Well, if we are talking about aircraft, I would say stealth bomber is the next on the wish list.
Anyway, Y-20 supposedly have two versions. The first version has a cargo ramp and unpressurized. The second version has no cargo ramp and is fully pressurized to serve as a platform for AWACs and ABLs. I wonder what version this prototype is.
Are the cabins of other transporters like Il-76, A400M and C-17 not fully pressurized? If there are two versions, I expect the cargo version to be the "standard" version used for carrying loads as well as troops, medevac, etc. Can't imagine you'd leave a hundred and something people out there unpressurized.
Although Huitong and others are saying two prototypes have been built... Maybe one is the standard cargo version (hopefully it is fully pressurized, in this day and age) and the other is the sans-ramp "special mission" airframe form which AEWC, tanker will be derived from?
Also I'm surprised why people bring up Y-20 as a candidate for the ABL. The US haven't exactly had much luck with their endeavours, and any Chinese tests will only be aboard a couple of Y-20s.
Here is my hopes for how XAC designed this plane; fully pressurized cabin as per modern specifications, large volume cargo hold (which seems to be present, going by these pictures. Check out pics of Il-76 with D-30s; D-30s on Y-20 look hilariously undersized in comparison). Further, I'd like to they had the foresight to add easy provision for an IFR probe. Best case scenario is they built Y-20 from the ground up with IFR capabilities like A400M, so any Y-20 airframe will be capable of refuelling other planes simply by adding a couple or three drogue pods and a few large tanks of fuel in the cabin area.
Such an ability to switch rapidly between IFR and standard transport for a single aircraft (of which PLAAF will have due of in the foreseeable future) will drastically increase both the strategic transport and heavy refuelling ability of the air force.