faulty logic: the Germans & Japanese were using mil. power to commit war their crimes & crimes against humanity, but ended up in tribunals, with many executed.
My faulty logic? I said that nothing is illegal if you have the military power and you just showed me 2 countries that were militarily defeated. That proves me right or wrong? This is a really low IQ mistake on your part. You're embarassing the horses; they'll disown you LOL
I have bad news for u: the Japanese r deadly serious; so r the British, not to mention Australia. If the US r committed, so will they.
I don't care for your imaginary news. These countries are not serious and will commit if they feel they can win and win without sacrifice. The Brits and Aussies are too far to really care and the Japanese bow to whomever is the most powerful. If the US thinks it can rely on others to hold its own hegemony, it will fall thinking it is stepping on a rock but actually stepping on mud.
u want to feel proud standing up to the West after a century of humiliation. If Chinese were really that smart, they would keep their giant junks, sail around the world, colonize Australia, Africa &/ Americas & not fight each other as much as they did-
Sail around the world colonizing countries.... are you living in the modern world or saying that China should have done this hundreds of years ago? This is drivel with no application to the modern world just like what you normally write.
perhaps then they wouldn't be beaten Europeans, Manchus & Japanese.
Hindsight's 20/20, eh? But worthless as with all of your opinions.
then China needs to stop saying that it doesn't want to dominate any1 & only wants to foster cooperation & trade among all nations. Others see it as a smoke screen to hide desire to impose her own rule & new world order. The Mongols, Brits, Germans, Japanese, the USSR & USA tried but failed, so will China.
I said become the strongest nation; I didn't say rule the whole world. Your reading comprehension problems are a drag on this discussion.
repeating the same thing won't make it any more valid.
If I repeat something, it's because you brought up the same old defeated point again, so I will repeat the point that defeated it.
they may pretend to submit but still plot to rebel.
First of all, that's fine. Initially, it's expected to be rocky with some terrorism but nowhere near the chaos in the US. Rebel? We will be too strong for it, by far.
Recall ur own anti-Mongol/Manchu/Japanese struggles.
This is what happens when a small country at the prime of its power temporarily captures a large country in a rut. The successes of small countries are temporary, as are the failures of large countries.
1st u'll destroy it's cities, ports & airports, then u'll need to rebuild them.
Why cities? Just military bases. Airports and ship ports captured. Anything that is broken down can easily be rebuilt; it is China's specialty.
those u bring/allow to come from the mainland to replace lost population may later demand their own independence, & the cycle will repeat.
You dream. By that logic, every island, Hawaii, Guam, Hainan, etc... all have rebellion risk. No, as long as the government rules over it, it will stabilize and be completely absorbed.
if things can go wrong, they will- don't count on good outcome.
The only thing that will go wrong is for the US if they try to intervene. I count on a good outcome always for China because in my lifetime, the CCP has always delivered it against the hapless hopes of western powers.
the UN may be reformed to reflect new reality.
LOLOL Dream on. When you lose, just say it might change LOL. This is a horse's debate skill???
that was before; now they r gearing up for a showdown, as they did in WW2.
No, that's now. There is currently no example of a Western nation daring to fight a powerful or nuclear opponent. "There's a first for everything," is literally the best you can come up with.
people of my sign have this ability,
Then why don't you have it? You just say wrong things and get beaten everywhere here. Are you sure you're a horse? Is it the ADHD?
knowledge isn't a practical skill.
No, but you still need it to debate and you don't have it... nor do you have the skill. I'm not the only one with this opinion, but you're the only one clinging to zodiac readings.
There is no logic in superstition; if it stinks, it's because that's what your zodiac reading is worth.
that's in ur subjective judgement.
And everyone elses' too.
if so, don't bring it up what I mind or not.
You have an English problem. I said, "Mind where you live," which means if you won't want the PRC to impose anything on you then be careful where you live. Its does not mean I care what you mind or don't mind.
I don't need ur instructions what to do.
Neither do I need yours telling me to be humble and wait for praise. The difference is, you were hoping to stay away from the PRC's influence, so if you don't heed my words and you choose wrong, for example Hong Kong, you will be in for a lot of suffering. Yours, not mine. I don't care how you end up.