I read China FM's statement and CCG's statement, but it's not very convincing. As a neutral observer when you see a video of the phillippines coast guard cutting the end of a floating barrier which looks exactly like the one that China deployed, the Filipino story seems more convincing.
The only way I don't see China losing in this incident is if China can show, or if observers can reasonably infer that the phillippines setup up their own barrier in an uncontested water and cut their own rope. Anything less would be a Lose in my book.
Please use your knowledge and common sense.
Firstly, in the Philippino comedy sketch, they had two guys in a tiny rowboat with a motor. Just how much range do you think such a tiny craft can have? From where would they have been able to set off to even reach the floating barrier with that range?
Secondly, the tiny anchor and rope they cut would not have kept anything remotely as large as the floating barrier in place.
It looks like a couple of guys went a few hundred metres out from shore, dropped an anchor and length of rope that they brought with them, and then filmed themselves cutting the rope. There were zero recognisable features in the footage to show where it was shot, no shots or helpless Chinese coast guards looking on clutching pearls, and not even a DJI aero shot of the defeated barrier drifting off into the sunset. If this was real, you think the Philippines would not have made sure they got all that on camera to brag about?
This is just a fictional low budget, low effort fake that could have been shot at almost any beach in the Philippines, and it’s easily identifiable as such.
When someone makes a big claim, the burden of proof is on them to prove it. This film doesn’t prove anything other than two guys cut the rope attached to an anchor and recovered it.