Chinese Aviation Industry

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
According to this old new from 2015 Congo ordered 3
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


There, a deal for delivery of three Chinese-built ARJ21 planes was sealed by the Republic of Congo, also known as Congo-Brazzaville, the first African country to order the new plane.

ARJ21 is short for Advanced Regional Jet for the 21st Century, a new, twin-engine turbofan for a short- to medium-range jet. The plane is built by the Commercial Aircraft Corp of China Ltd, in which AVIC is a major shareholder.

Congo's Ministry of Transport signed a purchase agreement for three ARJ21-700 aircraft, including two regional jet models and one business aircraft.

"The ARJ21-700 is made in accordance with the international airworthiness standards, which is an aircraft with wide market adaptability and excellent range coverage capability, and is very suitable for operations in Africa," according to a Congo government official quoted by the World Civil Aviation Resource Net, wcarn.com.
 

Klon

Junior Member
Registered Member
Here are passages from a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by Cao Chunxiao, CAS academician, mostly giving the titanium and composites content of varius aircraft. It was posted months ago in the J-20 thread, but it has information about a variety of other planes. I bolded the numbers for ease of reading.

(Titanium)
Therefore, the amount of titanium alloy is constantly innovative. The special of the big airplane is two big contents, one is big luck, one is big guest, military transport plane is also big airplane special important content. The titanium content of these two aircraft is about 9% to 10%. C919 Titanium alloy dosage even and 777 equivalent, already is relatively advanced. But compared with Boeing 787 and A350, we still have a gap in the dosage of TI alloys, and they use 14% to 15%. Now Russia has been working with us at the same time to create a record of titanium content in MS21. Why does Russia use so much? Probably because the titanium alloy is its strength, the production is also big, the level also can, therefore the MS21 titanium alloy dosage ratio is 25%, this is the information introduction. It is likely that it has created the highest record of the current, and it has just flown a little later than us.

Military aircraft titanium alloy used more, the main disadvantage of titanium alloy is expensive. Civil aircraft will not necessarily use a lot of economic considerations. Titanium alloy material is used in the blade. Because of the air superiority of the war, it was used more on military aircraft. The highest record is F22, the aircraft used 41% of titanium, composite 24%, aluminum alloy only 15%, the original is mainly aluminum alloy, is now the main titanium. F35 also many, with 27% of the titanium. American bombers are also very powerful titanium, B1 bombers are 21%,b2 bombers used to 26%. The big bomber used 26% of the titanium.

Our country's civil aircraft are still moving forward. For example, ARJ21 used 4.8%, to C919 already used 9.3%.

The amount of titanium used by military fighters in our country is also increasing. We are 8 with titanium is rarely 2%, fighter 10 with titanium 4%, J 11 used to 15%, fighter 20 used to 20%, fighter 31 used to 25%, also count more. Our shipping 20 is similar to the American C-17. America's C-17 called the Global Overlord and our shipping 20 nickname called the ROC, uses the titanium quantity all is 10%. In fact, two grades are similar.

We have quite a lot of titanium on the aircraft carrier. The most advanced carrier aircraft f-18e/f in the United States is 15% of titanium, we ship aircraft fighter 15 flying shark titanium alloy dosage up to 20%.

The parts above the landing gear of the 787 are made by the United States with better and stronger titanium alloys. Our national aviation titanium alloy parts are also many, such as we use a lot of F-20 titanium forgings.

(Composites)
Here is a look at the composite materials, composite materials reign of the times, menacing. Composites have developed very quickly over the years, with composites growing and A380 25%, which is a turning point, and then to Boeing 787 with 50% composites. Boeing 787 used more composite materials, the fuel consumption reduced, and then airlines have to 787, which promoted the A350 design of the major changes in the Airbus of composite materials to 53%, more than the United States Boeing 787 use more, which shows the composite on the aircraft more and more use of the trend. Many other kinds of aircraft composite materials have leaped first.

Our national composite materials in the fighter can be used, but still need to continue to develop. We used the J-20 to 29%. Military transport Y20 is currently 8%, commercial aircraft ARJ21 1%, we C919 intend to use 12%, and continue to improve in the future.
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Via Jsch AG 600 2nd test flight
January 24, at 9:54 am
China's first large-scale amphibious aircraft
AG600 ushered in..
The first flight in 2018
This is the second test flight since the maiden flight on December 24, 2017
Only in a month interval!

49eca83dly1fnry91jqi8j20zk0np0xt.jpg

49eca83dly1fnry7rxv8cj20zk0nptch.jpg
 

Tirdent

Junior Member
Registered Member
Seems the CR929 will adopt the A350 fuselage construction approach of separate panels, rather than the 787 wound barrel.
 

Tirdent

Junior Member
Registered Member
Yes, it's not necessarily an inferior approach - I certainly didn't mean to imply that. Frankly, I'm pleasantly surprised that they're taking the leap to a composite fuselage at all.

While for a simple pressure vessel (e.g. a pressurized tank or a solid rocket motor casing) winding a single piece barrel is the best option, an airliner fuselage is more complex than that. There are lots of penetrations (doors, windows), a structural floor inside, a non-cylindrical section for the centre wing box carry-through structure and at the end of the day, the pressure differential is relatively modest. Having the opportunity to tailor skin thickness to local load-bearing requirements (rather than constant thickness all round) and integrate stiffening & mounting structures more easily saves at least some of the weight and fasteners that the panel joints entail compared to a barrel.

While the weight question is probably a dead heat, tooling cost most likely favours panels.
 
Last edited:

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
The R&D of C919 See how young are the team amazing
upload_2018-2-3_21-57-53.png

upload_2018-2-3_21-58-35.png


upload_2018-2-3_22-0-53.png

They work late at night sometime even sleeping under their desk

upload_2018-2-3_22-3-19.png

And eating at their desk too! practically living on their desk
upload_2018-2-3_22-5-18.png
 
Last edited:
Top