Chinese air to ground weapons (missiles, PGMs, etc)

Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
Any updates on this missile project?

I see this as one potential Chinese equivalent to the LRASM/JASSM of the United States, but supersonic (or even hypersonic, given the breakthrough by Chinese scientists on maintaining constant communications with vehicles travelling in the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds).
Click to expand...

Trust me, if there were an update on a high profile, potential high impact project like this, we would know.

Though now that I review that image, I feel like I've seen it before somewhere else perhaps as a US concept for a future anti ship weapon from many years ago, so there's a possibility it is just illustrative.
 
siegecrossbow

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Consecutive precision strikes by H-6K.

XU3MtP5.gif
 
Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Akame said:
What are China's JDAM equivalent munitions?
Click to expand...
siegecrossbow said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...

Er.
The more accurate answer is that the PLA doesn't currently have an equivalent to the JDAM family in service.

There are a number of munitions families offered by industry such as the FT, LS, LT families and so on, but we don't have any indication as to which one the PLA may buy if any.
 
ZeEa5KPul

ZeEa5KPul

Colonel
Registered Member
I'm going to post this here because the UAV thread isn't the place for it.
Blitzo said:
Just stop.
Speaking as a normal posting member.
Click to expand...
Well, since that isn't a moderator instruction, I'm not going to do it since I feel the need to put my 2¢ in. The idea that the PLAAF doesn't have PGM stocks commensurate with its size and technological sophistication because it doesn't plaster pictures of them everywhere doesn't hold water. We don't see them because the PLA doesn't let us see them. This isn't the old days where pictures and information leaked regularly, today the PLA does decide what outsiders get to see and don't see and they've decided that all we'll see are rocket pods.
Blitzo said:
This forum is being laughed specifically for things like this.
Click to expand...
Laughed at by whom and why does that matter?
 
Blitzo

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
ZeEa5KPul said:
I'm going to post this here because the UAV thread isn't the place for it.

Well, since that isn't a moderator instruction, I'm not going to do it since I feel the need to put my 2¢ in. The idea that the PLAAF doesn't have PGM stocks commensurate with its size and technological sophistication because it doesn't plaster pictures of them everywhere doesn't hold water. We don't see them because the PLA doesn't let us see them. This isn't the old days where pictures and information leaked regularly, today the PLA does decide what outsiders get to see and don't see and they've decided that all we'll see are rocket pods.

Laughed at by whom and why does that matter?
Click to expand...

I'm saying you should choose your battles more wisely and perhaps not contesting every single little perceived slight against the PLA would be better for this forum as a whole.


But whatever, if you still aren't able to understand what I'm talking about, feel free to continue.
 
F

Franklin

Captain
Does China have a equivalent to the Maverick missile. If not what is China using to hit things like tanks and armoured vehicles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top