China's Space Program News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

jackliu

Banned Idiot
I wonder if the Beidou is the only one that can do that?

As far as I know yes, Beidou is the only GPS system that offer free SMS service, and in reality text message's bandwidths is really really tiny, it is almost nothing compare to voice call, so this is not a drain on resource at all.

The only reason they are charging you is pure profit for the phone company.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!



What's most amazing about the texting craze is just how inexpensive it is for mobile carriers to provide this wildly popular service. SMS messages are not only extremely short (maxing out at 160 characters), but they also cleverly exploit today's digital phone networks, leveraging transmission channels between phone and cell tower that were originally designed to coordinate voice calls. "They cost the mobile carriers so little that you could argue that they're free," says Collins.


You don't have to be a Wall Street analyst to do the quick math: with a carrier cost of one-third of a penny, when a customer pays 15 cents to send a message, 98% of that 15 cents is pure profit. (Of course, you already knew that in your gut; that's why your stomach turns every time you examine your cell-phone bill.)
 

jackliu

Banned Idiot
The race is on between the Euro Galileo and Beidou 2 to send their sats up over Europe because both share very similar frequencies. As it currently stands which ever country is first to send a signal from a satellite then that frequency "belongs" to said country.

I was under the impression that Beidao already are broadcasting on this frequency for a few years already, and the Europeans are actually kinda upset about it.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
The race is on between the Euro Galileo and Beidou 2 to send their sats up over Europe because both share very similar frequencies. As it currently stands which ever country is first to send a signal from a satellite then that frequency "belongs" to said country.

I could be wrong but i think they have both been allowed to use the same frequency to date anyway.If the frquency solely belonged to the country who used it first, why has'nt China told the E.U. to "take a hike" on the mattera long time ago.

heres an update on the dispute

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


EU, China Schedule December Meeting on Navigation Dispute

PARIS — The European Union (EU) and China have agreed to meet in December here to try and end their dispute on overlapping radio frequencies both plan to use for their future encrypted government/military satellite navigation services, according to a joint statement from both parties.

The Joint Statement on Space Technology Cooperation, which was signed as an annex to a broader EU-China summit held Sept. 20 in Brussels, says the two sides are continuing collaboration on satellite navigation despite the signal conflict, which has been a subject of debate for at least two years.

Specifically, the 27-nation EU and China have agreed to continue the China-Europe GNSS [Global Navigation Satellite System] Technology Training and Cooperation Center.

The December meeting on frequencies will be conducted under what the statement calls “the ITU Framework,” ITU being the International Telecommunication Union of Geneva, a United Nations affiliate that regulates satellite orbital slots and frequencies.

An ITU official said the 193-nation organization’s mandate does not extend to resolving issues such as that between Europe’s Galileo constellation, now in development, and China’s Beidou system. The official said that while the organization is happy to provide a forum for discussions, it can do little given that Galileo and Beidou do not interfere with each other’s operations.

Instead, the frequency issue is a problem in Europe because China’s Beidou system is designed to use for its government/military service a portion of radio spectrum that overlaps the Galileo frequencies the EU wants for its Public Regulated Service, also encrypted and reserved for government and military use. In the event either the EU or China wanted to disable the other’s secure signals in a time of conflict, it would be at risk of knocking out its own service because of the shared frequencies.

The joint EU-China statement called for strengthened collaboration on Earth observation projects and on the two sides’ space exploration goals, with a jointly organized conference on space exploration scheduled for the end of 2013.
 

lostsoul

Junior Member

My take from that article is that nothing is resolved. Just diplomatic words.

The European Union (EU) and China have agreed to meet in December here to try and end their dispute on overlapping radio frequencies both plan to use for their future encrypted government/military satellite navigation services, according to a joint statement from both parties

From the following quote:

In the event either the EU or China wanted to disable the other’s secure signals in a time of conflict, it would be at risk of knocking out its own service because of the shared frequencies.

This would put China at a big disadvantage since NATO would still have the Military GPS signals therefore it could afford to "knock out" the Beidou signals in time of conflict.

China needs to step up its deployment of Beidou sats as Galileo is starting its full launch program this year.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
My take from that article is that nothing is resolved. Just diplomatic words.



From the following quote:



This would put China at a big disadvantage since NATO would still have the Military GPS signals therefore it could afford to "knock out" the Beidou signals in time of conflict.

China needs to step up its deployment of Beidou sats as Galileo is starting its full launch program this year.


As of this time Beidou is half-way done, meanwhile Galileo only has two to three in orbit.
 

delft

Brigadier
Exactly. I was 15 years old. Watched the event on TV.. Amazing...

My pops was in the garage with his Ham radio going and a portable TV seeing how much of a delay there was between the broadcast on the TV and the Ham radio. The Ham radio broadcast was about 8-10 seconds ahead of the TV.. as I recall.

If the whole event was a hoax it would take a cover up of unbelievable measure. All of NASA and their families.A portion of the US Military. Certain privileged media members. many members of congress, the President and Vice president and much of their staff.

If it was a hoax the Soviets would have exposed because they monitored all NASA space flights as the US did the same with the Soviets. Certainly the Soviets would have spilled the beans.
In 1957 only the British were immediately able to to follow Sputnik 1. Organisatons all over the world followed, many of them non-military, as well as many thousands of amateurs. Try bribing all of them not to spill the beans about half a dozen fake NASA moon expeditions!!! :)
 

Schumacher

Senior Member
A pair of SJ9 launched to test electric propulsion, among other goodies.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China successfully launched the Practice-9 A and Practice-9 B satellites into space at 11:25 a.m. Sunday, the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center said.

The satellites, launched from the center in north China's Shanxi Province, were boosted by a Long March-2C carrier rocket and sent into a predetermined orbit.

The Practice-9 A and B are the first in a series of civilian satellites designed for technological experimentation. ................................
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
A pair of SJ9 launched to test electric propulsion, among other goodies.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China successfully launched the Practice-9 A and Practice-9 B satellites into space at 11:25 a.m. Sunday, the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center said.

The satellites, launched from the center in north China's Shanxi Province, were boosted by a Long March-2C carrier rocket and sent into a predetermined orbit.

The Practice-9 A and B are the first in a series of civilian satellites designed for technological experimentation. ................................


I wonder if Practice-9 A and Practice-9 B can be used at test dummy satellites for China's upgraded anti-satellite ballistic missiles after their initial test are done.
 

Engineer

Major
This would put China at a big disadvantage since NATO would still have the Military GPS signals therefore it could afford to "knock out" the Beidou signals in time of conflict.

China needs to step up its deployment of Beidou sats as Galileo is starting its full launch program this year.

Not so. One reason why there is a dispute on a frequency ownership is because the particular frequency is right beside the frequency used by GPS. This means when Beidou/Galileo is jammed, GPS would be affected as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top