春节前夕,两架AG600M分别从珠海和宜昌成功转场至西安阎良。今年,AG600将围绕“年中具备执行灭火任务能力,完成40%表明符合性试飞”目标,并行开展典型任务场景试飞、铁鸟试验、试验室验证试验和静力机研发试验、验证试验、适航验证试等试验试飞任务,确保明年底取得型号合格证...
I think it’s massive because the applications are limited only by innovation. the political ramifications are just as big.I'd be interested to know how big a market there is for AG600M, both in China and worldwide.
It is a very small market, and most of the aircraft are expected to be used for forest fire fighting instead of passenger airliners.I'd be interested to know how big a market there is for AG600M, both in China and worldwide.
I this might be one of the few ways to transport large objects or people to a remote island quickly and then retrieve them. That's got to be useful for something...I'd be interested to know how big a market there is for AG600M, both in China and worldwide.
It's a useful aircraft for supporting China's military bases in the South China Sea. Could it also have a CSAR role similar to Japan's US-2?It is a very small market, and most of the aircraft are expected to be used for forest fire fighting instead of passenger airliners.
Currently, significant modern large amphibians in service are
1. Beriev Be-200 reported at 17 aircraft sold since 1998.
2. Bombardier CL-415, around 95 aircraft sold since 1993.
Being a very specialised aircraft, AG600M would be very difficult to compete with other land based passenger airliners in term of cost of operations and maintenance. And in island hopping flights, smaller (10 to 20 seaters) planes are preferred, such as Beaver float plane.
However, it should excel in forest fire fighting. If AG600 can sell beyond 100 aircraft in civilian market, it would be a great achievement, considering that the best seller (for aircraft built after 1990s) Bombardier CL-415 sold less than 100 planes in 30 years.
Yes, AVIC said CSAR is also AG600's role. Most of the orders will be for CSAR and firefighting.It's a useful aircraft for supporting China's military bases in the South China Sea. Could it also have a CSAR role similar to Japan's US-2?
For civil transport, AG600 has very limited application: high pax demand to fill its cabin, with open water, impossible to build an airport. That's why we only see small seaplanes nowadays. They are more flexible to operate. And as you said, twin-engined turboprops have better performance. They can take off and land with short runways, better economic performance, more comfortable for passengers.Doubt it will gain much traction as a civilian transport - execpt for limited markets that require landing on water. Twin-engined turboprops like ATR and - if it ever gets into service - the MA700 can serve regional routes far more economically.