China's SCS Strategy Thread

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
I think Philippines won again here, China pretended nothing happened. Philippines definitely cut something, which mostly likely belonged to China or its fisherman.
Nope. CCG says the Phillipines faked it in a "self directed show".

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

“中国海警”公众号27日消息,中国海警局新闻发言人甘羽表示,9月22日,菲律宾渔业和水产资源局公务船未经中国政府批准,非法进入中国黄岩岛附近海域滋事挑衅。中国海警依法采取喊话警告、航路管制等必要措施对其有效管控,针对菲船冲闯潟湖临时布放拦阻网具,事后于9月23日主动收回拦阻设施、恢复常态管控,现场操作专业规范、合法合理。菲方所谓拆除中方拦阻网具,完全是捏造事实、自导自演。
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
Nope. CCG says the Phillipines faked it in a "self directed show".

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I read China FM's statement and CCG's statement, but it's not very convincing. As a neutral observer when you see a video of the phillippines coast guard cutting the end of a floating barrier which looks exactly like the one that China deployed, the Filipino story seems more convincing.


The only way I don't see China losing in this incident is if China can show, or if observers can reasonably infer that the phillippines setup up their own barrier in an uncontested water and cut their own rope. Anything less would be a Lose in my book.
 
Last edited:

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
I read China FM's statement and CCG's statement, but it's not very convincing. As a neutral observer when you see a video of the phillippines coast guard cutting the end of a floating barrier which looks exactly like the one that China deployed, the Filipino story seems more convincing.


The only way I don't see China losing in this incident is if China can show, or if observers can reasonably infer that the phillippines setup up their own barrier in an uncontested water and cut their own rope. Anything less would be a Lose in my book.
You set a very high bar for China. If the Phillippines made the show in a private place, how could CCG have caught it for evidence? In this case, we have to choose one side to believe.

What I can agree with you is that once again China did not win on propaganda. It's kind of expected given China's passive and reactive approach in SCS recently. It does not really matter though. The PH government might be able to fanfare frenzy up a notch or two at home with this clown show, but what seriously can it achieve for them? China does not really care.
 

coolgod

Colonel
Registered Member
You set a very high bar for China. If the Phillippines made the show in a private place, how could CCG have caught it for evidence? In this case, we have to choose one side to believe.

What I can agree with you is that once again China did not win on propaganda. It's kind of expected given China's passive and reactive approach in SCS recently. It does not really matter though. The PH government might be able to fanfare frenzy up a notch or two at home with this clown show, but what seriously can it achieve for them? China does not really care.
Yes the bar I set was pretty high, but that's because Philippines already propagandized the barrier earlier. But honestly China should (probably) have some sort of aerial or satellite footage of Philippines directing the show if it was really the case.

I still don't buy China's story, and even if I did I'm sure China won't release any proof of Philippines directing the show that to the dismay of many and would rather let the PH government use this as an off ramp.
 

SanWenYu

Captain
Registered Member
Another development worthy of caution - The US is in talks with Vietnam about offering F-16s to the VPAF.

The STC is definitely going to have a tougher time going forward, similarly to the ETC and NTC to the north...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I doubt it will materialize. Both the US and Vietnam are likely not sincere on this. The trust isn't just there between them.

Even if the deal does go through, it will take years to deliver. And Vietnamese will have a lot to change for their new toys. I'd wager that these F16s won't be operational by VPAF until 2030 at the earliest. Guess how many J20s and J35s PLA will be flying around Vietnam by then?

And how does F16, even the V model, compare to the Su30s that VPAF is operating, and the better Russian-made fighters such as Su35s that Vietnam can acquire more likely?

I wouldn't be worried by these F16s. Neither would STC.
 

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Another development worthy of caution - The US is in talks with Vietnam about offering F-16s to the VPAF.

The STC is definitely going to have a tougher time going forward, similarly to the ETC and NTC to the north...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Taiwan has F-16s and full western gear since the 1940's, yet they still don't even have enough parts to maintain their F-16s.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

How much harder is it for Vietnam to maintain only F-16s and no other western gear?

As an example, Vietnam will need to stock both SAE and ISO fasteners instead of ISO alone since all US planes are built and designed in inches/feet while every other country uses metric. They're not compatible.
 

plawolf

Lieutenant General
I read China FM's statement and CCG's statement, but it's not very convincing. As a neutral observer when you see a video of the phillippines coast guard cutting the end of a floating barrier which looks exactly like the one that China deployed, the Filipino story seems more convincing.


The only way I don't see China losing in this incident is if China can show, or if observers can reasonably infer that the phillippines setup up their own barrier in an uncontested water and cut their own rope. Anything less would be a Lose in my book.

Please use your knowledge and common sense.

Firstly, in the Philippino comedy sketch, they had two guys in a tiny rowboat with a motor. Just how much range do you think such a tiny craft can have? From where would they have been able to set off to even reach the floating barrier with that range?

Secondly, the tiny anchor and rope they cut would not have kept anything remotely as large as the floating barrier in place.

It looks like a couple of guys went a few hundred metres out from shore, dropped an anchor and length of rope that they brought with them, and then filmed themselves cutting the rope. There were zero recognisable features in the footage to show where it was shot, no shots or helpless Chinese coast guards looking on clutching pearls, and not even a DJI aero shot of the defeated barrier drifting off into the sunset. If this was real, you think the Philippines would not have made sure they got all that on camera to brag about?

This is just a fictional low budget, low effort fake that could have been shot at almost any beach in the Philippines, and it’s easily identifiable as such.

When someone makes a big claim, the burden of proof is on them to prove it. This film doesn’t prove anything other than two guys cut the rope attached to an anchor and recovered it.
 
Top