more prominent because America has greater hard power. People in Hong Kong and Taiwan are obviously not comparable to those in Hawaii. One is brainwashed by a rabid Western democracy and the other hates the CCP because it was beaten in a war where it thought it had as a slam dunk due to American technology. If Hawaii was under the CCP for 50 years, we'll see what happens.
Everything I say is true and everything you say is not. It's a rule here. You're grasping at straws. Those are political figures in their own countries. Some of those people aren't even successful but just famous for their approach, oftentimes post-mortem when the issue is already over. Individual people don't have hard power. I said stage figuratively so you literally imagined people talking on a stage. What a facepalm moment. This comparison is nonsense just like all of your posts.Not true, many people like Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, etc. have very little hard power but lots of soft power and achieved major revolutions. Soft power is completely independent of hard power, it's about propaganda and making people believe you are on the side of justice.
PS. Getting kinda bold talking to me directly cus you've got 2 little buddies around, eh? Sorry, not enough; I'll debate you all under the table while signing out medical reports on the other window LOLOL
Is wrong just like your posts but better written.THIS!!!!!!
Last edited: